The use of heuristics in genetic testing decision-making: A qualitative interview study

被引:0
|
作者
Zimmermann, Bettina Maria [1 ,2 ]
Shaw, David Martin [1 ,3 ]
Elger, Bernice [1 ,4 ]
Kone, Insa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Inst Biomed Eth, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Med, Inst Hist & Eth Med, Munich, Germany
[3] Maastricht Univ, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Geneva, Ctr Legal Med, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 11期
关键词
HEREDITARY BREAST; OVARIAN-CANCER; RISK PERCEPTION; HEALTH-CARE; FAMILY-HISTORY; WOMEN; JUDGMENT; UNCERTAINTY; EXPERIENCES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0260597
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Decision-making concerning predictive genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes is inherently complex. This study aims to investigate what kind of complexities adults undergoing genetic counseling in Switzerland experience, how they deal with them, and what heuristics they use during the decision-making process. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews with eighteen Swiss adults seeking genetic counseling for hereditary cancer syndrome genetic testing and two counseling physicians were conducted and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results Counselees stated that once they were aware of their eligibility for genetic testing they perceived an inevitable necessity to make a decision in a context of uncertainties. Some counselees perceived this decision as simple, others as very complex. High emotional involvement increased perceived complexity. We observed six heuristics that counselees used to facilitate their decision: Anticipating the test result; Focusing on consequences; Dealing with information; Interpreting disease risk; Using external guidance; and (Re-)Considering the general uncertainty of life. Limitations Our findings are limited to the context of predictive genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes. This qualitative study does not allow extrapolation of the relative frequency of which heuristics occur. Conclusions The use of heuristics is an inherent part of decision-making, particularly in the complex context of genetic testing for inherited cancer predisposition. However, some heuristics increase the risk of misinterpretation or exaggerated external influences. This may negatively impact informed decision-making. Thus, this study illustrates the importance of genetic counselors and medical professionals being aware of these heuristics and the individual manner in which they might be applied in the context of genetic testing decision-making. Findings may offer practical support to achieve this, as they inductively focus on the counselees' perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Autonomy and social influence in predictive genetic testing decision-making: A qualitative interview study
    Zimmermann, Bettina M.
    Kone, Insa
    Shaw, David
    Elger, Bernice
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2021, 35 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [2] PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING FOR ANEUPLOIDY: AN IN-DEPTH, QUALITATIVE STUDY OF THE DECISION-MAKING EXPERIENCE
    Kocas, H. Deniz
    Klein, Samantha L.
    Garzon, Margaux Genoff
    Rubin, Lisa R.
    Lobel, Marci
    Stelling, James
    Pastore, Lisa M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2020, 54 : S396 - S396
  • [3] Genetic testing decision-making experiences within families of colorectal cancer patients: A qualitative study
    He, Meng
    Guan, Jingjing
    Li, Huanhuan
    Dong, Yueyang
    Zhu, Xiangning
    Sun, Juanjuan
    Gao, Shizheng
    Zhi, Shengze
    Ni, Bu He Li Qian Mu Ai
    Sun, Jiao
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 66
  • [4] DECISION-MAKING ACROSS THE CKD TRAJECTORY: A QUALITATIVE INTERVIEW STUDY WITH CALD PATIENTS
    Muscat, D.
    Kanagaratnam, R.
    Shepherd, H.
    Sud, K.
    Mccaffery, K.
    Webster, A.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 22 : 48 - 48
  • [5] Coping and end-of-life decision-making in ALS: A qualitative interview study
    Spoden, Celia
    Wenzel, Olga
    Erdmann, Anke
    Neitzke, Gerald
    Hirschberg, Irene
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [6] Shared decision-making in psoriasis treatment: a qualitative interview study on the prescription of apremilast
    Hewitt, R.
    Bundy, C.
    Newi, A. -L.
    Chachos, E.
    Sommer, R.
    Kleyn, C. E.
    Augustin, M.
    Griffiths, C. E. M.
    Blome, C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 186 (01) : E55 - E56
  • [7] Exploration of decision-making regarding the transfer of mosaic embryos following preimplantation genetic testing: a qualitative study
    Cheng, Lin
    Meiser, Bettina
    Kennedy, Debra
    Kirk, Edwin
    Barlow-Stewart, Kristine
    Kaur, Rajneesh
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2022, 2022 (04)
  • [8] The Use of Heuristics in Adaptive Narratives to Inform Decision-Making Practices
    Elizabeth Csikar
    Jill Stefaniak
    [J]. TechTrends, 2021, 65 : 90 - 100
  • [9] What information sources do Dutch medical specialists use in medical decision-making: a qualitative interview study
    Weller, Floris S.
    Hamming, Jaap F.
    Repping, Sjoerd
    van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [10] The Use of Heuristics in Adaptive Narratives to Inform Decision-Making Practices
    Csikar, Elizabeth
    Stefaniak, Jill
    [J]. TECHTRENDS, 2021, 65 (01) : 90 - 100