The bacterial microbiota in the ceca of Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) differs between wild and captive birds

被引:101
|
作者
Wienemann, Tobias [1 ]
Schmitt-Wagner, Dirk [2 ]
Meuser, Katja [1 ]
Segelbacher, Gernot [3 ]
Schink, Bernhard [4 ]
Brune, Andreas [1 ]
Berthold, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Terr Microbiol, Dept Biogeochem, D-35043 Marburg, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Ornithol, D-78315 Radolfzell am Bodensee, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Management, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Konstanz, Fachbereich Biol, D-78457 Constance, Germany
关键词
Birds; Cecum; Gut microbiota; Bacterial community; Diet; Detoxification; DETOXIFY PYRROLIZIDINE ALKALOIDS; LENGTH-POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; LAGOPUS-LAGOPUS-LAGOPUS; VOLATILE FATTY-ACIDS; RIBOSOMAL-RNA GENES; MEGASPHAERA-ELSDENII; SP-NOV; SYNERGISTES-JONESII; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; WILLOW PTARMIGAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.syapm.2011.06.003
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The diet of wild capercaillie differs strongly between seasons. Particularly during winter, when energy demands are high and the birds forage solely on coniferous needles, microbial fermentations in the ceca are considered to contribute significantly to the energy requirement and to the detoxification of the resinous diet. Here, we present the first cultivation-independent analysis of the bacterial community in the cecum of capercaillie, using the 16S rRNA gene as a molecular marker. Cloning and fingerprinting analyses of cecum feces show distinct differences between wild and captive birds. While certain lineages of Clostridiales, Synergistetes, and Actinobacteria are most prevalent in wild birds, they are strongly reduced in individuals raised in captivity. Most striking is the complete absence of Megasphaera and Synergistes species in captive capercaillie, which are characterized by a large abundance of Gammaproteobacteria closely related to members of the genus Annerobiospirillum, bacteria that are commonly connected with intestinal dysfunction. The community profiles of cecum content from wild birds differed between summer and winter season, and the cecum wall may be an important site for bacterial colonization. Our results corroborate the hypothesis that the bacterial community in the ceca of tetraonid birds changes in response to their highly specialized seasonal diets. Moreover, we propose that the observed differences in community profiles between wild and captive capercaillie reflects a disturbance in the bacterial microbiota that compromises the performance of the cecum and may be responsible for the high mortality of captive birds released into nature. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 551
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] The gut bacterial microbiota of sea turtles differs between geographically distinct populations
    Scheelings, T. Franciscus
    Moore, Robert J.
    Van, Thi Thu Hao
    Klaassen, Marcel
    Reina, Richard D.
    ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH, 2020, 42 : 95 - 108
  • [22] Comparison of gut microbiota diversity between wild and captive bharals (Pseudois nayaur)
    Xiangwen Chi
    Hongmei Gao
    Guosheng Wu
    Wen Qin
    Pengfei Song
    Lei Wang
    Jiarui Chen
    Zhenyuan Cai
    Tongzuo Zhang
    BMC Veterinary Research, 15
  • [23] Comparison of gut microbiota diversity between wild and captive bharals (Pseudois nayaur)
    Chi, Xiangwen
    Gao, Hongmei
    Wu, Guosheng
    Qin, Wen
    Song, Pengfei
    Wang, Lei
    Chen, Jiarui
    Cai, Zhenyuan
    Zhang, Tongzuo
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (1)
  • [24] Comparison Between the Fecal Bacterial Microbiota of Healthy and Diarrheic Captive Musk Deer
    Li, Yimeng
    Hu, Xiaolong
    Yang, Shuang
    Zhou, Juntong
    Qi, Lei
    Sun, Xiaoning
    Fan, Mengyuan
    Xu, Shanghua
    Cha, Muha
    Zhang, Meishan
    Lin, Shaobi
    Liu, Shuqiang
    Hu, Defu
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [25] Comparison of Gut Microbiota Diversity Between Captive and Wild Tokay Gecko (Gekko gecko)
    Tang, Sanqi
    Li, Yuhui
    Huang, Chengming
    Yan, Shufa
    Li, Yongtai
    Chen, Zening
    Wu, Zhengjun
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [26] Comparative Analysis of the Gut Microbiota Composition between Captive and Wild Forest Musk Deer
    Li, Yimeng
    Hu, Xiaolong
    Yang, Shuang
    Zhou, Juntong
    Zhang, Tianxiang
    Qi, Lei
    Sun, Xiaoning
    Fan, Mengyuan
    Xu, Shanghua
    Cha, Muha
    Zhang, Meishan
    Lin, Shaobi
    Liu, Shuqiang
    Hu, Defu
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [27] Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota between Wild and Captive Golden Snub-Nosed Monkeys
    Wang, Yunting
    Yang, Xuanyi
    Zhang, Mingyi
    Pan, Huijuan
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [28] The comparison of gut microbiota between wild and captive Asian badgers (Meles leucurus) under different seasons
    Pei, Jianchi
    Guan, Yu
    Xiao, Wenhong
    Ge, Jianping
    Feng, Limin
    Yang, Haitao
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [29] Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota Between Wild and Captive Guizhou Snub-Nosed Monkey (Rhinopithecus brelichi)
    Huang, Xiaolong
    Li, Haibo
    Zhang, Lan
    Zhang, Xu
    Cheng, Shaochuan
    Yan, Yuying
    Yang, Wei
    Meng, Bingshun
    Wang, Zuobo
    Zhao, Juanjuan
    Ran, Jingcheng
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [30] Comparative analysis of oral-gut microbiota between captive and wild long-tailed macaque in Thailand
    Vorthon Sawaswong
    Kesmanee Praianantathavorn
    Prangwalai Chanchaem
    Ariya Khamwut
    Taratorn Kemthong
    Yuzuru Hamada
    Suchinda Malaivijitnond
    Sunchai Payungporn
    Scientific Reports, 11