Diminutives facilitate word segmentation in natural speech: Cross-linguistic evidence

被引:11
|
作者
Kempe, Vera [1 ]
Brooks, Patrim J.
Gillis, Steven
Samson, Graham
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Dept Psychol, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[2] CUNY, Coll Staten Isl, Staten Isl, NY USA
[3] CUNY, Grad Ctr, Staten Isl, NY USA
[4] Univ Antwerp, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[5] Univ Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03193313
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Final-syllable invariance is characteristic of diminutives (e.g., doggie), which are a pervasive feature of the child-directed speech registers of many languages. Invariance in word endings has been shown to facilitate word segmentation (Kempe, Brooks, & Gillis, 2005) in an incidental-leaming paradigm in which synthesized Dutch pseudonouns were used. To broaden the cross-linguistic evidence for this invariance effect and to increase its ecological validity, adult English speakers (n = 276) were exposed to naturally spoken Dutch or Russian pseudonouns presented in sentence contexts. A forced choice test was given to assess target recognition, with foils comprising unfamiliar syllable combinations in Experiments I and 2 and syllable combinations straddling word boundaries in Experiment 3. A control group (n = 2 10) received the recognition test with no prior exposure to targets. Recognition performance improved with increasing final-syllable rhyme invariance, with larger increases for the experimental group. This confirms that word ending invariance is a valid segmentation cue in artificial, as well as naturalistic, speech and that diminutives may aid segmentation in a number of languages.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / 773
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PRAGMATICS IN APHASIA - CROSS-LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE
    WULFECK, B
    BATES, E
    JUAREZ, L
    OPIE, M
    FRIEDERICI, A
    MACWHINNEY, B
    ZURIF, E
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1989, 32 : 315 - 336
  • [22] CROSS-LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE FOR NUMBER PHRASE
    RITTER, E
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE LINGUISTIQUE, 1992, 37 (02): : 197 - 218
  • [23] A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition
    Durgunoglu, AY
    Öney, B
    [J]. READING AND WRITING, 1999, 11 (04) : 281 - 299
  • [24] A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition
    Aydı Yücesan Durgunoğlu
    Banu Öney
    [J]. Reading and Writing, 1999, 11 : 281 - 299
  • [25] Correlation versus prediction in children's word learning: Cross-linguistic evidence and simulations
    Colunga, Eliana
    Smith, Linda B.
    Gasser, Michael
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2009, 1 (02) : 197 - 217
  • [26] A Cross-Linguistic Speech Error Investigation of Functional Complexity
    Sheri Wells-Jensen
    [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2007, 36 : 107 - 157
  • [27] A cross-linguistic speech error investigation of functional complexity
    Wells-Jensen, Sheri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2007, 36 (02) : 107 - 157
  • [28] Acoustic cues to grammatical structure in infant-directed speech: Cross-linguistic evidence
    Fisher, C
    Tokura, H
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 67 (06) : 3192 - 3218
  • [29] Diminutives in child-directed speech supplement metric with distributional word segmentation cues
    Vera Kempe
    Patricia J. Brooks
    Steven Gillis
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2005, 12 : 145 - 151
  • [30] Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Prosodic Features for Sentence Segmentation
    Fung, James G.
    Hakkani-Tur, Dilek
    Doss, Mathew Magimai
    Shriberg, Liz
    Cuendet, Sebastien
    Mirghqfori, Nikki
    [J]. INTERSPEECH 2007: 8TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 2828 - 2831