Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Effect of the Learning Curve

被引:42
|
作者
Kumar, Abhishek [1 ]
Merrill, Robert K. [1 ]
Overley, Samuel C. [1 ]
Leven, Dante M. [1 ]
Meaike, Joshua J. [1 ]
Vaishnav, Avani [2 ]
Gang, Catherine [2 ]
Qureshi, Sheeraz A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY | 2019年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
minimally invasive spine surgery; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; fluoroscopy; radiation exposure; learning curve; INJURIES; SURGEONS; OUTCOMES; RISKS;
D O I
10.14444/6006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) has comparable fusion rates and outcomes to the open approach, though many surgeons avoid the technique due to an initial learning curve. No current studies have examined the learning curve of MI-TLIF with respect to fluoroscopy time and exposure. Our objective with this retrospective review was to therefore use a repeatable mathematical model to evaluate the learning curve of MI-TLIF with a focus on fluoroscopy time and exposure. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of single level, primary fusions performed by a single surgeon during his initial experience with minimally invasive spine surgery. Chronologic case number was plotted against variables of interest, and learning was identified as the point at which the instantaneous rate of change of a curve fit to the data set equaled the average rate of change of the data set. Results: One hundred nine cases were reviewed. Proficiency in operative time was achieved at 38 cases with the first 38 requiring a median of 137 minutes compared to 104 minutes for the latter 71 cases (P<.0001). Mastery of fluoroscopy use occurred at case 51. The median fluoroscopy time for the first 51 cases was 2.8 minutes, which dropped to 2.1 minutes for cases 52 to 109 (P<.0001). The complication rate plateaued after 43 cases, with 3 of 11 total complications occurring in the latter 76 cases. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the most gradual learning occurred with respect to fluoroscopy time and exposure, and operative time improved the quickest. Level of Evidence: IV. Clinical Relevance: These findings may guide spine surgeon education and training in minimally invasive techniques, and help determine safe case loads for radiation exposure during the initial learning phase of the technique. The model used to identify the learning curve can also be applied to several fields and surgical techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 45
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes
    Karikari, Isaac O.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S294 - S301
  • [42] Radiation reduction of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with localisation system in overweight patients
    Fan, G.
    Fu, Q.
    Zhang, J.
    Zhang, H.
    Gu, X.
    Wang, C.
    Gu, G.
    Guan, X.
    Fan, Y.
    He, S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (07): : 944 - 950
  • [43] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kulkarni, Arvind G.
    Bohra, Hussain
    Dhruv, Abhilash
    Sarraf, Abhishek
    Bassi, Anupreet
    Patil, Vishwanath M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 50 (05) : 464 - 472
  • [44] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Arvind G. Kulkarni
    Hussain Bohra
    Abhilash Dhruv
    Abhishek Sarraf
    Anupreet Bassi
    Vishwanath M. Patil
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2016, 50 : 464 - 472
  • [45] Comparison of the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Diseases: A Matched Case-Control
    Shi, Liang
    Ding, Tao
    Shi, Yihua
    Wang, Fang
    Wu, Chengcong
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 167 : E1231 - E1240
  • [46] Effect of steerable cage placement during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on lumbar lordosis
    Lindley, Timothy E.
    Viljoen, Stephanus V.
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (03) : 441 - 444
  • [47] Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Surgery Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Liu, Chao
    Wang, Jian
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 120 : E88 - E93
  • [48] Comparative study of open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) based on clinical outcome, radiological outcome, tissue injury markers and radiation exposure
    Srikanth, T.
    Thota, Silpa
    Venkat, K.
    Chandra, V. VRamesh
    Prasad, B. C. M.
    JOURNAL OF KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY, 2023, 12 (01) : 107 - 114
  • [49] Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Kai
    Tu, Qihao
    Kong, Meng
    Zhao, Chong
    Ma, Xuexiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 549 - 558
  • [50] Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Vemula V. R.
    Prasad, Bodapati C. M.
    Hanu, Tammireddy G.
    Kale, Pavan G.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 127 - 134