Validation of chromogenic in situ hybridization for detection of EGFR copy number amplification in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

被引:44
|
作者
Sholl, Lynette M.
Iafrate, A. John
Chou, Yi-Ping
Wu, Ming-Tsang
Goan, Yih-Gang
Su, Li
Huang, Yen-Tsung
Christiani, David C.
Chirieac, Lucian R.
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Chest Surg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Grad Inst Occupat Safety & Hlth, Dept Family Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med,Pulmonary & Crit Care Unit, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
EGFR; lung cancer; chromogenic in situ hybridization;
D O I
10.1038/modpathol.3800946
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number correlates with response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), a standard methodology to detect EGFR copy number abnormalities in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, is limited by instrumentation and cost. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is an emerging alternative detection technique using light microscopy, but its utility in assessing EGFR copy number in lung cancer is not established. To address the utility of CISH, we studied paraffin-embedded nonsmall cell lung carcinoma specimens from 77 Taiwanese nonsmoking women treated by surgery alone. We recorded the number of signals per tumor cell nucleus, correlated EGFR copy number by CISH with FISH results, and used receiver operating characteristics to identify cut-off points for the CISH results. Tumors were classified as adenocarcinoma (n = 28), mixed adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features (n = 25), bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (n = 2), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 15), and adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 7). By FISH, 29% of cases had no amplification, 18% had low polysomy, 35% had high polysomy, and 12% had gene amplification. EGFR copy number detected by CISH highly correlated with FISH (Spearman r = 0.81, P<0.0001). We determined the optimal EGFR CISH cut-off points that discriminate between no amplification and low polysomy (2.8 signals, P = 0.09); no amplification plus low polysomy and high polysomy plus gene amplification (4.5 signals, P<0.0001); and high polysomy and gene amplification (7.1 signals, P = 0.0003). CISH is an alternative assay to FISH in determining EGFR copy number status that may contribute to stratification of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma for clinical trials and identify a subset of patients that should be treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
引用
收藏
页码:1028 / 1035
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cigarette smoking increases copy number alterations in nonsmall-cell lung cancer
    Huang, Yen-Tsung
    Lin, Xihong
    Liu, Yan
    Chirieac, Lucian R.
    McGovern, Ray
    Wain, John
    Heist, Rebecca
    Skaug, Vidar
    Zienolddiny, Shanbeh
    Haugen, Aage
    Su, Li
    Fox, Edward A.
    Wong, Kwok-Kin
    Christiani, David C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (39) : 16345 - 16350
  • [42] EGF-r gene copy number changes in renal cell carcinoma detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Moch, H
    Sauter, G
    Gasser, TC
    Bubendorf, L
    Richter, J
    Presti, JC
    Waldman, FM
    Mihatsch, MJ
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1998, 184 (04): : 424 - 429
  • [43] Determination of HER2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) in archival breast carcinoma
    Zhao, JX
    Wu, RN
    Au, A
    Marquez, A
    Yu, YB
    Shi, ZR
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 15 (06) : 657 - 665
  • [44] Telomerase (h-TERT) and Targeting EGFR in Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Combined Immunohistochemistry and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization Study Based on Tissue Microarrays
    Stamatelopoulos, Athanassios
    Tsiambas, Evangelos
    Michos, Petros
    Antzoulatos, Nicolaos
    Gakidis, Ioannis
    Chatziantoniou, Christos
    Bouros, Dimosthenes
    CHEST, 2013, 144 (04)
  • [45] Protein overexpression and gene amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor in nonsmall cell lung carcinomas - An immunohistomchemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization study
    Suzuki, S
    Dobashi, Y
    Sakurai, H
    Nishikawa, K
    Hanawa, M
    Ooi, A
    CANCER, 2005, 103 (06) : 1265 - 1273
  • [46] Predicting gefitinib responsiveness in lung cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR and HER2 in biopsy and cytology specimens
    Daniele, Lorenzo
    Macri, Luigia
    Schena, Marina
    Dongiovanni, Diego
    Bonello, Lisa
    Armando, Enrico
    Ciuffreda, Libero
    Bertetto, Oscar
    Bussolati, Gianni
    Sapino, Anna
    MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 6 (04) : 1223 - 1229
  • [47] Increased EGFR gene copy number detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization predicts outcome in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with cetuximab and chemotherapy
    Hirsch, Fred R.
    Herbst, Roy S.
    Olsen, Christine
    Chansky, Kari
    Crowley, John
    Kelly, Karen
    Franklin, Wilbur A.
    Bunn, Paul A., Jr.
    Varella-Garcia, Marileila
    Gandara, David R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (20) : 3351 - 3357
  • [48] Improved methods for in situ enzymatic amplification and detection of low copy number genes in bacteria
    Jacobs, D
    Angles, ML
    Goodman, AE
    Neilan, BA
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 1997, 152 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [49] EGFR Gene Status in Cytological Samples of Nonsmall Cell Lung Carcinoma Controversies and Opportunities
    Santos, Gilda da Cunha
    Saieg, Mauro Ajaj
    Geddie, William
    Leighl, Natasha
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 119 (02) : 80 - 91
  • [50] MET Copy Number by Dual Color Brightfield In Situ Hybridization and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Correlates with Met Protein Expression in Lung Adenocarcinomas
    Sholl, L.
    Sun, H.
    Ligon, A.
    Butaney, M.
    Janne, P. A.
    Rodig, S.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 467A - 467A