Peer review of manuscripts

被引：0
|
作者：
Kozak, Marcin [1 ]
机构：
[1] Warsaw Univ Life Sci, Dept Biometry & Bioinformat, PL-02787 Warsaw, Poland
来源：
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2008年 / 94卷 / 04期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：426 / 426
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts
    Balistreri, William F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2007, 151 (02): : 107 - 108
  • [32] Peer Review of Manuscripts Submitted Via the Academy Fellowship Track
    Casadevall, Arturo
    Collier, R. John
    [J]. MBIO, 2011, 2 (03):
  • [33] ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MANUSCRIPTS AS AN AID IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
    SPRING, JD
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 194 : 19 - CINF
  • [34] Peer review and manuscripts management in scientific journals: guidelines for good practice
    Gimenez Toledo, Elea
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA, 2009, 32 (01): : 117 - 119
  • [35] Efficiency in managing peer-review of scientific manuscripts – editors’ perspective
    Nedić, Olgica
    Drvenica, Ivana
    Ausloos, Marcel
    Dekanski, Aleksandar
    [J]. arXiv, 2019,
  • [36] Peer-Review and Rejection Causes in Submitting Original Medical Manuscripts
    Mendiola Pastrana, Indira Rocio
    Vargas Hernandez, Adriana
    Perez Manjarrez, Francia Estefania
    Ortiz Lopez, Eduardo
    Fernanda Romero-Henriquez, Luisa
    Lopez-Ortiz, Geovani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2020, 40 (03) : 182 - 186
  • [37] Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts
    van Rooyen, S
    Black, N
    Godlee, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 52 (07) : 625 - 629
  • [38] How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?
    Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
    Salgado, Teresa M.
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    [J]. PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA, 2020, 18 (01):
  • [39] Efficiency in managing peer-review of scientific manuscripts - Editors' perspective
    Nedic, Olgica
    Drvenica, Ivana
    Ausloos, Marcel
    Dekanski, Aleksandar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SERBIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 83 (12) : 1391 - 1405
  • [40] PEER-REVIEW IS AN EFFECTIVE SCREENING PROCESS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
    ABBY, M
    MASSEY, MD
    GALANDIUK, S
    POLK, HC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (02): : 105 - 107
12345