Seismotectonic analysis of the 2017 moiyabana earthquake (Mw 6.5; Botswana), insights from field investigations, aftershock and InSAR studies

被引:4
|
作者
Mulabisana, T. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Meghraoui, M. [1 ]
Midzi, V. [2 ]
Saleh, M. [1 ,3 ]
Ntibinyane, O. [4 ]
Kwadiba, T. [4 ]
Manzunzu, B. [2 ]
Seiphemo, O. [4 ]
Pule, T. [2 ]
Saunders, I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strasbourg, CNRS, UMR 7063, EOST,ITES, Strasbourg, France
[2] Council Geosci, 280 Pretoria St, Pretoria, South Africa
[3] NRIAG, Helwan, Egypt
[4] Botswana Geosci Inst, Lobatse, Botswana
[5] Nelson Mandela Univ, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
关键词
Seismotectonics; Earthquake; Fault; Deformation; Mainshock; Aftershock; STABLE CONTINENTAL REGIONS; SEISMIC MOMENT ASSESSMENT; EAST-AFRICAN RIFT; SOUTHERN AFRICA; GEOPHYSICAL EVIDENCE; FAULT; KINEMATICS; CRUSTAL; MODEL; CONSTRAINTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2021.104297
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The April 3, 2017 M-w 6.5, Moiyabana (Botswana) earthquake occurred in the continental interior of the Nubian plate and in a seismogenic region previously considered as stable. Our objective is to combine several approaches (field and remote sensing investigations) in order to adopt a multidisciplinary strategy so as to enhance our understanding of earthquake occurrence in intraplate southern Africa. We analyse the mainshock and aftershocks sequence based on a local seismic network and local seismotectonic characteristics. The earthquake rupture geometry is constrained with more than 900 aftershocks recorded over a period of three months and from the InSAR analysis of Sentinel-1 images (ascending orbit). The mainshock (25.134 E, 22.565 5; depth 22 +/- 3 km) was followed by more than 500 events of magnitude M >= 0.8 recorded in April 2017 including the largest aftershock (M-w 4.6 on the April 5, 2017). Focal mechanism solutions of the mainshock and aftershocks display predominance of NW-SE trending and NE dipping normal faulting. Stress inversion of the focal mechanisms produced results that are compatible with a NE-SW extension under normal faulting regime. The InSAR study shows fringes (a pair of ascending images 2017-03-30 and 2017-04-11) with two lobes with 3.86 cm-5.15 cm coseismic slip on a NW-SE elongated and 40-km-long surface deformation consistent with the mainshock location and normal faulting mechanism. The modelling of surface deformation provides the earthquake rupture dimension at depth with similar to 50 cm maximum slip on a fault plane striking 315 degrees, dipping 45 degrees, -80 degrees rake and with M-o 3.68 x 10(18)( )Nm. Although the seismic strain rate is of low level, the occurrence of the 2017 Moiyabana earthquake, followed by an aftershock sequence in the central Limpopo Mobile Belt classifies the intraplate region as an active plate interior.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Seismic Sequences of the 2017 Mainling Mw 6.5 Earthquake: Imaging the Seismogenic Fault by Aftershock Analysis
    Weiping Wang
    Jiansi Yang
    Yanbin Wang
    [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2020, 177 : 3161 - 3174
  • [2] Seismic Sequences of the 2017 Mainling Mw 6.5 Earthquake: Imaging the Seismogenic Fault by Aftershock Analysis
    Wang, Weiping
    Yang, Jiansi
    Wang, Yanbin
    [J]. PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 177 (07) : 3161 - 3174
  • [3] Aeromagnetic, gravity, and Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar analyses reveal the causative fault of the 3 April 2017 Mw 6.5 Moiyabana, Botswana, earthquake
    Kolawole, F.
    Atekwana, E. A.
    Malloy, S.
    Stamps, D. S.
    Grandin, R.
    Abdelsalam, M. G.
    Leseane, K.
    Shemang, E. M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 44 (17) : 8837 - 8846
  • [4] Geodetic Model of the 2017 Mw 6.5 Mainling Earthquake Inferred from GPS and InSAR Data
    Jian, Huizi
    Wang, Lifeng
    Gan, Weijun
    Zhang, Keliang
    Li, Yanchuan
    Liang, Shiming
    Liu, Yunhua
    Gong, Wenyu
    Yin, Xinzhong
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (24)
  • [5] Localization of large intraplate earthquakes along faulted density-contrast boundaries: Insights from the 2017 Mw6.5 Botswana earthquake
    Chisenga, Chikondi
    Kolawole, Folarin
    Rajaonarison, Tahiry
    Atekwana, Estella A.
    Yan, Jianguo
    Shemang, Elisha M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 197
  • [6] The 2013 Mw 6.2 Shonbeh (Kaki) earthquake (Zagros-Iran): seismo-tectonic implications for the Kazerun shear transition zone from high-resolution aftershock and InSAR data analysis
    Yamini-Fard, F.
    Tatar, M.
    Fathian, A.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 238 (03) : 1451 - 1469
  • [7] Coseismic Deformation Field of the Mw 7.3 12 November 2017 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) Earthquake: A Decoupling Horizon in the Northern Zagros Mountains Inferred from InSAR Observations
    Vajedian, Sanaz
    Motagh, Mahdi
    Mousavi, Zahra
    Motaghi, Khalil
    Fielding, Eric. J.
    Akbari, Bahman
    Wetzel, Hans-Ulrich
    Darabi, Aliakbar
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (10):
  • [8] Insights on fault reactivation during the 2019 November 11, Mw 4.9 Le Teil earthquake in southeastern France, from a joint 3-D geological model and InSAR time-series analysis
    Marconato, L.
    Leloup, P. H.
    Lasserre, C.
    Jolivet, R.
    Caritg, S.
    Grandin, R.
    Metois, M.
    Cavalie, O.
    Audin, L.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 229 (02) : 758 - 775
  • [9] Co-seismic deformation and related hazards associated with the 2022 Mw 5.6 Cianjur earthquake in West Java']Java, Indonesia: insights from combined seismological analysis, DInSAR, and geomorphological investigations
    Hadmoko, Danang Sri
    Wibowo, Sandy Budi
    Sianipar, Dimas Salomo J.
    Daryono, Daryono
    Fathoni, Mohammad Naufal
    Pratiwi, Rohanita Setia
    Haryono, Eko
    Lavigne, Franck
    [J]. GEOENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS, 2024, 11 (01)