Cardiogenic shock and machine learning: A systematic review on prediction through clinical decision support softwares

被引:7
|
作者
Aleman, Rene [1 ]
Patel, Sinal [1 ]
Sleiman, Jose [2 ]
Navia, Jose [1 ]
Sheffield, Cedric [1 ]
Brozzi, Nicolas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Heart Vasc & Thorac Inst, Weston, FL USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Cardiol, Weston, FL USA
关键词
area under the curve; cardiogenic shock; early detection; machine learning; receiving operating characteristics; systematic review; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; HEART-FAILURE; EARLY REVASCULARIZATION; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; RISK; OUTCOMES; CLASSIFICATION; SCORE; ERA;
D O I
10.1111/jocs.15934
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Cardiogenic shock (CS) withholds a significantly high mortality rate between 40% and 60% despite advances in diagnosis and medical/surgical intervention. To date, machine learning (ML) is being implemented to integrate numerous data to optimize early diagnostic predictions and suggest clinical courses. This systematic review summarizes the area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) accuracy for the early prediction of CS. Methods: A systematic review was conducted within databases of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Clinical Key/MEDLINE, Embase, GoogleScholar, and Cochrane. Cohort studies that assessed the accuracy of early detection of CS using ML software were included. Data extraction was focused on AUC-ROC values directed towards the early detection of CS. Results: A total of 943 studies were included for systematic review. From the reviewed studies, 2.2% (N = 21) evaluated patient outcomes, of which 14.3% (N = 3) were assessed. The collective patient cohort (N = 698) consisted of 314 (45.0%) females, with an average age and body mass index of 64.1 years and 28.1 kg/m(2), respectively. Collectively, 159 (22.8%) mortalities were reported following early CS detection. Altogether, the AUC-ROC value was 0.82 (alpha = .05), deeming it of superb sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: From the present comprehensively gathered data, this study accounts the use of ML software for the early detection of CS in a clinical setting as a valid tool to predict patients at risk of CS. The complexity of ML and its parallel lack of clinical evidence implies that further prospective randomized control trials are needed to draw definitive conclusions before standardizing the use of these technologies. Brief Summary: The catastrophic risk of developing CS continues to be a concern in the management of critical cardiac care. The use of ML predictive models have the potential to provide the accurate and necessary feedback for the early detection and proper management of CS. This systematic review summarizes the AUC-ROCs accuracy for the early prediction of CS.
引用
收藏
页码:4153 / 4159
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adoption of Clinical Decision Support in Multimorbidity: A Systematic Review
    Fraccaro, Paolo
    Casteleiro, Mercedes Arguello
    Ainsworth, John
    Buchan, Iain
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 3 (01)
  • [42] Mobile Clinical Decision Support Systems - A Systematic Review
    Dwivedi, Rahul
    Ghahramani, Fereshteh
    Mahapatra, RadhaKanta
    [J]. AMCIS 2017 PROCEEDINGS, 2017,
  • [43] Prediction of oil and gas pipeline failures through machine learning approaches: A systematic review
    Al-Sabaeei, Abdulnaser M.
    Alhussian, Hitham
    Abdulkadir, Said Jadid
    Jagadeesh, Ajayshankar
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 10 : 1313 - 1338
  • [44] Machine Learning in the Prediction of Trauma Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Zhang, Timothy
    Nikouline, Anton
    Lightfoot, David
    Nolan, Brodie
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (05) : 440 - 455
  • [45] Machine Learning and Prediction of Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review
    Santangelo, Omar Enzo
    Gentile, Vito
    Pizzo, Stefano
    Giordano, Domiziana
    Cedrone, Fabrizio
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE EXTRACTION, 2023, 5 (01): : 175 - 198
  • [46] Machine Learning and Surgical Outcomes Prediction: A Systematic Review
    Elfanagely, Omar
    Toyoda, Yoshilzo
    Othman, Sammy
    Mellia, Joseph A.
    Basta, Marten
    Liu, Tony
    Kording, Konrad
    Ungar, Lyle
    Fischer, John P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 264 : 346 - 361
  • [47] Machine Learning and Neurosurgical Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review
    Senders, Joeky T.
    Staples, Patrick C.
    Karhade, Aditya V.
    Zaki, Mark M.
    Gormley, William B.
    Broekman, Marike L. D.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Arnaout, Omar
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 109 : 476 - +
  • [48] Machine learning as a clinical decision support tool for patients with acromegaly
    Sulu, Cem
    Bektas, Ayyuce Begum
    Sahin, Serdar
    Durcan, Emre
    Kara, Zehra
    Demir, Ahmet Numan
    Ozkaya, Hande Mefkure
    Tanriover, Necmettin
    Comunoglu, Nil
    Kizilkilic, Osman
    Gazioglu, Nurperi
    Gonen, Mehmet
    Kadioglu, Pinar
    [J]. PITUITARY, 2022, 25 (03) : 486 - 495
  • [49] Machine learning as a clinical decision support tool for patients with acromegaly
    Cem Sulu
    Ayyüce Begüm Bektaş
    Serdar Şahin
    Emre Durcan
    Zehra Kara
    Ahmet Numan Demir
    Hande Mefkure Özkaya
    Necmettin Tanrıöver
    Nil Çomunoğlu
    Osman Kızılkılıç
    Nurperi Gazioğlu
    Mehmet Gönen
    Pınar Kadıoğlu
    [J]. Pituitary, 2022, 25 : 486 - 495
  • [50] Machine Learning Based Clinical Decision Support and Clinician Trust
    Schwartz, Jessica
    Cato, Kenrick
    [J]. 2020 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS (ICHI 2020), 2020, : 571 - 571