The use of heuristics in genetic testing decision-making: A qualitative interview study

被引:0
|
作者
Zimmermann, Bettina Maria [1 ,2 ]
Shaw, David Martin [1 ,3 ]
Elger, Bernice [1 ,4 ]
Kone, Insa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Inst Biomed Eth, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Med, Inst Hist & Eth Med, Munich, Germany
[3] Maastricht Univ, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Geneva, Ctr Legal Med, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 11期
关键词
HEREDITARY BREAST; OVARIAN-CANCER; RISK PERCEPTION; HEALTH-CARE; FAMILY-HISTORY; WOMEN; JUDGMENT; UNCERTAINTY; EXPERIENCES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0260597
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Decision-making concerning predictive genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes is inherently complex. This study aims to investigate what kind of complexities adults undergoing genetic counseling in Switzerland experience, how they deal with them, and what heuristics they use during the decision-making process. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews with eighteen Swiss adults seeking genetic counseling for hereditary cancer syndrome genetic testing and two counseling physicians were conducted and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results Counselees stated that once they were aware of their eligibility for genetic testing they perceived an inevitable necessity to make a decision in a context of uncertainties. Some counselees perceived this decision as simple, others as very complex. High emotional involvement increased perceived complexity. We observed six heuristics that counselees used to facilitate their decision: Anticipating the test result; Focusing on consequences; Dealing with information; Interpreting disease risk; Using external guidance; and (Re-)Considering the general uncertainty of life. Limitations Our findings are limited to the context of predictive genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes. This qualitative study does not allow extrapolation of the relative frequency of which heuristics occur. Conclusions The use of heuristics is an inherent part of decision-making, particularly in the complex context of genetic testing for inherited cancer predisposition. However, some heuristics increase the risk of misinterpretation or exaggerated external influences. This may negatively impact informed decision-making. Thus, this study illustrates the importance of genetic counselors and medical professionals being aware of these heuristics and the individual manner in which they might be applied in the context of genetic testing decision-making. Findings may offer practical support to achieve this, as they inductively focus on the counselees' perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recognizing Heuristics and Bias in Clinical Decision-making
    Hughes, Tasha M.
    Dossett, Lesly A.
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Telem, Dana A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (05) : 813 - 814
  • [32] Heuristics and Political Elites' Judgment and Decision-Making
    Vis, Barbara
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2019, 17 (01) : 41 - 52
  • [33] GENETIC DECISION-MAKING
    LUBS, ML
    THOMSON, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1982, 34 (06) : A10 - A10
  • [34] PROBLEM STRUCTURING HEURISTICS IN STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING
    ABUALSAMH, RA
    CARLIN, B
    MCDANIEL, RR
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1990, 45 (02) : 159 - 174
  • [35] Heuristics, servants to intuition, in clinical decision-making
    Cioffi, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1997, 26 (01) : 203 - 208
  • [36] Decision-making and experiences of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in inherited heart diseases: a qualitative study
    Laura Yeates
    Kristie McDonald
    Charlotte Burns
    Christopher Semsarian
    Stacy Carter
    Jodie Ingles
    [J]. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2022, 30 : 187 - 193
  • [37] Decision-making and experiences of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in inherited heart diseases: a qualitative study
    Yeates, Laura
    McDonald, Kristie
    Burns, Charlotte
    Semsarian, Christopher
    Carter, Stacy
    Ingles, Jodie
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 30 (02) : 187 - 193
  • [38] The structure of qualitative decision-making
    Brugha, CM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 104 (01) : 46 - 62
  • [39] THE APPENDICITIS INTERVIEW PROJECT: A QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT DECISION-MAKING IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS
    Castelli, A.
    Drake, F. T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 61 (01) : 218 - 219
  • [40] Clinical decision making in the recognition of dying: a qualitative interview study
    Paul Taylor
    Dawn Dowding
    Miriam Johnson
    [J]. BMC Palliative Care, 16