Impact of the BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts on different responses to Imatinib and disease recurrence in Iranian patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

被引:10
|
作者
Rostami, Golale [1 ]
Hamid, Mohammad [1 ]
Jalaeikhoo, Hasan [2 ]
机构
[1] Pasteur Inst Iran, Biotechnol Res Ctr, Dept Mol Med, Tehran 1316943551, Iran
[2] AJA Univ Med Sci, ACRC, Tehran, Iran
关键词
BCR-ABL1; transcript; Chronic Myeloid Leukemia; Clinical outcome; Imatinib mesylate; Treatment responses; CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; HYBRID MESSENGER-RNA; BCR-ABL; CHRONIC-PHASE; CYTOGENETIC RESPONSE; NO CORRELATION; BREAKPOINT; MESYLATE; DURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gene.2017.06.018
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: One genomic breakpoint can result in variable BCR-ABL1 transcript types due to alternative splicing. The influence of different BCR-ABL1 transcript types on clinical outcome is still controversial. Aim of the study: The objective of this analysis was to determine the impact of transcript type on response, clinical outcome, recurrence risk after treatment with Imatinib mesylate in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients. Methods: Sixty CML patients in chronic phase were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and banding standard protocols. Results: There was a significant difference in collective incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CCR) between the e14a2 and e13a2 groups (P = 0.04). The median time to achieve CCR was shorter in e14a2 patients than to e13a2 (P = 0.01). This finding is paralleled by the molecular response where the median of the BCR-ABL1/ABL1 expression levels were significantly lower in e14a2 transcript compared to e13a2 type at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the start of therapy (P < 0.01). The probability of recurrence after treatment discontinuation was 9.33 fold higher in e13a2 transcript, that is reported here for the first time (chi 2 = 5.49; P = 0.01; OR: 9.33; 95% CI: 1.59, 54.67). No significant difference was observed regarding overall survival (OS), although Patients with e14a2 transcript displayed a significant tendency toward a higher event free survival (EFS) ratio (P = 0.03). Conclusion: We found that patients with the e14a2 transcript achieved better and faster responses to Imatinib mesylate. In this study, parallel data regarding molecular and cytogenetic responses, impact of transcript type on the probability of recurrence might suggest a general outcome that the type of transcript can be used as a prognostic marker at diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 206
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Emerging kinetics of BCR-ABL1 mutations and their effect on disease outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with imatinib failure
    Shih, Lee-Yung
    Kuo, Ming-Chung
    Kuo, Ching-Yuan
    Lin, Tseng-Hsi
    Bai, Li-Yaun
    Chen, Tsai-Yun
    Wang, Ming-Chung
    Lin, Tung-Liang
    Lan, Yii-Jenq
    Chen, Chih-Cheng
    Yang, Youngsen
    Hsiao, Pei-Ching
    Lai, Chang-Liang
    Chang, Chia-Hui
    Lin, Tung-Huei
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2013, 37 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [22] Dynamics of BCR-ABL1 transcripts during nilotinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
    Quintas-Cardama, Alfonso
    Kantarjian, Hagop
    Jones, Dan
    O'Brien, Susan
    Rios, Mary Beth
    Cortes, Jorge
    BLOOD, 2007, 110 (11) : 870A - 870A
  • [23] Clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of chronic myeloid leukemia with rare BCR-ABL1 transcripts
    Xue, Mengxing
    Wang, Qinrong
    Hu, Li
    Wen, Lijun
    Yang, Xiaofei
    Wu, Qian
    Pan, Jinlan
    Cen, Jiannong
    Ruan, Changgeng
    Wu, Depei
    Chen, Suning
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2019, 60 (12) : 3051 - 3057
  • [24] Guidelines for the measurement of BCR-ABL1 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukaemia
    Foroni, Letizia
    Wilson, Gill
    Gerrard, Gareth
    Mason, Joanne
    Grimwade, David
    White, Helen E.
    de Castro, David Gonzalez
    Austin, Stephen
    Awan, Abida
    Burt, Emma
    Clench, Tim
    Farruggia, Joanna
    Hancock, Jeremy
    Irvine, Alexandra E.
    Kizilors, Aytug
    Langabeer, Stephen
    Milner, Benedict J.
    Nickless, Guillermina
    Schuh, Anna
    Sproul, Anne
    Wang, Lihui
    Wickham, Caroline
    Cross, Nicholas C. P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2011, 153 (02) : 179 - 190
  • [25] DOES THE TYPE OF BCR-ABL1 FUSION TRANSCRIPT REALLY IMPACT ON THE RESPONSE IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA?
    Tahlan, Anita
    Varma, Neelam
    Naseem, Shano
    Binota, Jogeshwar
    Malhotra, Pankaj
    Bansal, Deepak
    Varma, Subhash
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2014, 36 : 108 - 109
  • [26] Frequency of BCR-ABL fusion transcripts in Serbian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia
    Todoric-Zivanovic, B.
    Strnad, M.
    Stamatovic, D.
    Tukic, L.
    Krtolica, K.
    Tatomirovic, Z.
    Djordjevic, V.
    Bogdanovic, A.
    Jankovic, G.
    Magic, Z.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2011, 16 (01): : 104 - 107
  • [27] Unusual location of BCR-ABL1 fusion sequences in a chronic myeloid leukemia patient
    Zamecnikova, Adriana
    Al Bahar, Soad
    Pandita, Ramesh
    HEMATOLOGY, 2012, 17 (06) : 321 - 324
  • [28] The Impact of BCR-ABL1 Transcript Type on Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Responses and Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
    Ercaliskan, Abdulkadir
    Eskazan, A. Emre
    CANCER, 2018, 124 (19) : 3806 - 3818
  • [29] Comparison Of BCR-ABL1/ABL1 and BCR-ABL1/GUS Ratios At Different Clinical Decision Cut-Offs In Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients On Imatinib
    Huet, Sarah
    Souche, Denis
    Magaud, Jean-Pierre
    Cony-Makhoul, Pascale
    Guillermin, Yann
    Heiblig, Mael
    Michallet, Mauricette
    Nicolini, Franck E.
    Hayette, Sandrine
    BLOOD, 2013, 122 (21)
  • [30] BCR-ABL1 transcript decline ratio combined BCR-ABL1IS as a precise predictor for imatinib response and outcome in the patients with chronic myeloid leukemia
    Cai, Zhimei
    Jia, Xiting
    Zi, Jie
    Song, Huihui
    Wang, Shujun
    McGrath, Mary
    Zhao, Lidong
    Song, Chunhua
    Ge, Zheng
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 11 (08): : 2234 - 2240