Recognition memory for complex visual discriminations is influenced by stimulus interference in rodents with perirhinal cortex damage

被引:49
|
作者
Gilbert, PE
Kesner, RP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Head & Neck Surg, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Psychol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1101/lm.64503
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rats with perirhinal cortex (PRC), hippocampal, or sham lesions were trained on a successive discrimination go/no-go task to examine recognition memory for an array of visual objects with varying interference among the objects in the array. Rats were trained to recognize a target array consisting of four particular objects that could be presented in any one Of four possible configurations to cover baited food wells. If the four target objects were presented, the rat should displace each object to receive food. However, if a novel object replaced any one or more of the target objects, then the rat should withhold its response. The number of novel objects presented on nonrewarded trials varied from one to four. The fewer the number of novel objects in the array, the more interference the array shared with the target array, therefore increasing task difficulty. An increased number of novel objects should result in less interference with the target array and decreased task difficulty. Although accuracy was slightly lower in rats with hippocampal lesions compared with controls, the learning of the groups was not statistically different. In contrast, rats with PRC lesions were significantly impaired in learning compared with both control and hippocampal-lesioned rats. The results Suggest that recognition memory for complex visual discriminations is affected by stimulus interference in rodents with PRC damage.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 530
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interaction of frontal and perirhinal cortices in visual object recognition memory in monkeys
    Parker, A
    Gaffan, D
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (10) : 3044 - 3057
  • [42] The development of object recognition memory in rhesus macaques with neonatal lesions of the perirhinal cortex
    Zeamer, Alyson
    Richardson, Rebecca L.
    Weiss, Alison R.
    Bachevalier, Jocelyne
    DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 11 : 31 - 41
  • [43] MicroRNA-132 regulates recognition memory and synaptic plasticity in the perirhinal cortex
    Scott, Helen L.
    Tamagnini, Francesco
    Narduzzo, Katherine E.
    Howarth, Joanna L.
    Lee, Youn-Bok
    Wong, Liang-Fong
    Brown, Malcolm W.
    Warburton, Elizabeth C.
    Bashir, Zafar I.
    Uney, James B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 36 (07) : 2941 - 2948
  • [44] STIMULUS AND RESPONSE INTERFERENCE IN RECOGNITION-MEMORY EXPERIMENTS
    NORMAN, DA
    WAUGH, NC
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 78 (4P1): : 551 - &
  • [45] Perirhinal cortex muscarinic receptor blockade impairs taste recognition memory formation
    Gutiérrez, R
    De la Cruz, V
    Rodriguez-Ortiz, CJ
    Bermudez-Rattoni, F
    LEARNING & MEMORY, 2004, 11 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [46] Perception and recognition memory in monkeys following lesions of area TE and perirhinal cortex
    Buffalo, EA
    Ramus, SJ
    Squire, LR
    Zola, SM
    LEARNING & MEMORY, 2000, 7 (06) : 375 - 382
  • [47] Altered perirhinal cortex activity patterns during recognition memory in aged rats
    Gomez-Chacon, B.
    Morillas, E.
    Gallo, M.
    CHEMICAL SENSES, 2015, 40 (03) : 244 - 244
  • [48] Encoding of stimulus identity, memory, and reward expectation in monkey perirhinal cortex during delayed conditioning
    Uchiyama, Kaoru
    Matsumoto, Narihisa
    Shidara, Munetaka
    Sugase-Miyamoto, Yasuko
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2009, 65 : S237 - S237
  • [49] Interference on memory between olfactory stimulus and visual stimulus with time-interval
    Hashimoto, F.
    PERCEPTION, 2013, 42 : 166 - 167
  • [50] Monkey perirhinal cortex is critical for visual memory, but not for visual perception: Reexamination of the behavioural evidence from monkeys
    Hampton, RR
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION B-COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 58 (3-4): : 283 - 299