Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors with Multiagent Chemotherapy for High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Decreases Neutropenic Complications and Treatment Delays

被引:0
|
作者
Kanis, Margaux J. [1 ]
Greendyk, Richard A. [1 ]
Sobecki-Rausch, Janelle [1 ]
Dayno, Megan E. [1 ]
Lurain, John R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, John I Brewer Trophoblast Dis Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
chemotherapy; gestational trophoblastic disease; gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; neutropenia; neutropenic fever; G-CSF; granulocyte colony-stimulating factors; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) in preventing neutropenic complications and treatment delays in patients receiving multiagent chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-five patients received multiagent chemotherapy for high-risk GTN from 2001-2016. G-CSFs were administered as secondary therapy in the EMA-CO protocol and as primary therapy in the EMA-EP, BEP, VIP, ICE, and TP/TE regimens. Patient and disease characteristics, number of chemotherapy cycles and regimens, morbidity, treatment delays, and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-one (84%) of 25 high-risk GTN patients received G-CSFs: 4 as secondary therapy in the 23 patients who received EMA-CO and 17 as primary prophylaxis in those receiving platinum-containing regimens. Only 20 (7.6%) of 264 total chemotherapy cycles were delayed due to neutropenia. Dose reductions were necessary in only 2.3% of chemotherapy cycles. Neutropenic fever was associated with 3% of chemotherapy cycles. Eight patients (32%) had minor side effects attributable to G-CSFs. Overall survival was 88%. CONCLUSION: In treating high-risk GTN with multiagent chemotherapy regimens, G-CSFs administered secondarily after a neutropenic complication or as primary prophylaxis in patients at high risk for febrile neutropenia decreases morbidity, treatment delays, and dose reductions, resulting in improved outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 212
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as infection prophylaxis in high-risk oncologic surgery
    Meropol, NJ
    Petrelli, NJ
    Lipman, BJ
    RodriguezBigas, M
    Hicks, W
    Douglass, HO
    Smith, JL
    Rasey, M
    Blumenson, LE
    Vaickus, L
    Hayes, FA
    Agosti, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 172 (03): : 299 - 302
  • [22] Economic Evaluation of Intensive Chemotherapy With Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer in Japan
    Ishiguro, Hiroshi
    Kondo, Masahide
    Hoshi, Shu-Ling
    Takada, Masahiro
    Nakamura, Seigo
    Teramukai, Satoshi
    Yanagihara, Kazuhiro
    Toi, Masakazu
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (02) : 311 - 326
  • [23] Economic analysis of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use based on a risk model for neutropenic complications in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.
    Dale, D. C.
    Cosler, L. E.
    Wolff, D. A.
    Culakova, E.
    Poniewierski, M. S.
    Crawford, J.
    Lyman, G. H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 327S - 327S
  • [24] Appropriateness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients receiving chemotherapy by febrile neutropenia risk level
    Baig, Hassam
    Somlo, Barbara
    Eisen, Melissa
    Stryker, Scott
    Bensink, Mark
    Morrow, Phuong K.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (07) : 1576 - 1585
  • [25] EMA-CO chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a clinical analysis of 54 patients
    Lu, W. -G.
    Ye, F.
    Shen, Y. -M.
    Fu, Y. -F.
    Chen, H. -Z.
    Wan, X. -Y.
    Xie, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 (02) : 357 - 362
  • [26] Management of High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia with Etoposide, Methotrexate, Actinomycin D, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine Chemotherapy
    Cyriac, Sanju
    Rajendranath, Rejiv
    Sridevi, Veluswami
    Sagar, Tenali G.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 56 (5-6) : 219 - 223
  • [27] Treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with weekly high-dose methotrexate-etoposide
    Han, Sileny N.
    Amant, Frederic
    Leunen, Karin
    Devi, Uma K.
    Neven, Patrick
    Berteloot, Patrick
    Vergote, Ignace
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 127 (01) : 47 - 50
  • [28] Diagnosis and Treatment of High-Risk Metastatic Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia in Hungary 40 Years of Experience
    Fulop, Vilmos
    Szigetvari, Ivan
    Szepesi, Janos
    Vegh, Gyorgy
    Demeter, Janos
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 63 (5-6) : 240 - 248
  • [29] The use of EMA-CO in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: The New England Trophoblastic Disease Center experience
    Ghosh, S.
    Baron, E.
    Nevadunsky, N.
    Goldstein, D.
    Horowitz, N.
    Berkowitz, R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 116 (03) : S91 - S92
  • [30] TREATMENT OF HIGH-RISK GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE WITH CHEMOTHERAPY COMBINATIONS CONTAINING CISPLATIN AND ETOPOSIDE
    THEODORE, C
    AZAB, M
    DROZ, JP
    ASSOULINE, A
    GEORGE, M
    PIOT, G
    BELLET, D
    MICHEL, G
    AMIEL, JL
    CANCER, 1989, 64 (09) : 1824 - 1828