Critical evaluation of current treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer

被引:120
|
作者
Venook, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Canc, Clin Res Off, Div Med Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
来源
ONCOLOGIST | 2005年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
fluorouracil; irinotecan; oxaliplatin; bevacizumab; cetuximab; vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGF;
D O I
10.1634/theoncologist.10-4-250
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Fluorouracil (FU) has been the mainstay of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for many years. However, in recent years, newer chemotherapeutic agents, particularly irinotecan (Campostar (R); Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY, http://www.prizer.com) and more recently oxaliplatin (Eloxatin (R); Sanofi-Aventis Inc., New York, NY, http://www.sanori-aventis.com), have been shown to improve survival in combination with FU-based therapies. These agents were therefore incorporated into first- and second-line treatment strategies. The development of targeted agents that are tumor specific with better toxicity profiles than chemotherapeutic agents has widened the spectrum of therapies for this disease. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved two targeted agents for treating mCRC: an antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody (mAb), beva-cizumab (Avastin (R); Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, http://www.gene.com), in combination with first-line 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens and the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-1/ EGFR)-targeted mAb cetuximab (Erbitux (R); ImClone Systems, Inc., New York, NY, http://www.imclone.com) as monotherapy or in combination with irinotecan as second-line therapy in refractory cancer. These newer, more effective agents are improving clinical outcome for patients with mCRC. However, as the number of agents has increased, choosing the most effective treatment strategy has become increasingly complex. This review discusses the role of the individual agents in the treatment of mCRC and identifies the most effective regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 261
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current evidence and controversies in the incorporation of biologics for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Ciombor, Kristen K.
    Goldberg, Richard M.
    HEPATIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 1 (03) : 331 - 345
  • [42] An Update on the Current and Emerging Targeted Agents in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Chu, Edward
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2012, 11 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [43] Current treatment strategies in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias
    Chua, Yu Jo
    Cunningham, David
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2007, 6 (07) : 508 - 515
  • [44] Current role of antibody therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    P Pfeiffer
    C Qvortrup
    J G Eriksen
    Oncogene, 2007, 26 : 3661 - 3678
  • [45] Current role of antibody therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Pfeiffer, P.
    Qvortrup, C.
    Eriksen, J. G.
    ONCOGENE, 2007, 26 (25) : 3661 - 3678
  • [46] Safety profiles of current antiangiogenic therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Fuloria, Jyotsna
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2012, 5 : 133 - 142
  • [47] Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Value of Current Therapies
    Goldstein, Daniel A.
    Zeichner, Simon B.
    Bartnik, Catherine M.
    Neustadter, Eli
    Flowers, Christopher R.
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [48] Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Current Challenges and Future Prospects
    Lam, Marissa
    Lum, Caroline
    Latham, Sarah
    Smith, Sam Tipping
    Prenen, Hans
    Segelov, Eva
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 5819 - 5830
  • [49] Economic evaluation of the treatments of non-metastatic prostate cancer
    Perlbarg, J.
    Rabetrano, H.
    Soulie, M.
    Salomon, L.
    Durand-Zaleski, I.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2015, 25 (15): : 1108 - 1115
  • [50] Ethics for end-of-life treatments: Metastatic colorectal cancer is one example
    Garattini, Livio
    van de Vooren, Katelijne
    Zaniboni, Alberto
    HEALTH POLICY, 2013, 109 (01) : 97 - 103