The effect duration of candesartan cilexetil once daily, in comparison with enalapril once daily, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension

被引:26
|
作者
Himmelmann, A [1 ]
Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S
Wester, A
Redón, J
Asmar, R
Hedner, T
机构
[1] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Dept Publ Hlth Sci & Gen Practice, Oulu, Finland
[3] Midden Twente Ziekenhuis, Hengelo, Netherlands
[4] Univ Valencia, Hosp Clin, Valencia, Spain
[5] Inst Cardiovasc, Paris, France
关键词
ACE inhibitor; angiotensin receptor blocker; antihypertensive; candesartan cilexetil; enalapril; hypertension;
D O I
10.1080/080370501750183381
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the antihypertensive efficacy, effect duration and safety of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker candesartan cilexetil and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril once daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Methods: A multicenter, randomised, double-blind parallel group study was performed in Finland, France, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden, Three-hundred-and-ninety-five men and women in the age range :20-80 years with primary hypertension were randomised to an 8-week double-blind treatment period with either candesartan cilexetil 8-16 mg or enalapril 10-20 mg once daily, with forced dose titration after 4 weeks. Non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure was measured for 36 h at baseline and after 8 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in mean diastolic and systolic ambulatory blood pressure 22-24 h post-dose. Results: There was a significant difference in the adjusted mean difference for the change from baseline to week 8 between candesartan cilexetil and enalapril 22-24 h post-dose by -3.5 mmHg (95% confidence interval, CI: -6.8 to -0.3 mmHg; p <0.032) in ambulatory systolic blood pressure and -3.0 mmHg (95% CI: -5.1 to -0.8 mmHg; p < 0.008) in ambulatory diastolic blood pressure. There was a significant difference in adjusted mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure 24-36 h post-dose by -4.2 mmHg (95% CI: -6.8 to -1.6 mmHg; p < 0.002)/-3.5 mmHg (95% CI: -5.1 to -1.8 mmHg; p < 0.001). Both drugs were generally well tolerated. Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest that advantages may be attributed to the use of candesartan cilexetil, as compared to enalapril in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. In comparison with enalapril 20 mg, candesartan cilexetil 16 mg more effectively lowered blood pressure at trough and in particular on the day following the day after the last dose.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 51
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ONCE DAILY TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION WITH XIPAMID - CONTROLLED-STUDY
    WEBER, JCP
    BIRD, H
    COSH, J
    DAVIES, PS
    DIXON, ASJ
    LISTER, J
    PETTS, HV
    PRICHARD, BNC
    RAFTERY, EB
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1977, 4 (03) : 283 - 288
  • [32] Once-daily telmisartan compared with enalapril in the treatment of hypertension
    Smith, DHG
    Neutel, JM
    Morgenstern, P
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 1998, 15 (04) : 229 - 240
  • [33] COMPARISON OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ONCE-DAILY TERAZOSIN VERSUS TWICE-DAILY PRAZOSIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    DEGER, G
    CUTLER, RE
    DIETZ, AJ
    LEWIN, AJ
    VLACHAKIS, N
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 80 (5B): : 62 - 67
  • [34] Comparison of once-daily mometasone furoate versus once-daily budesonide in patients with moderate persistent asthma
    Corren, J
    Berkowitz, R
    Murray, JJ
    Prenner, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2003, 57 (07) : 567 - 572
  • [35] COMPARISON OF ONCE-DAILY GUANFACINE AND TWICE-A-DAY METHYLDOPA IN THE TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    FAROOKI, MS
    FARSKY, K
    BOUCHARD, S
    LALONDE, Y
    BROOKMAN, S
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1985, 7 (02) : 199 - 204
  • [36] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF ONCE-DAILY BOPINDOLOL AND ATENOLOL FOR MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    COLNAGO, R
    MEREGALLI, M
    TURRI, D
    NAZZARI, M
    FIORELLA, G
    UFFANTI, EE
    MAZZOLA, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1987, 25 (06) : 347 - 352
  • [37] SIMILAR ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFECT OF ONCE-DAILY AND TWICE-DAILY ENALAPRIL
    SARIS, S
    AFFRIME, MB
    LOWENTHAL, DT
    IRVIN, J
    VIAU, J
    DICKERMAN, D
    ONESTI, G
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1983, 31 (02): : A334 - A334
  • [38] COMPARISON OF ONCE AND TWICE DAILY ATENOLOL IN HYPERTENSION
    CASTLEDEN, CM
    DATHAN, JRE
    GEORGE, CF
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1977, 53 (625) : 679 - 682
  • [39] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ONCE-DAILY CARVEDILOL VS TWICE-DAILY LABETALOL IN MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    OLLIVIER, JP
    DURIER, P
    BUSSIERE, JL
    GAYET, JL
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 38 : S164 - S166
  • [40] A COMPARISON OF ONCE-DAILY ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY WITH CAPTOPRIL AND ENALAPRIL
    GARANIN, G
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1986, 40 (03): : 567 - 575