Evaluation and Comparison of the Part Load Behaviour of the CO2 Capture Technologies Oxyfuel and Post-Combustion

被引:8
|
作者
Roeder, Volker [1 ]
Hasenbein, Christoph [1 ]
Kather, Alfons [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamburg Univ Technol, Inst Energy Syst, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany
来源
GHGT-11 | 2013年 / 37卷
关键词
Power plant; Part load; Oft-design; CO2; capture; CCS; Post-combustion; Oxyfuel;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.123
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The rising share of fluctuating renewable energies increasingly demand flexible and part load operation of fossil-fuelled power plants with and without CCS. In this work the part load behaviour of the Oxyfuel and the post-combustion CO2 capture processes are evaluated and compared. The net efficiency of the conventional hard-coal-fired power plant decreases from 45.2% at full load to 41.6% at 40% load. The net efficiency with post-combustion CO2 capture using 7 m MEA as solvent decreases to 34.7% at full load and 30.2% at 40% load. The Oxyfuel process reaches in turn a net efficiency of 36.6% at full load and 32.3% at 40% load and shows therefore a benefit of 1.9%-points at full load compared to the post-combustion CO2 capture with MEA. The efficiency advantage of the Oxyfuel process compared to the post-combustion CO2 capture process remains constant at part load. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2420 / 2431
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THERMOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF CO2 COMPRESSION STRATEGIES FOR POST-COMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE APPLICATIONS
    Botero, Cristina
    Finkenrath, Matthias
    Belloni, Clarissa
    Bertolo, Simone
    D'Ercole, Michele
    Gori, Enrico
    Tacconelli, Remo
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME TURBO EXPO 2009, VOL 4, 2009, : 517 - 526
  • [22] Mesoporous silsesquioxane for post-combustion capture of CO2
    Esam, Odette
    Vasiliev, Aleksey
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 247
  • [23] Post-combustion CO2 capture with biomimetic membrane
    Thibaud-Erkey, Catherine
    Cordatos, Harry
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 241
  • [24] Exergetic and Exergoeconomic Analysis of Three Different Technologies for Post-combustion CO2 Capture
    Ferrarra, Giandomenico
    Ho, Minh T.
    Lanzini, Andrea
    Leone, Pierluigi
    Wiley, Dianne E.
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 6455 - 6464
  • [25] CO2 Post-combustion Capture: A Critical Review of Current Technologies and Future Directions
    Raganati, Federica
    Ammendola, Paola
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2024, 38 (15) : 13858 - 13905
  • [26] An evaluation of carbon-based adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture
    Yapici, Ece
    Akgun, Hasret
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Banar, Mufide
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2023, 29 (03) : 265 - 277
  • [27] Li-LSX-zeolite evaluation for post-combustion CO2 capture
    Kodasma, Rasmus
    Fermoso, Javier
    Sanna, Aimaro
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2019, 358 : 1351 - 1362
  • [28] Evaluation of reclaimer sludge disposal from post-combustion CO2 capture
    Sexton, A.
    Dombrowski, K.
    Nielsen, P.
    Rochelle, G.
    Fisher, K.
    Youngerman, J.
    Chen, E.
    Singh, P.
    Davison, J.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 926 - 939
  • [29] Part 8: Post-combustion CO2 capture: pilot plant operation issues
    Gelowitz, Don
    Supap, Teeradet
    Abdulaziz, Naami
    Sema, Teerawat
    Idem, Raphael
    Tontiwachwuthikul, Paitoon
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2013, 4 (02) : 215 - 231
  • [30] Operational optimization for part-load performance of amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture processes
    Oh, Se-Young
    Kim, Jin-Kuk
    ENERGY, 2018, 146 : 57 - 66