Impact of the NHS Health Check on inequalities in cardiovascular disease risk: a difference-in-differences matching analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Chang, Kiara C-M [1 ,2 ]
Vamos, Eszter P. [1 ,2 ]
Palladino, Raffaele [1 ,2 ]
Majeed, Azeem [2 ]
Lee, John Tayu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Millett, Christopher [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Publ Hlth Policy Evaluat Unit, London W6 8RP, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth, London, England
[3] Univ Melbourne, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Nossal Inst Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
health inequalities; health services; prevention; screening; cardiovascular disease; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1136/jech-2018-210961
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background We assessed impacts of a large, nationwide cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management programme on sociodemographic group inequalities in (1) early identification of hypertension, type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD); and (2) management of global CVD risk among high-risk individuals. Methods We obtained retrospective electronic medical records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink for a randomly selected sample of 138 788 patients aged 40-74 years without known CVD or diabetes, who were registered with 462 practices between 2009 and 2013. We estimated programme impact using a difference-in-differences matching analysis that compared changes in outcome over time between attendees and non-attendees. Results National Health Service Health Check attendance was 21.4% (29 672/138 788). A significantly greater number of hypertension and T2D incident cases were identified in men than women (eg, an additional 4.02%, 95% CI 3.65% to 4.39%, and 2.08%, 1.81% to 2.35% cases of hypertension in men and women, respectively). A significantly greater number of T2D incident cases were identified among attendees living in the most deprived areas, but no differences were found for hypertension and CKD across socioeconomic groups. No major differences in CVD risk management were observed between sociodemographic subgroups (eg, programme impact on 10-year CVD risk score was -1.13%, -1.48% to -0.78% in male and -1.53%, -2.36% to -0.71% in female attendees). Conclusion During 2009-2013, the programme had low attendance and small overall impacts on early identification of disease and risk management. The age, sex and socioeconomic subgroups appeared to have derived similar level of benefits, leaving existing inequalities unchanged. These findings highlight the importance of population-wide interventions to address inequalities in CVD outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 18
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Impact of Title VII Dental Workforce Programs on Dentists' Practice Location: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
    Chou, Chiu-Fang
    Holtzman, Jennifer S.
    Rogers, Shane
    Chen, Candice
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2020, 95 (03) : 442 - 449
  • [42] Layoffs and the mental health and safety of remaining workers: a difference-in-differences analysis of the US aluminium industry
    Elser, Holly
    Ben-Michael, Eli
    Rehkopf, David
    Modrek, Sepideh
    Eisen, Ellen A.
    Cullen, Mark R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2019, 73 (12) : 1094 - 1100
  • [43] The impact of internal displacement on child mortality in post-earthquake Haiti: a difference-in-differences analysis
    Bradley Chen
    Timothy J. Halliday
    Victoria Y. Fan
    [J]. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15
  • [44] Impact of the 2016 Election on the Quality of Life of Sexual and Gender Minority Adults: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
    Grzenda, Adrienne
    Xu, Haiyong
    Miranda, Jeanne
    Ettner, Susan L.
    [J]. LGBT HEALTH, 2021, 8 (06) : 386 - 394
  • [45] The impact of internal displacement on child mortality in post-earthquake Haiti: a difference-in-differences analysis
    Chen, Bradley
    Halliday, Timothy J.
    Fan, Victoria Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2016, 15
  • [46] Health Care Utilization and Spending in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
    Schwartz, Aaron L.
    Zlaoui, Khalil
    Foreman, Robin P.
    Brennan, Troyen A.
    Newhouse, Joseph P.
    [J]. JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2021, 2 (12): : E214001
  • [47] Formulary Changes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and the Association with COPD Exacerbations, Health Care Utilization and Costs: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
    Duan, K.
    Donovan, L. M.
    Wong, E. S.
    Spece, L. J.
    Feemster, L. C.
    Bryant, A.
    Plumley, R.
    Collins, M. P.
    Au, D. H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [48] Evaluating the effect of hierarchical medical system on health seeking behavior: A difference-in-differences analysis in China
    Zhou, Zhongliang
    Zhao, Yaxin
    Shen, Chi
    Lai, Sha
    Nawaz, Rashed
    Gao, Jianmin
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 268
  • [49] Effects of environmental policy on public risk perceptions of haze in Tianjin City: A difference-in-differences analysis
    Watanabe, Reeko
    Watanabe, Tsunemi
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 109 : 199 - 212
  • [50] Performance bonuses and the quality of primary health care delivered by family health teams in Brazil: A difference-in-differences analysis
    Fardousi, Nasser
    da Silva, Everton Nunes
    Kovacs, Roxanne
    Borghi, Josephine
    Barreto, Jorge O. M.
    Kristensen, Soren Rud
    Sampaio, Juliana
    Shimizu, Helena Eri
    Gomes, Luciano B.
    Russo, Leticia Xander
    Gurgel, Garibaldi D.
    Powell-Jackson, Timothy
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (07)