Cardiogenic shock and machine learning: A systematic review on prediction through clinical decision support softwares

被引:7
|
作者
Aleman, Rene [1 ]
Patel, Sinal [1 ]
Sleiman, Jose [2 ]
Navia, Jose [1 ]
Sheffield, Cedric [1 ]
Brozzi, Nicolas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Heart Vasc & Thorac Inst, Weston, FL USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Cardiol, Weston, FL USA
关键词
area under the curve; cardiogenic shock; early detection; machine learning; receiving operating characteristics; systematic review; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; HEART-FAILURE; EARLY REVASCULARIZATION; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; RISK; OUTCOMES; CLASSIFICATION; SCORE; ERA;
D O I
10.1111/jocs.15934
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Cardiogenic shock (CS) withholds a significantly high mortality rate between 40% and 60% despite advances in diagnosis and medical/surgical intervention. To date, machine learning (ML) is being implemented to integrate numerous data to optimize early diagnostic predictions and suggest clinical courses. This systematic review summarizes the area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) accuracy for the early prediction of CS. Methods: A systematic review was conducted within databases of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Clinical Key/MEDLINE, Embase, GoogleScholar, and Cochrane. Cohort studies that assessed the accuracy of early detection of CS using ML software were included. Data extraction was focused on AUC-ROC values directed towards the early detection of CS. Results: A total of 943 studies were included for systematic review. From the reviewed studies, 2.2% (N = 21) evaluated patient outcomes, of which 14.3% (N = 3) were assessed. The collective patient cohort (N = 698) consisted of 314 (45.0%) females, with an average age and body mass index of 64.1 years and 28.1 kg/m(2), respectively. Collectively, 159 (22.8%) mortalities were reported following early CS detection. Altogether, the AUC-ROC value was 0.82 (alpha = .05), deeming it of superb sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: From the present comprehensively gathered data, this study accounts the use of ML software for the early detection of CS in a clinical setting as a valid tool to predict patients at risk of CS. The complexity of ML and its parallel lack of clinical evidence implies that further prospective randomized control trials are needed to draw definitive conclusions before standardizing the use of these technologies. Brief Summary: The catastrophic risk of developing CS continues to be a concern in the management of critical cardiac care. The use of ML predictive models have the potential to provide the accurate and necessary feedback for the early detection and proper management of CS. This systematic review summarizes the AUC-ROCs accuracy for the early prediction of CS.
引用
收藏
页码:4153 / 4159
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MACHINE LEARNING FOR EARLY PREDICTION OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Chang, Yale
    Antonescu, Corneliu
    Ravindranath, Shreyas Raj
    Dong, Junzi
    Lu, MingYu
    Vicario, Francesco
    Wondrely, Lisa
    Thompson, Pam
    Swearingen, Dennis
    Acharya, Deepak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 278 - 278
  • [2] Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
    Rong, Fangning
    Xiang, Huaqiang
    Qian, Lu
    Xue, Yangjing
    Ji, Kangting
    Yin, Ripen
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [3] Neonatal sepsis prediction through clinical decision support algorithms: A systematic review
    Persad, Emma
    Jost, Kerstin
    Honore, Antoine
    Forsberg, David
    Coste, Karen
    Olsson, Hanna
    Rautiainen, Susanne
    Herlenius, Eric
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2021, 110 (12) : 3201 - 3226
  • [4] Machine learning for diabetes clinical decision support: a review
    Ashwini Tuppad
    Shantala Devi Patil
    [J]. Advances in Computational Intelligence, 2022, 2 (2):
  • [5] Early Prediction of Cardiogenic Shock Using Machine Learning
    Chang, Yale
    Antonescu, Corneliu
    Ravindranath, Shreyas
    Dong, Junzi
    Lu, Mingyu
    Vicario, Francesco
    Wondrely, Lisa
    Thompson, Pam
    Swearingen, Dennis
    Acharya, Deepak
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [6] CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (CDSS) FOR HEART DISEASE DIAGNOSIS AND PREDICTION BY MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Ullah, Inam
    Inayat, Tariq
    Ullah, Naeem
    Alzahrani, Faris
    Khan, Muhammad Ijaz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (10)
  • [7] TCCC Decision Support With Machine Learning Prediction of Hemorrhage Risk, Shock Probability
    Nemeth, Christopher
    Amos-Binks, Adam
    Rule, Gregory
    Laufersweiler, Dawn
    Keeney, Natalie
    Flint, Isaac
    Pinevich, Yuliya
    Herasevich, Vitaly
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 2023, 188 : 659 - 665
  • [8] Machine learning applications to clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence augmented systematic review
    Buchlak, Quinlan D.
    Esmaili, Nazanin
    Leveque, Jean-Christophe
    Farrokhi, Farrokh
    Bennett, Christine
    Piccardi, Massimo
    Sethi, Rajiv K.
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2020, 43 (05) : 1235 - 1253
  • [9] Machine learning applications to clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence augmented systematic review
    Quinlan D. Buchlak
    Nazanin Esmaili
    Jean-Christophe Leveque
    Farrokh Farrokhi
    Christine Bennett
    Massimo Piccardi
    Rajiv K. Sethi
    [J]. Neurosurgical Review, 2020, 43 : 1235 - 1253
  • [10] Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems for pregnancy care: A systematic review
    Du, Yuhan
    McNestry, Catherine
    Wei, Lan
    Antoniadi, Anna Markella
    McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
    Mooney, Catherine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 173