The effect duration of candesartan cilexetil once daily, in comparison with enalapril once daily, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension

被引:26
|
作者
Himmelmann, A [1 ]
Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S
Wester, A
Redón, J
Asmar, R
Hedner, T
机构
[1] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Dept Publ Hlth Sci & Gen Practice, Oulu, Finland
[3] Midden Twente Ziekenhuis, Hengelo, Netherlands
[4] Univ Valencia, Hosp Clin, Valencia, Spain
[5] Inst Cardiovasc, Paris, France
关键词
ACE inhibitor; angiotensin receptor blocker; antihypertensive; candesartan cilexetil; enalapril; hypertension;
D O I
10.1080/080370501750183381
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the antihypertensive efficacy, effect duration and safety of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker candesartan cilexetil and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril once daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Methods: A multicenter, randomised, double-blind parallel group study was performed in Finland, France, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden, Three-hundred-and-ninety-five men and women in the age range :20-80 years with primary hypertension were randomised to an 8-week double-blind treatment period with either candesartan cilexetil 8-16 mg or enalapril 10-20 mg once daily, with forced dose titration after 4 weeks. Non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure was measured for 36 h at baseline and after 8 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in mean diastolic and systolic ambulatory blood pressure 22-24 h post-dose. Results: There was a significant difference in the adjusted mean difference for the change from baseline to week 8 between candesartan cilexetil and enalapril 22-24 h post-dose by -3.5 mmHg (95% confidence interval, CI: -6.8 to -0.3 mmHg; p <0.032) in ambulatory systolic blood pressure and -3.0 mmHg (95% CI: -5.1 to -0.8 mmHg; p < 0.008) in ambulatory diastolic blood pressure. There was a significant difference in adjusted mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure 24-36 h post-dose by -4.2 mmHg (95% CI: -6.8 to -1.6 mmHg; p < 0.002)/-3.5 mmHg (95% CI: -5.1 to -1.8 mmHg; p < 0.001). Both drugs were generally well tolerated. Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest that advantages may be attributed to the use of candesartan cilexetil, as compared to enalapril in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. In comparison with enalapril 20 mg, candesartan cilexetil 16 mg more effectively lowered blood pressure at trough and in particular on the day following the day after the last dose.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 51
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ambulatory blood pressure assessment of once-daily candesartan cilexetil versus enalapril in patients with hypertension
    Himmelmann, A
    Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S
    Wester, A
    Redon, J
    Asmar, R
    Hedner, T
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 18 : S163 - S163
  • [2] COMPARISON OF DILEVALOL AND ENALAPRIL ADMINISTERED ONCE DAILY FOR MILD HYPERTENSION
    RODRIGUEZSAAVEDRA, M
    ZANNAD, FM
    GUERREROSIERRA, J
    SACK, DW
    RENAUD, H
    GUIDUCCI, U
    EDWARDS, LD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 63 (19): : I50 - I53
  • [3] Candesartan cilexetil: Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily administration for systemic hypertension
    Zuschke, CA
    Keys, I
    Munger, MA
    Carr, AA
    Marinides, GN
    Flanagan, TL
    Cushing, DJ
    Hayes, JL
    Michelson, EL
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 21 (03) : 464 - 474
  • [4] ONCE DAILY ENALAPRIL IN GENERAL-PRACTICE PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    CROMBIE, A
    MANSON, P
    MCVEY, D
    SMITH, MW
    SMEETON, VJ
    SOMERTON, DT
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 99 (805) : 503 - 504
  • [5] Candesartan cilexetil and enalapril are of equivalent efficacy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension
    Zanchetti, A
    Omboni, S
    DiBiagio, C
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 1997, 11 : S57 - S59
  • [6] COMPARISON OF ONCE-DAILY CAPTOPRIL OR ENALAPRIL IN MILD ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    PIXLEY, JS
    MARSHALL, MK
    STANLEY, H
    STARICH, GH
    FERGUSON, RK
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 29 (02): : 118 - 122
  • [7] A COMPARISON OF ONCE DAILY ATENOLOL AND METOPROLOL SA IN MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    MORLEY, CA
    CAVALCANTI, C
    PERRINS, EJ
    SUTTON, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1983, 15 (06) : 715 - 717
  • [8] ONCE DAILY AMLODIPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    WEBSTER, J
    ROBB, OJ
    JEFFERS, TA
    SCOTT, AK
    PETRIE, JC
    TOWLER, HM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 24 (06) : 713 - 719
  • [9] ONCE DAILY PROPRANOLOL IN TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    DOUGLASJONES, AP
    BABER, NS
    LEE, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1978, 14 (03) : 163 - 166
  • [10] EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT-DURATION OF ONCE-DAILY ENALAPRIL COMPARED WITH ONCE-DAILY CAPTOPRIL
    GERMANO, G
    DAMIANI, S
    GERMANO, U
    PECCHIOLI, V
    PICA, B
    ANTONINI, P
    NEPHRON, 1990, 55 : 65 - 69