Evidence reasoning rule-based classifier with uncertainty quantification

被引:66
|
作者
Xu, Xiaobin [1 ]
Zhang, Deqing [1 ]
Bai, Yu [2 ]
Chang, Leilei [1 ]
Li, Jianning [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Automat, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Tongde Hosp Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Date classification; Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DST); Evidential reasoning (ER) rule; Measure of uncertainty; Rough set; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; MACHINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2019.12.037
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DST)-based classifier design, the newly proposed evidence reasoning (ER) rule can be used as a multi-attribute classifier to combine multiple pieces of evidence generated from quantitative samples or qualitative knowledge of many attributes. Different from the classical Dempster's combination (DC) rule and its improved forms, ER rule definitely distinguishes the reliability and importance weight of evidence. The former reflects the ability of a single attribute or the corresponding evidence to give correct classification results whereas the latter clarifies the relative importance of evidence when it is combined with other pieces of evidence. Here how to determine the reliability factor is a key problem because it is the connection between the preceding evidence acquisition and the following evidence combination with the importance weights. Therefore, the main aim of this paper is to present a universal method for obtaining the reliability factor by quantifying the uncertainties of samples and the generated evidence. Experiential results on five popular benchmark databases taken from University of California Irvine (UCI) machine learning database show the improved classifier can give higher classification accuracy than the original ER-based classifier without considering uncertainty quantification and other classical or mainstream classifiers. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 204
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PARALLEL RULE-BASED ALGORITHMS FOR REASONING SYSTEMS
    HALL, LO
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, VOL 1, 1989, 1 : 179 - 186
  • [22] Fuzzy Rule-Based Interpolative Reasoning: A Survey
    Li, Fang-Yi
    Li, Ying
    Yang, Jing
    [J]. Jisuanji Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Computers, 2022, 45 (08): : 1687 - 1711
  • [23] A Rule-Based Modal View of Causal Reasoning
    Lorini, Emiliano
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SECOND INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2023, 2023, : 3286 - 3295
  • [24] Rule-Based Contextual Reasoning in Ambient Intelligence
    Bikakis, Antonis
    Antoniou, Grigoris
    [J]. SEMANTIC WEB RULES, 2010, 6403 : 74 - 88
  • [25] Using Rule-Based Reasoning for RDF Validation
    Arndt, Dorthe
    De Meester, Ben
    Dimou, Anastasia
    Verborgh, Ruben
    Mannens, Erik
    [J]. RULES AND REASONING, 2017, 10364 : 22 - 36
  • [26] A Rule-Based Implementation of Fuzzy Tableau Reasoning
    Bragaglia, Stefano
    Chesani, Federico
    Mello, Paola
    Sottara, Davide
    [J]. SEMANTIC WEB RULES, 2010, 6403 : 35 - 49
  • [27] INTEGRATING CASE-BASED AND RULE-BASED REASONING
    DUTTA, S
    BONISSONE, PP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 1993, 8 (03) : 163 - 203
  • [28] Probabilistic reasoning in fuzzy rule-based systems
    van den Berg, J
    Kaymak, U
    van den Bergh, WM
    [J]. SOFT METHODS IN PROBABILITY, STATISTICS AND DATA ANALYSIS, 2002, : 189 - 196
  • [29] Integrations of rule-based and case-based reasoning
    Prentzas, J
    Hatzilygeroudis, I
    [J]. CCCT 2003, VOL 4, PROCEEDINGS: COMPUTER, COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES: I, 2003, : 81 - 85
  • [30] RULE-BASED AND CASE-BASED REASONING: A COMPARISON
    Berka, Petr
    [J]. STRATEGIC MODELING IN MANAGEMENT, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY (IDIMT-2018), 2018, 47 : 217 - 224