Nurse, midwife and patient perspectives and experiences of diabetes management in an acute inpatient setting: a mixed-methods study

被引:3
|
作者
Holton, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Rasmussen, Bodil [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Turner, Joy [5 ]
Steele, Cheryl [6 ]
Ariarajah, Deepa [6 ]
Hamblin, Shane [7 ]
Crowe, Shane [5 ]
Schutte, Sandy [5 ]
Wynter, Karen [1 ,2 ]
Hussain, Ilyana Mohamed [5 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Western Hlth Partnership, Ctr Qual & Patient Safety Res, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Blegdamsvej 3B, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Fac Hlth Sci, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
[5] Nursing & Midwifery Western Hlth, POB 294, St Albans, Vic 3021, Australia
[6] Western Hlth, Diabet Educ Serv, POB 294, St Albans, Vic 3021, Australia
[7] Western Hlth, Endocrinol & Diabet, POB 294, St Albans, Vic 3021, Australia
关键词
Diabetes Mellitus; Australia; Nurses; Midwifery; Patients; Health Services; Hospitals; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-022-01022-w
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background In an acute hospital setting, diabetes can require intensive management with medication modification, monitoring and education. Yet little is known about the experiences and perspectives of nursing/midwifery staff and patients. The aim of this study was to investigate diabetes management and care for patients with diabetes in an acute care setting from the perspectives of nursing/midwifery staff and patients. Methods A convergent mixed-methods study design. Patients with diabetes (Type 1, Type 2 or gestational diabetes) recruited from a public health service in Melbourne, Australia completed a survey and nurses and midwives employed at the health service participated in focus groups. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the survey data. Thematic analysis was used for the free-text survey comments and focus group data. Results Surveys were completed by 151 patients. Although more than half of the patients were satisfied with the diabetes care they had received (n = 96, 67.6%), about a third felt the hospital nursing/midwifery staff had ignored their own knowledge of their diabetes care and management (n = 43, 30.8%). Few reported having discussed their diabetes management with the nursing/midwifery staff whilst in hospital (n = 47, 32.6%) or thought the nurses and midwives had a good understanding of different types of insulin (n = 43, 30.1%) and their administration (n = 47, 33.3%). Patients also reported food related barriers to their diabetes management including difficulties accessing appropriate snacks and drinks (n = 46, 30.5%), restricted food choices and timing of meals (n = 41, 27.2%). Fourteen nurses and midwives participated in two focus groups. Two main themes were identified across both groups: 1. challenges caring for patients with diabetes; and 2. lack of confidence and knowledge about diabetes management. Conclusions Patients and nursing/midwifery staff reported challenges managing patients' diabetes in the hospital setting, ensuring patients' optimal self-management, and provision of suitable food and timing of meals. It is essential to involve patients in their diabetes care and provide regular and up-to-date training and resources for nursing/midwifery staff to ensure safe and high-quality inpatient diabetes care and improve patient and staff satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Midwives' readiness for midwife-led care: a mixed-methods study
    Kuipers, Yvonne J.
    Bosmans, Valerie
    Thaels, Ellen
    De Bock, Vanessa
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2024, 37 (06)
  • [22] A Mixed-Methods Study of Gender Differences in Nurse Reporting and Nurse Discipline
    Smiley, Richard A.
    McCarthy, Carey
    Journal of Nursing Regulation, 2016, 7 (03) : 33 - 40
  • [23] Implementation of a nurse practitioner role in inpatient surgery: A mixed-methods study in a pre-post design
    von Dach, Christoph
    Lendner, Ilka
    Cecini, Ramona
    PFLEGE, 2023, 36 (03): : 179 - 185
  • [24] Supporting Women at the Time of Abortion: A Mixed-Methods Study of Male Partner Experiences and Perspectives
    Nguyen, Brian T.
    Hebert, Luciana E.
    Newton, Sara L.
    Gilliam, Melissa L.
    PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2018, 50 (02) : 75 - 83
  • [25] Exploration of Users' Perspectives and Needs and Design of a Type 1 Diabetes Management Mobile App: Mixed-Methods Study
    Zhang, Yiyu
    Li, Xia
    Luo, Shuoming
    Liu, Chaoyuan
    Liu, Fang
    Zhou, Zhiguang
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2018, 6 (09):
  • [26] Public health nurse referrals for paediatric weight management: A nested mixed-methods study
    Nam Hoang Nguyen
    Kebbe, Maryam
    Peng, Chenhui
    Van Hulst, Andraea
    Ball, Geoff Denis Charles
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (17-18) : 3263 - 3271
  • [27] Understanding patients' and dentists' perspectives in dental trauma management: A mixed-methods study
    Ode, Wataru
    Lopez, Violeta
    Wong, Mun Loke
    Schou, Lone
    Yu, Victoria Soo Hoon
    DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, 2018, 34 (05) : 320 - 328
  • [28] Patient perspectives on surgical handover quality: a mixed-methods survey
    Jessica M. Ryan
    Philip Tomlinson
    Anastasija Simiceva
    Dara O. Kavanagh
    Walter Eppich
    Ailbhe O’Driscoll Collins
    Bevin Arthurs
    Catherine Timon
    Luke McGarry
    Clothilde Dunleavy
    Sandra Stewart
    Annabella Stewart-Miller
    Adam Fairhurst
    Simon Roe
    William Murray
    Deborah A. McNamara
    Patient Safety in Surgery, 19 (1)
  • [29] Nurses' Perspectives and Experiences of Using a Bed-Exit Information System in an Acute Hospital Setting: Mixed Methods Study
    Walzer, Stefan
    Schoen, Isabel
    Pfeil, Johanna
    Klemm, Sam
    Ziegler, Sven
    Schmoor, Claudia
    Kunze, Christophe
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2025, 9
  • [30] Clinician Perspectives on Barriers and Enablers to Implementing an Inpatient Oncology Early Warning System: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Lyons, Patrick G.
    Chen, Vanessa
    Sekhar, Tejas C.
    McEvoy, Colleen A.
    Kollef, Marin H.
    Govindan, Ramaswamy
    Westervelt, Peter
    Vranas, Kelly C.
    Maddox, Thomas M.
    Geng, Elvin H.
    Payne, Philip R. O.
    Politi, Mary C.
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2023, 7 : e2200104