Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management

被引:3
|
作者
Overholt, Tyler L. [1 ]
Velet, Liliya [1 ]
Xu, Mark [1 ]
Dutta, Rahul [1 ]
Matthews, Catherine A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist, Dept Urol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist, Div Female Pelv Med, 1 Med Ctr Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
Uterovaginal prolapse; sacrospinous hysteropexy; transvaginal repair; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; CLASSIFICATION; SUSPENSION; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-023-05589-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesisAnterior sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) was popularized by transvaginal mesh kits. Following mesh-kit market withdrawal, we hypothesized similar efficacy through native-tissue reattachment of the pubocervical fascia with fixation of the anterior cervix to the sacrospinous ligament. Few analyses for anterior native-tissue versus mesh-augmented SSH exist.MethodsA retrospective analysis of women who underwent transvaginal anterior SSH between 01 January 2016 and 31 December 2022 was performed. Women who underwent a mesh-augmented (Uphold Lite Vaginal Support System & TRADE;) versus native-tissue repair were compared. Composite success was defined as no bulge symptoms, no retreatment, and no recurrence beyond the hymen with apex nondescended > one third of the total vaginal length. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were obtained as indicated.ResultsOf 223 women screened, inclusion criteria were met by 124 (40 mesh-augmented; 84 native-tissue). There was no difference in pre-operative characteristics between groups. Composite success was demonstrated in 95.2% of women with a median follow-up of 224 days (range: 30-988). Two women in the mesh-augmented group reported bulge symptoms and underwent re-treatment with a pessary. Four women in the native-tissue group reported bulge symptoms; 3 underwent re-treatment (2 pessary, 1 surgery). There were no differences in composite success rates between groups (p=0.954). There were additionally no differences in intra-operative (p=0.752) or post-operative (p=0.292) complication rates between the groups. There were no mesh-related complications, including exposure or chronic pelvic pain.ConclusionsNinety-five percent of women achieved surgical success and the use of mesh augmentation did not confer added benefit in terms of efficacy or complications when compared with native tissue. Further long-term data are needed to continue our assessment of native-tissue anterior SSH.
引用
收藏
页码:2603 / 2609
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management
    Tyler L. Overholt
    Liliya Velet
    Mark Xu
    Rahul Dutta
    Catherine A. Matthews
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2023, 34 : 2603 - 2609
  • [2] Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management
    Yu-Ling Tu
    Yu-Hsuan Chen
    Cheng-Yu Long
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2024, 35 : 735 - 735
  • [3] Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management
    Tu, Yu-Ling
    Chen, Yu-Hsuan
    Long, Cheng-Yu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 35 (03) : 735 - 735
  • [4] NATIVE TISSUE ANTERIOR SACROSPINOUS HYSTEROPEXY IS AN EFFECTIVE AND SAFE APPROACH FOR PRIMARY UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE COMPARED TO MESH AUGMENTED REPAIR
    Overholt, Tyler
    Velet, Liliya
    Xu, Mark
    Dutta, Rahul
    Matthews, Catherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E91 - E92
  • [5] Sacrospinous Hysteropexy: Native Tissue Compared to Mesh Augmented Repair for the Surgical Management of Uterovaginal Prolapse
    Overholt, T.
    Velet, L.
    Xu, M.
    Dutta, R.
    Matthews, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S170 - S171
  • [6] Sacrospinous Hysteropexy: Native Tissue Compared to Mesh Augmented Repair for the Surgical Management of Uterovaginal Prolapse
    Overholt, T.
    Velet, L.
    Dutta, R.
    Mugford, H.
    Matthews, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S469 - S469
  • [7] A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse
    K. Jirschele
    M. Seitz
    Y. Zhou
    P. Rosenblatt
    P. Culligan
    P. Sand
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2015, 26 : 743 - 748
  • [8] A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse
    Jirschele, K.
    Seitz, M.
    Zhou, Y.
    Rosenblatt, P.
    Culligan, P.
    Sand, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (05) : 743 - 748
  • [9] Transvaginal mesh removal with native-tissue repair for mesh shrinkage and recurrent uterovaginal prolapse following vaginal mesh-augmented surgery
    Milani, Rodolfo
    Frigerio, Matteo
    Palmieri, Stefania
    Manodoro, Stefano
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2017, 139 (01) : 105 - 106
  • [10] Anterior vaginal mesh sacrospinous hysteropexy and posterior fascial plication for anterior compartment dominated uterovaginal prolapse
    Benjamin Feiner
    Lieke Gietelink
    Christopher Maher
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2010, 21 : 203 - 208