A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse

被引:28
|
作者
Jirschele, K. [1 ]
Seitz, M. [1 ]
Zhou, Y. [2 ]
Rosenblatt, P. [3 ]
Culligan, P. [4 ]
Sand, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, NorthShore Univ HealthSyst, Div Urogynecol, Skokie, IL 60076 USA
[2] NorthShore Univ HealthSyst, Ctr Biomed & Res Informat, Evanston, IL USA
[3] Boston Urogynecol Associates, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Atlantic Hlth Syst Div Urogynecol, Morristown, NJ USA
关键词
Hysteropexy; Pelvic organ prolapse; Polypropylene mesh; Surgery; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; TRANSVAGINAL MESH; ANTERIOR; SURGERY; ATRIUM; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-014-2564-x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Hysterectomy is often part of pelvic organ prolapse repair. However, this may offer no benefit when compared to uterine preservation. We aimed to prospectively evaluate a minimally invasive bilateral sacrospinous hysteropexy using polypropylene mesh. We hypothesized that anatomic success and patient satisfaction can be achieved with this technique. Women with uterovaginal prolapse desiring surgery who had completed childbearing were enrolled. Preoperative assessment included standardized prolapse examination and validated symptom and pain scale questionnaires. Women with prior pelvic organ prolapse repair or any contraindication to uterine preservation were excluded. Data including demographic, operative and postoperative information was collected on patients for 1 year following surgery. Continuous variables are summarized as means (standard deviation) and categorical variables are summarized as frequencies and percentages. A mixed-effects model was used to evaluate the changes in questionnaire scores and outcomes at 6 months and 12 months after surgery with random effects accounting for the center effect with adjustment for age. The study group comprised 99 women from three female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (urogynecology) centers. The average age of the participants was 67.0 years (11.32 years), BMI 26.04 kg/m(2) (3.56 kg/m(2)), and the majority were multiparous (98.9 %) and menopausal (90.9 %). Overall success at 12 months, as measured by composite outcome was 97.7 % (with the Ba point as the anatomic landmark) and 96.6 % (with the C point as the anatomic landmark). The overall exposure rate was 6.52 % and reoperation rate was 7.53 %. All subjective questionnaire scores and anatomic outcomes had improved at 12 months. Sacrospinous hysteropexy using a minimally invasive polypropylene mesh kit is an effective and safe technique for addressing uterovaginal prolapse as an alternative to hysterectomy at the time of pelvic reconstructive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 748
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse
    K. Jirschele
    M. Seitz
    Y. Zhou
    P. Rosenblatt
    P. Culligan
    P. Sand
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2015, 26 : 743 - 748
  • [2] Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management
    Overholt, Tyler L.
    Velet, Liliya
    Xu, Mark
    Dutta, Rahul
    Matthews, Catherine A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 (10) : 2603 - 2609
  • [3] Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management
    Tyler L. Overholt
    Liliya Velet
    Mark Xu
    Rahul Dutta
    Catherine A. Matthews
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2023, 34 : 2603 - 2609
  • [4] Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management
    Yu-Ling Tu
    Yu-Hsuan Chen
    Cheng-Yu Long
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2024, 35 : 735 - 735
  • [5] Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management
    Tu, Yu-Ling
    Chen, Yu-Hsuan
    Long, Cheng-Yu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 35 (03) : 735 - 735
  • [6] Sacrospinous Hysteropexy: Native Tissue Compared to Mesh Augmented Repair for the Surgical Management of Uterovaginal Prolapse
    Overholt, T.
    Velet, L.
    Xu, M.
    Dutta, R.
    Matthews, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S170 - S171
  • [7] Sacrospinous Hysteropexy: Native Tissue Compared to Mesh Augmented Repair for the Surgical Management of Uterovaginal Prolapse
    Overholt, T.
    Velet, L.
    Dutta, R.
    Mugford, H.
    Matthews, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S469 - S469
  • [8] The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse
    Dietz, Viviane
    de Jong, Joyce
    Huisman, Marieke
    Koops, Steven Schraffordt
    Heintz, Peter
    van der Vaart, Huub
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 (11) : 1271 - 1276
  • [9] NATIVE TISSUE ANTERIOR SACROSPINOUS HYSTEROPEXY IS AN EFFECTIVE AND SAFE APPROACH FOR PRIMARY UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE COMPARED TO MESH AUGMENTED REPAIR
    Overholt, Tyler
    Velet, Liliya
    Xu, Mark
    Dutta, Rahul
    Matthews, Catherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E91 - E92
  • [10] The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse
    Viviane Dietz
    Joyce de Jong
    Marieke Huisman
    Steven Schraffordt Koops
    Peter Heintz
    Huub van der Vaart
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2007, 18 : 1271 - 1276