Evidence reasoning rule-based classifier with uncertainty quantification

被引:66
|
作者
Xu, Xiaobin [1 ]
Zhang, Deqing [1 ]
Bai, Yu [2 ]
Chang, Leilei [1 ]
Li, Jianning [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Automat, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Tongde Hosp Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Date classification; Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DST); Evidential reasoning (ER) rule; Measure of uncertainty; Rough set; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; MACHINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2019.12.037
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DST)-based classifier design, the newly proposed evidence reasoning (ER) rule can be used as a multi-attribute classifier to combine multiple pieces of evidence generated from quantitative samples or qualitative knowledge of many attributes. Different from the classical Dempster's combination (DC) rule and its improved forms, ER rule definitely distinguishes the reliability and importance weight of evidence. The former reflects the ability of a single attribute or the corresponding evidence to give correct classification results whereas the latter clarifies the relative importance of evidence when it is combined with other pieces of evidence. Here how to determine the reliability factor is a key problem because it is the connection between the preceding evidence acquisition and the following evidence combination with the importance weights. Therefore, the main aim of this paper is to present a universal method for obtaining the reliability factor by quantifying the uncertainties of samples and the generated evidence. Experiential results on five popular benchmark databases taken from University of California Irvine (UCI) machine learning database show the improved classifier can give higher classification accuracy than the original ER-based classifier without considering uncertainty quantification and other classical or mainstream classifiers. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 204
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Asynchronous optimization approach for evidential reasoning rule-based classifier
    Zhao, Ruirui
    Sun, Jianbin
    Tu, Li
    Jiang, Jiang
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 127
  • [2] Design and Implementation of Rule-Based Uncertainty Reasoning in Smart House
    Xiao, Biyi
    Chen, Leiting
    Liu, Ming
    Cao, Yue
    Yang, Yong
    [J]. 2015 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICCT), 2015, : 441 - 448
  • [3] A COMBINED STATISTICAL AND RULE-BASED CLASSIFIER
    TIEN, D
    NICKOLLS, P
    [J]. IMAGES OF THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, PTS 1-6, 1989, 11 : 1829 - 1829
  • [4] Clustering Based on Fuzzy Rule-Based Classifier
    Behera, D. K.
    Patra, P. K.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN DATA MINING, VOL 1, 2015, 31 : 233 - 242
  • [5] Expressive Rule-Based Stream Reasoning
    Beck, Harald
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI), 2015, : 4341 - 4342
  • [6] Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning
    Frye, D
    Zelazo, PD
    Palfai, T
    [J]. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 10 (04) : 483 - 527
  • [7] Rule-Based Reasoning with Belief Structures
    Bialek, Lukasz
    Dunin-Keplicz, Barbara
    Szalas, Andrzej
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, ISMIS 2017, 2017, 10352 : 229 - 239
  • [8] A reasoning framework for rule-based WSML
    Grimm, Stephan
    Keller, Uwe
    Lausen, Holger
    Nagypal, Gabor
    [J]. SEMANTIC WEB: RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4519 : 114 - +
  • [9] A rule-based language for probabilistic reasoning
    Wong, SKM
    [J]. INFORMATION, UNCERTAINTY AND FUSION, 2000, 516 : 221 - 232
  • [10] Knowledge Authoring for Rule-Based Reasoning
    Gao, Tiantian
    Fodor, Paul
    Kifer, Michael
    [J]. ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS (OTM 2018), PT II, 2018, 11230 : 461 - 480