Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey

被引:17
|
作者
Grubenhoff, Joseph A. [1 ]
Ziniel, Sonja, I [1 ]
Cifra, Christina L. [2 ]
Singhal, Geeta [3 ]
McClead, Richard E. [4 ]
Singh, Hardeep [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Pediat, Carver Coll Med Stead Family, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Ctr Innovat Qual Effectiveness & Safety, Houston, TX USA
[6] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
EMOTIONAL IMPACT; MEDICAL ERRORS; PHYSICIANS; MORBIDITY; ACCOUNTABILITY; ORGANIZATIONS; PROGRESS; CULTURE; QUALITY; RATES;
D O I
10.1097/pq9.0000000000000259
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction: Meaningful conversations about diagnostic errors require safety cultures where clinicians are comfortable discussing errors openly. However, clinician comfort discussing diagnostic errors publicly and barriers to these discussions remain unexplored. We compared clinicians' comfort discussing diagnostic errors to other medical errors and identified barriers to open discussion. Methods: Pediatric clinicians at 4 hospitals were surveyed between May and June 2018. The survey assessed respondents' comfort discussing medical errors (with varying degrees of system versus individual clinician responsibility) during morbidity and mortality conferences and privately with peers. Respondents reported the most significant barriers to discussing diagnostic errors publicly. Poststratification weighting accounted for nonresponse bias; the Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment was applied to control for false discovery (significance set at P < 0.018). Results: Clinicians (n = 838; response rate 22.6%) were significantly less comfortable discussing all error types during morbidity and mortality conferences than privately (P < 0.004) and significantly less comfortable discussing diagnostic errors compared with other medical errors (P < 0.018). Comfort did not differ by clinician type or years in practice; clinicians at one institution were significantly less comfortable discussing diagnostic errors compared with peers at other institutions. The most frequently cited barriers to discussing diagnostic errors publicly included feeling like a bad clinician, loss of reputation, and peer judgment of knowledge base and decision-making. Conclusions: Clinicians are more uncomfortable discussing diagnostic errors than other types of medical errors. The most frequent barriers involve the public perception of clinical performance. Addressing this aspect of safety culture may improve clinician participation in efforts to reduce harm from diagnostic errors.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring and Improving Diagnostic Safety in Primary Care: Addressing the “Twin” Pandemics of Diagnostic Error and Clinician Burnout
    Andrew P. J. Olson
    Mark Linzer
    Gordon D. Schiff
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 1404 - 1406
  • [22] Measuring and Improving Diagnostic Safety in Primary Care: Addressing the "Twin" Pandemics of Diagnostic Error and Clinician Burnout
    Olson, Andrew P. J.
    Linzer, Mark
    Schiff, Gordon D.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (05) : 1404 - 1406
  • [23] Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors: Year 2 findings
    Raab, SS
    Zarbo, R
    Geyer, S
    Jensen, C
    Grzybicki, DM
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2005, 18 : 325A - 325A
  • [24] Medication errors record as an improving measure on patient safety at a university hospital
    Nogue, E.
    Esteban, J.
    Andreu, A.
    Bosch, M.
    Bonafont, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2016, 38 (02) : 550 - 550
  • [25] Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors: Year 2 findings
    Raab, SS
    Zarbo, R
    Geyer, S
    Jensen, C
    Grzybicki, DM
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2005, 85 : 325A - 325A
  • [26] Improving Patient Safety by Reusing Clinical Routine Data - An Expert Survey on Patient Safety Indicators
    Schaller, Michael
    Hackl, Werner O.
    Ammenwerth, Elske
    HEALTH INFORMATICS MEETS EHEALTH: BIOMEDICAL MEETS EHEALTH - FROM SENSORS TO DECISIONS, 2018, 248 : 300 - 306
  • [27] Improving Patient Safety and Clinician Workflow in the General Care Setting With Enhanced Surveillance Monitoring
    McGrath, Susan P.
    Perreard, Irina M.
    Garlan, Melissa D.
    Converse, Kelli A.
    Mackenzie, Todd A.
    IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2019, 23 (02) : 857 - 866
  • [28] A clinician survey: diagnostic utility, impact on patient management, and outcomes of clinical exome sequencing
    McWalter, K.
    Cho, M.
    Juusola, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 693 - 693
  • [29] Pediatric patient safety in resuscitation simulations - Lessons learned from studying clinician behavior
    Hohenhaus, SM
    Frush, KES
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2005, 21 (01) : 71 - 75
  • [30] A return to practice survey: improving patient safety and enhancingtrainee support
    McGhee, L. C.
    Gibb, S. C.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 : 22 - 22