Study protocol to develop a core outcome set for thyroid dysfunction to bridge the unmet needs of patient-centred care

被引:2
|
作者
Ooi, Cheow Peng [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Abdul Hanif Khan Yusof [3 ]
Manaf, Rosliza Abdul [4 ]
Mustafa, Norlaila [5 ]
Sukor, Norlela [5 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [6 ]
Kamaruddin, Nor Azmi [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Dept Med, Endocrine Unit, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Pusat Perubatan Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Dept Med, Endocrine Unit, Cheras, Malaysia
[3] Univ Putra Malaysia, Dept Neurol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
[4] Univ Putra Malaysia, Community Hlth, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
[5] Pusat Perubatan Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Dept Med, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[6] Univ Liverpool, Biostat, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 07期
关键词
thyroid disease; statistics & research methods; general medicine (see internal medicine); DEBATE SERIES; HYPERTHYROIDISM; GENERALIZABILITY; CREDIBILITY; INSTRUMENTS; CONTROVERSY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050231
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Thyroid dysfunctions (TD) are common medical conditions affecting all global populations. Improved healthcare leading to increasing survival rates and delayed diagnosis rendered significant burden of the disease in the increasing number of patients with TD with comorbid illnesses. Therefore, reducing the burden of TD and improving the quality of care are crucial. Existing poor-quality data that guide evidence-based decisions only provide a fragmented picture of clinical care. The different outcomes across studies assessing the effectiveness of treatments impede our ability to synthesise results for determining the most efficient treatments. This project aims to produce a core outcome set (COS), which embeds the multiple complex dimensions of routine clinical care for the effectiveness studies and clinical care of adult patients with TD. Methods and analysis This mixed-method project has two phases. In phase 1, we will identify a list of patient-reported and clinical outcomes through qualitative research and systematic reviews. In phase 2, we will categorise the identified outcomes using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy of core domains and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. We will develop questionnaires from the list of outcomes identified from each domain for the two-round online Delphi exercise, aiming to reach a consensus on the COS. The Delphi process will include patients, carers, researchers and healthcare participants. We will hold an online consensus meeting involving representatives of all key stakeholders to establish the final COS. Ethics and dissemination The study has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects, Universiti Putra Malaysia and the Research Ethics Committee, National University of Malaysia. This proposed COS in TD will improve the value of data, facilitate high-quality evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making. Furthermore, we will present the results to participants, in peer-reviewed academic journals and conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study protocol for a mixed methods exploratory investigation of aftercare services for gestational diabetes in women to develop a new patient-centred model in Germany: the GestDiNa_basic study
    Greiner, Gregory Gordon
    Viehmann, Anja
    Linnenkamp, Ute
    Wilm, Stefan
    Leve, Verena
    Neuenschwander, Manuela
    Kuss, Oliver
    Fehm, Tanja
    Ensenauer, Regina
    Schumacher, Liesa
    Lange, Ute
    Mueller-Boessmann, Dorit
    Lappe, Veronika
    Ihle, Peter
    Adamczewski, Heinke
    Kaltheuner, Matthias
    Tamayo, Miguel
    Graefe, Viola
    Westerhoff, Benjamin
    Wallerich-Herf, Nadine
    Schellhammer, Stefanie
    Kerres, Thomas
    Schmitz-Losem, Imke
    Cramer, Stefan
    Rupprecht, Christoph J.
    Klueppelholz, Birgit
    Meyer, Frank
    Koch-Schulte, Simone
    Juengling, Ute
    Icks, Andrea
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [22] An innovative approach to develop, deploy and evaluate personalised, patient-centred, outcome measurement: an international, multicentered study with the CLEFT-Q Computerised Adaptive Test
    Harrison, Conrad
    Apon, Inge
    Ardouin, Kenny
    Sidey-Gibbons, Chris
    Klassen, Anne
    Cano, Stefan
    Riff, Karen Wong
    Pusic, Andrea
    Versnel, Sarah
    Koudstaal, Maarten
    Allori, Alexander
    Rogers-Vizena, Carolyn
    Swan, Marc
    Furniss, Dominic
    Rodrigues, Jeremy
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S17 - S18
  • [23] COMPANION: development of a patient-centred complexity and casemix classification for adult palliative care patients based on needs and resource use - a protocol for a cross- sectional multi-centre study
    Hodiamont, Farina
    Schatz, Caroline
    Gesell, Daniela
    Leidl, Reiner
    Boulesteix, Anne-Laure
    Nauck, Friedemann
    Wikert, Julia
    Jansky, Maximiliane
    Kranz, Steven
    Bausewein, Claudia
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [24] COMPANION: development of a patient-centred complexity and casemix classification for adult palliative care patients based on needs and resource use – a protocol for a cross-sectional multi-centre study
    Farina Hodiamont
    Caroline Schatz
    Daniela Gesell
    Reiner Leidl
    Anne-Laure Boulesteix
    Friedemann Nauck
    Julia Wikert
    Maximiliane Jansky
    Steven Kranz
    Claudia Bausewein
    BMC Palliative Care, 21
  • [25] Developing a Core Outcome Set for Prognostic Research in Palliative Cancer Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
    Spooner, Caitlin
    Vivat, Bella
    White, Nicola
    Stone, Patrick
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [26] Using normalization process theory to evaluate the use of patient-centred outcome measures in specialist palliative home care—a qualitative interview study
    Eva Lehmann-Emele
    Maximiliane Jansky
    Sabina Clapham
    Susanne de Wolf-Linder
    Claudia Bausewein
    Farina Hodiamont
    BMC Palliative Care, 23
  • [27] Understanding how a palliative-specific patient-reported outcome intervention works to facilitate patient-centred care in advanced heart failure: A qualitative study
    Kane, Pauline M.
    Ellis-Smith, Clare I.
    Daveson, Barbara A.
    Ryan, Karen
    Mahon, Niall G.
    McAdam, Brendan
    McQuillan, Regina
    Tracey, Cecelia
    Howley, Christine
    O'Gara, Geraldine
    Raleigh, Caroline
    Higginson, Irene J.
    Murtagh, Fliss Em
    Koffman, Jonathan
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (01) : 143 - 155
  • [28] Using normalization process theory to evaluate the use of patient-centred outcome measures in specialist palliative home care-a qualitative interview study
    Lehmann-Emele, Eva
    Jansky, Maximiliane
    Clapham, Sabina
    de Wolf-Linder, Susanne
    Bausewein, Claudia
    Hodiamont, Farina
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [29] Agreement on what to measure in randomised controlled trials in burn care: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set
    Young, Amber
    Brookes, Sara
    Rumsey, Nichola
    Blazeby, Jane
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (06):
  • [30] Patient-centred care during the COVID-19 pandemic Protocol for a qualitative collective case study by high-performing general practice teams
    Brickley, Bryce
    Williams, Lauren T.
    Morgan, Mark
    Ross, Alyson
    Trigger, Kellie
    Ball, Lauren
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 51 (1-2) : 77 - 81