Codifiability, relationship-specific information technology investment, and optimal contracting

被引:27
|
作者
Levi, M [1 ]
Kleindorfer, PR
Wu, DJ
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, DuPree Coll Management, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
B2B exchanges; codifiability; electronic marketplaces; relationship-specific investments; supplier management;
D O I
10.1080/07421222.2003.11045762
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The past few years have seen an explosion in the number of e-marketplaces, including a variety of electronic exchanges in the B2B arena, but many of these have also collapsed (e.g., ChemdexNentro). The question addressed in this paper is what are the underlying factors that affect which transactions are likely to be supportable by B2B exchanges. In particular, we identify and study three factors: supplier management, idiosyncratic investments in information systems, and codifiability (i.e., digitalizability) of product and order-fulfillment specifications underlying transactions. We show that transaction codifiability plays a fundamental role in influencing the nature of sustainable contracting and IT investments in e-markets. Hypotheses are derived from an analytical model of codifiability in e-marketplaces; these hypotheses are supported by several case studies by the authors and others on the key success factors underlying B2B exchanges.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 98
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Board Composition and Relationship-Specific Investments by Customers and Suppliers
    Minnick, Kristina
    Raman, Kartik
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 46 (01) : 203 - 239
  • [42] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION AND JOB SATISFACTION IN CONTRACTING COMPANIES IN JORDAN
    Attar, Ghalia A.
    Sweis, Rateb J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 15 : 44 - 63
  • [43] Productivity, relationship-specific inputs and the sourcing modes of multinationals
    Defever, Fabrice
    Toubal, Farid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2013, 94 : 345 - 357
  • [44] Standard values and relationship-specific validity of the Bielefeld Relationship Expectations Questionnaire (BFPE)
    Petrowski, Katja
    Berth, Hendrik
    Paul, Soeren
    Grande, Gesine
    Stoebel-Richter, Yve
    Braehler, Elmar
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10
  • [45] The varying impact of buyer and supplier expected relationship-specific investments on relationship governance
    Khan, Imran
    Eilert, Meike
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2021, 36 (06) : 905 - 916
  • [46] Standard values and relationship-specific validity of the Bielefeld Relationship Expectations Questionnaire (BFPE)
    Katja Petrowski
    Hendrik Berth
    Sören Paul
    Gesine Grande
    Yve Stöbel-Richter
    Elmar Brähler
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10
  • [47] Regulating the risks of closeness - A relationship-specific sense of felt security
    Murray, SL
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (02) : 74 - 78
  • [48] Overinvestment in partially relationship-specific assets and R&D
    Deltas, George
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2006, 46 (03): : 466 - 475
  • [49] Relationship-specific Encoding of Social Touch in Somatosensory and Insular Cortices
    Suvilehto, Juulia T.
    Renvall, Ville
    Nummenmaa, Lauri
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 464 : 105 - 116
  • [50] Developing relationship-specific memory and absorptive capacity in interorganizational relationships
    Choi, Sujeong
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 15 (04): : 223 - 238