Visual Assessment of Perfusion-Diffusion Mismatch Is Inadequate to Select Patients for Thrombolysis

被引:56
|
作者
Campbell, Bruce C. V. [1 ,2 ]
Christensen, Soren [2 ]
Foster, Sarah J. [2 ]
Desmond, Patricia M. [2 ]
Parsons, Mark W. [4 ,5 ]
Butcher, Kenneth S. [7 ]
Barber, P. Alan [8 ]
Levi, Christopher R. [4 ,5 ]
Bladin, Christopher F. [6 ]
Donnan, Geoffrey A. [3 ]
Davis, Stephen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Med & Neurol, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Radiol, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Florey Neurosci Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Newcastle, Dept Neurol, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[5] Univ Newcastle, Hunter Med Res Inst, John Hunter Hosp, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Neurol, Box Hill Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[7] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[8] Univ Auckland, Ctr Brain Res, Auckland 1, New Zealand
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Stroke; Tissue plasminogen activator; Ischemic penumbra; STROKE;
D O I
10.1159/000311080
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: For MR perfusion-diffusion mismatch to be clinically useful as a means of selecting patients for thrombolysis, it needs to occur in real time at the MRI console. Visual mismatch assessment has been used clinically and in trials but has not been systematically validated. We compared the accuracy of visually rating console-generated images with offline volumetric measurements using data from the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET). Methods: Perfusion time-to-peak (TTP) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) (as generated by commercial MRI console software) and T-max perfusion maps (which required offline calculation) were visually rated. Perfusion-diffusion mismatch, defined as a ratio of perfusion: diffusion lesion volume of >1.2, was independently scored by 1 expert and 2 inexperienced raters blinded to calculated volumes and clinical information. Visual mismatch was compared with region-of-interest-based volumetric calculation, which was used as the gold standard. Results: Volumetric calculation demonstrated perfusion-diffusion mismatch in 85/99 patients. Visual TTP-DWI mismatch was correctly classified by the experienced rater in 82% of the cases (sensitivity: 0.86; specificity: 0.54) compared to 73% for the inexperienced raters (sensitivity: 0.75; specificity: 0.57). The interrater reliability for TTP-DWI mismatch was moderate (kappa = 0.50). Visual T-max-DWI mismatch performed better (agreement -93 and 87%, sensitivity -95 and 88%, specificity -77 and 82% for the experienced and inexperienced raters, respectively). Conclusions: The assessment of visual TTP-DWI mismatch at the MRI console is insufficiently reliable for use in clinical trials. Differences in perfusion analysis technique and visual inaccuracies combine to make visual TTP-DWI mismatch substantially different to volumetric T-max-DWI mismatch. Automated software that applies perfusion thresholds may improve the reproducibility of real-time mismatch assessment. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 596
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rapid assessment of perfusion-diffusion mismatch
    Butcher, Ken
    Parsons, Mark
    Allport, Louise
    Lee, Sang Bong
    Barber, P. Alan
    Tress, Brian
    Donnan, Geoffrey A.
    Davis, Stephen M.
    [J]. STROKE, 2008, 39 (01) : 75 - 81
  • [2] Visual Perfusion-Diffusion Mismatch Is Equivalent to Quantitative Mismatch
    Luby, Marie
    Ku, Katherine D.
    Latour, Lawrence L.
    Merino, Jose G.
    Hsia, Amie W.
    Lynch, John K.
    Warach, Steven
    [J]. STROKE, 2011, 42 (04) : 1010 - 1014
  • [3] Etiology of perfusion-diffusion mismatch
    Restrepo, L
    Jacobs, MA
    Barker, PB
    Beauchamp, NJ
    Wityk, RJ
    [J]. STROKE, 2003, 34 (01) : 261 - 261
  • [4] Standardizing quantitative and qualitative perfusion-diffusion mismatch assessment
    Butcher, Ken
    Parsons, Mark
    Allport, Louise
    Lee, Sang Bong
    Barber, Peter A.
    Tress, Brian
    Donnan, Geoff
    Davis, Stephen
    [J]. STROKE, 2007, 38 (02) : 497 - 497
  • [5] Refining the perfusion-diffusion mismatch hypothesis
    Butcher, KS
    Parsons, M
    MacGregor, L
    Barber, PA
    Chalk, J
    Bladin, C
    Levi, C
    Kimber, T
    Schultz, D
    Fink, J
    Tress, B
    Donnan, G
    Davis, S
    [J]. STROKE, 2005, 36 (06) : 1153 - 1159
  • [6] Perfusion-diffusion Mismatch Predicts Early Neurological Deterioration in Anterior Circulation Infarction without Thrombolysis
    Hsu, Chia-Yu
    Cheng, Chun-Yu
    Tsai, Yuan-Hsiung
    Lee, Jiann-Der
    Yang, Jen-Tsung
    Weng, Hsu-Huei
    Lin, Leng-Chieh
    Huang, Ying-Chih
    Lee, Meng
    Lee, Ming-Hsueh
    Wu, Chih-Ying
    Lin, Ya-Hui
    Hsu, Huan-Lin
    Yang, Hsin-Ta
    Pan, Yi-Ting
    Huang, Yen-Chu
    [J]. CURRENT NEUROVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2015, 12 (03) : 277 - 282
  • [7] Clinical applicability and the perfusion-diffusion mismatch theory
    Harrer, Judith U.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2010, 75 (12) : 1034 - 1035
  • [8] Clinical-CT mismatch does not identify patients with MRI perfusion-diffusion mismatch
    Messe, S
    Chalela, J
    Kasner, SE
    Demchuk, A
    Hill, M
    Cucchiara, BL
    Warach, S
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2006, 66 (05) : A108 - A108
  • [9] Significance of the perfusion-diffusion mismatch in chronic cerebral ischemia
    Surikova, Irina
    Meisel, Stefanie
    Siebler, Mario
    Wittsack, Hans-Jorg
    Seitz, Rudiger J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 24 (04) : 771 - 778
  • [10] The frequency of perfusion-diffusion mismatch decreases with objective definition
    Butcher, KS
    Parsons, M
    Barber, A
    Newcastle, HH
    Levi, C
    Chalk, J
    Read, S
    Schultz, D
    Bladin, C
    Desmond, P
    Tress, B
    Donnan, G
    Davis, S
    [J]. STROKE, 2004, 35 (01) : 259 - 259