Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults at Primary Care Visits: VITAL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:60
|
作者
Lubitz, Steven A. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Atlas, Steven J. [3 ]
Ashburner, Jeffrey M. [3 ,5 ]
Lipsanopoulos, Ana T. Trisini [4 ]
Borowsky, Leila H. [3 ]
Guan, Wyliena [6 ]
Khurshid, Shaan [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Ellinor, Patrick T. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Chang, Yuchiao [3 ,5 ]
McManus, David D. [7 ]
Singer, Daniel E. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, 55 Fruit St,GRB 109, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Demoulas Ctr Cardiac Arrhythmias, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[7] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Med, Worcester, MA USA
关键词
atrial fibrillation; digital health; electrocardiography; screening; ORAL ANTICOAGULATION; RISK-FACTOR; STROKE; THROMBOEMBOLISM; RATIONALE; DIAGNOSIS; DESIGN; DEVICE; ECG;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) may cause preventable strokes. Guidelines differ regarding AF screening recommendations. We tested whether point-of-care screening with a handheld single-lead ECG at primary care practice visits increases diagnoses of AF. METHODS: We randomized 16 primary care clinics 1:1 to AF screening using a handheld single-lead ECG (AliveCor KardiaMobile) during vital sign assessments, or usual care. Patients included were ages >= 65 years. Screening results were provided to primary care clinicians at the encounter. All confirmatory diagnostic testing and treatment decisions were made by the primary care clinician. New AF diagnoses during the 1-year follow-up were ascertained electronically and manually adjudicated. Proportions and incidence rates were calculated. Effect heterogeneity was assessed. RESULTS: Of 30 715 patients without prevalent AF (n=15 393 screening [91% screened], n=15 322 control), 1.72% of individuals in the screening group had new AF diagnosed at 1 year versus 1.59% in the control group (risk difference, 0.13% [95% CI, -0.16 to 0.42]; P=0.38). In prespecified subgroup analyses, new AF diagnoses in the screening and control groups were greater among those aged >= 85 years (5.56% versus 3.76%, respectively; risk difference, 1.80% [95% CI, 0.18 to 3.30]). The difference in newly diagnosed AF between the screening period and the previous year was marginally greater in the screening versus control group (0.32% versus -0.12%; risk difference, 0.43% [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.84]). The proportion of individuals with newly diagnosed AF who were initiated on oral anticoagulants was not different in the screening (n=194, 73.5%) and control (n=172, 70.8%) arms (risk difference, 2.7% [95% CI, -5.5 to 10.4]). CONCLUSIONS: Screening for AF using a single-lead ECG at primary care visits did not affect new AF diagnoses among all individuals aged 65 years or older compared with usual care.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 954
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Opportunistic screening versus usual care for detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial
    Uittenbogaart, Steven B.
    Verbiest-van Gurp, Nicole
    Lucassen, Wim A. M.
    Winkens, Bjorn
    Nielen, Mark
    Erkens, Petra M. G.
    Knottnerus, J. Andre
    van Weert, Henk C. P. M.
    Stoffers, Henri E. J. H.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 370
  • [22] Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Asymptomatic Older Adults
    不详
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 387 (06): : 565 - 567
  • [23] Screening for atrial fibrillation in primary care
    Wheeldon, NM
    Tayler, DI
    Anagnostou, E
    Cook, D
    Wales, C
    Oakley, GDG
    HEART, 1998, 79 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [24] Patients' views about screening for atrial fibrillation (AF): a qualitative study in primary care
    Lown, Mark
    Wilcox, Christopher R.
    Hughes, Stephanie
    Santer, Miriam
    Lewith, George
    Moore, Michael
    Little, Paul
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [25] EFFECT OF A "CONTRACEPTIVE VITAL SIGN" IN PRIMARY CARE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Schwarz, E. B.
    Parisi, S.
    Fischer, G.
    Handler, S.
    Hess, R.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (02) : 214 - 215
  • [26] Chronic care clinics: A randomized controlled trial of a new model of primary care for frail older adults
    Coleman, EA
    Grothaus, LC
    Sandhu, N
    Wagner, EH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1999, 47 (07) : 775 - 783
  • [27] Quarterly versus annual ECG screening for atrial fibrillation in older Chinese (AF-CATCH): a prospective, randomised, controlled trial
    Zhang, W.
    Chen, Y.
    Wang, J. G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 452 - 452
  • [28] Quarterly versus Annual ECG Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Chinese (AF-CATCH): A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Trial
    Zhang, Wei
    Chen, Yi
    Wang, Jiguang
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [29] Accuracy, Usability, and Adherence of Smartwatches for Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Older Adults After Stroke: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ding, Eric Y.
    Tran, Khanh-Van
    Lessard, Darleen
    Wang, Ziyue
    Han, Dong
    Mohagheghian, Fahimeh
    Otabil, Edith Mensah
    Noorishirazi, Kamran
    Mehawej, Jordy
    Filippaios, Andreas
    Naeem, Syed
    Gottbrecht, Matthew F.
    Fitzgibbons, Timothy P.
    Saczynski, S.
    Barton, Bruce
    Chon, Ki
    Mcmanus, David D.
    JMIR CARDIO, 2023, 7
  • [30] Increasing older adults' walking through primary care: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Mutrie, Nanette
    Doolin, Orla
    Fitzsimons, Claire F.
    Grant, P. Margaret
    Granat, Malcolm
    Grealy, Madeleine
    Macdonald, Hazel
    MacMillan, Freya
    McConnachie, Alex
    Rowe, David A.
    Shaw, Rebecca
    Skelton, Dawn A.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2012, 29 (06) : 633 - 642