Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife: An anatomical study

被引:7
|
作者
Qiu, Zuyun [1 ]
Li, Hui [2 ]
Shen, Yifeng [3 ]
Jia, Yan [2 ]
Sun, Xiaojie [2 ]
Zhou, Qiaoyin [4 ]
Li, Shiliang [2 ]
Zhang, Weiguang [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jishuitan Hosp, Dept Tradit Chinese Med Bone Setting, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Acupuncture & Moxibust, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Hosp Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Tradit Chinese Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Chinese Med Coll, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Dept Human Anat, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
stenosing flexor tenosynovitis; needle-knife; anatomy; percutaneous release; ultrasound-guided technique; a1; pulley; trigger finger; TRIGGER-FINGER;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.967400
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife.Methods: The author performed percutaneous A1 pulley release in 84 cadaveric hands fixed with 10% formalin. The cadaveric hands were divided into three groups: 28 hands in each group (group U: ultrasound-guided needle knife pushing group, group N: non-ultrasound-guided needle knife pushing group, group T: classical needle knife operation puncture group). Percutaneous A1 pulley release was performed, the soft tissue was dissected layer by layer, and the relevant anatomical data were measured.Results: The injured cases were as follows: group U, 29 (20.7%); group N, 36 (25.7%); and group T, 28 (20.0%). There is no significant difference between different tissue injury types in different intervention methods. The missed release cases were as follows: group U, 8 (5.7%); group N, 4 (2.9%); and group T, 13 (9.3%). The percentage of released A1 pulley were as follows: group U, 71.4%+/- 30.7%; group N, 66.0%+/- 20.3%; and group T, 61.0%+/- 30.4%. The percentage of released A1 pulley of the three groups were compared: group U > group N > group T, and there was statistical difference between the three groups. The full release rates of the three groups were compared: group U(31.4%) > group N(15.7%) > group T(13.6%), and there were significant difference in the full release of A1 pulley between group U and group T, group N.Conclusion: Based on the cadaver specimen, the length and percentage of released A1 pulley is longer by ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle-knife. and there was no statistical difference in the injury rate between the three techniques.Type of Study and Clinical Relevance: Clinical anatomic study. To test the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife in cadaveric hands, and provide an anatomically based support in clinic.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Sonographically Guided Percutaneous First Annular Pulley Release Cadaveric Safety Study of Needle and Knife Techniques
    Smith, Jay
    Rizzo, Marco
    Lai, Jim K.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (11) : 1531 - 1542
  • [12] Treatment of Trigger finger by ultrasound-guided needle release of a1 pulley: A series of 105 cases
    Chopin, Clement
    Le Guillou, Adrien
    Salmon, Jean Hugues
    Lellouche, Henri
    Richette, Pascal
    Maillet, Jeremy
    JOINT BONE SPINE, 2022, 89 (06)
  • [13] Ultrasound-guided percutaneous opening of the A1 pulley with surgical knife on anterograde versus retrograde approach: A comparative cadaver study (40 fingers)
    Pages, Laure
    Cambon, Adeline
    HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2023, 42 (06): : 512 - 516
  • [14] Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release of the annular pulley in trigger digit
    Rajeswaran, Gajan
    Lee, Justin C.
    Eckersley, Rupert
    Katsarma, Effie
    Healy, Jeremiah C.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (09) : 2232 - 2237
  • [15] Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release of the annular pulley in trigger digit
    Gajan Rajeswaran
    Justin C. Lee
    Rupert Eckersley
    Effie Katsarma
    Jeremiah C. Healy
    European Radiology, 2009, 19 : 2232 - 2237
  • [16] Percutaneous ultrasound guided A1 pulley release. Part II: Intravaginal technique
    Rojo Manaute, J. M.
    Igualada Blazquez, C.
    Lopez Soto, V
    de las Heras Sanchez-Heredero, J.
    Del Cerro Gutierrez, M.
    Vaquero Martin, J.
    TRAUMA-SPAIN, 2010, 21 (03): : 141 - 149
  • [17] Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Carpal Tunnel Release: Study Upon Clinical Efficacy and Safety
    Petrover, David
    Silvera, Jonathan
    De Baere, Thierry
    Vigan, Marie
    Hakime, Antoine
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 40 (04) : 568 - 575
  • [18] Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Carpal Tunnel Release: Study Upon Clinical Efficacy and Safety
    David Petrover
    Jonathan Silvera
    Thierry De Baere
    Marie Vigan
    Antoine Hakimé
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2017, 40 : 568 - 575
  • [19] PERCUTANEOUS A1 PULLEY RELEASE - A CADAVERIC STUDY
    BAIN, GI
    TURNBULL, J
    CHARLES, MN
    ROTH, JH
    RICHARDS, RS
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1995, 20A (05): : 781 - 784
  • [20] Percutaneous Release of the A1 Pulley: A Cadaver Study
    Habbu, Rohan
    Putnam, Matthew D.
    Adams, Julie E.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 37A (11): : 2273 - 2277