Rhizobacterial community structure differences among sorghum cultivars in different growth stages and soils

被引:133
|
作者
Schlemper, Thiago R. [1 ,2 ]
Leite, Marcio F. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lucheta, Adriano R. [1 ]
Shimels, Mahdere [4 ]
Bouwmeester, Harro J. [5 ]
van Veen, Johannes A. [1 ,2 ]
Kuramae, Eiko E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Ecol NIOO KNAW, Dept Microbial Ecol, Droevendaalsesteeg 10, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Biol, NL-2333 BE Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Estadual Maranhao, Dept Agroecol, BR-65055970 Sao Luis, Brazil
[4] Wageningen Univ, Lab Plant Physiol, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Swammerdam Inst Life Sci, Plant Hormone Biol Grp, NL-1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Sorghum genotypes; rhizosphere; bacterial community composition; 16S rRNA; next-generation sequencing; strigolactone; BACTERIAL COMMUNITIES; RHIZOSPHERE MICROBIOME; PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY; PLANT GENOTYPE; STRIGOLACTONES; CROP; PRODUCTIVITY; SELECTION; PACKAGE; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1093/femsec/fix096
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Plant genotype selects the rhizosphere microbiome. The success of plant-microbe interactions is dependent on factors that directly or indirectly influence the plant rhizosphere microbial composition. We investigated the rhizosphere bacterial community composition of seven different sorghum cultivars in two different soil types (abandoned (CF) and agricultural (VD)). The rhizosphere bacterial community was evaluated at four different plant growth stages: emergence of the second (day 10) and third leaves (day 20), the transition between the vegetative and reproductive stages (day 35), and the emergence of the last visible leaf (day 50). At early stages (days 10 and 20), the sorghum rhizosphere bacterial community composition was mainly driven by soil type, whereas at late stages (days 35 and 50), the bacterial community composition was also affected by the sorghum genotype. Although this effect of sorghum genotype was small, different sorghum cultivars assembled significantly different bacterial community compositions. In CF soil, the striga-resistant cultivar had significantly higher relative abundances of Acidobacteria GP1, Burkholderia, Cupriavidus (Burkholderiaceae), Acidovorax and Albidiferax (Comamonadaceae) than the other six cultivars. This study is the first to simultaneously investigate the contributions of plant genotype, plant growth stage and soil type in shaping sorghum rhizosphere bacterial community composition.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Study on the community structure and function of symbiotic bacteria from different growth and developmental stages of Hypsizygus marmoreus
    Shujing Sun
    Fan Li
    Xin Xu
    Yunchao Liu
    Xuqiang Kong
    Jianqiu Chen
    Ting Liu
    Liding Chen
    BMC Microbiology, 20
  • [32] Study on the community structure and function of symbiotic bacteria from different growth and developmental stages ofHypsizygus marmoreus
    Sun, Shujing
    Li, Fan
    Xu, Xin
    Liu, Yunchao
    Kong, Xuqiang
    Chen, Jianqiu
    Liu, Ting
    Chen, Liding
    BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [33] Structure of the Bacterial Community in Different Stages of Early Childhood Caries
    Ximenes, Marcos
    de Armas, Rafael Dutra
    Triches, Thaisa Cezaria
    Cardoso, Mariane
    Vieira, Ricardo de Souza
    ORAL HEALTH & PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 16 (04) : 369 - 373
  • [34] Differences in Symptom Burden Among Cancer Patients With Different Stages of Cachexia
    Zhou, Ting
    Yang, Kaixiang
    Thapa, Sudip
    Liu, Huiquan
    Wang, Bangyan
    Yu, Shiying
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2017, 53 (05) : 919 - 926
  • [35] Microbial growth and community structure in acid mine soils after addition of different amendments for soil reclamation
    Zornoza, R.
    Acosta, J. A.
    Faz, A.
    Baath, E.
    GEODERMA, 2016, 272 : 64 - 72
  • [36] Differences in the growth stages of Erysiphe pisi on cultivars of field pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Su, H
    Hwang, SF
    Chang, KF
    Conner, RL
    Howard, RJ
    Turbull, GD
    Blade, SF
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2004, 111 (01): : 64 - 70
  • [37] SENSITIVITY TO DROUGHT STRESS OF 3 SOYBEAN CULTIVARS DURING DIFFERENT GROWTH-STAGES
    KPOGHOMOU, BK
    SAPRA, VT
    BEYL, CA
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 164 (02) : 104 - 109
  • [38] EFFECT OF INOCULATION WITH SELENOPHOMA-DONACIS AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGES ON SPRING BARLEY CULTIVARS
    BROKENSHIRE, T
    COOKE, BM
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1978, 89 (02) : 211 - 217
  • [39] Deviations of some nutrient concentrations in different parts of safflower cultivars during growth stages
    Erdal, I
    Baydar, H
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2005, 37 (03) : 601 - 611
  • [40] Diversity and distribution of the endophytic bacterial community at different stages of Eucalyptus growth
    Paulo Sérgio Balbino Miguel
    Marcelo Nagem Valério de Oliveira
    Júlio César Delvaux
    Guilherme Luiz de Jesus
    Arnaldo Chaer Borges
    Marcos Rogério Tótola
    Júlio César Lima Neves
    Maurício Dutra Costa
    Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2016, 109 : 755 - 771