Optimal Paths for Progressive Aircraft Subsystem Electrification in Early Design

被引:2
|
作者
Bendarkar, Mayank V. [1 ]
Rajaram, Dushhyanth [1 ]
Cai, Yu [1 ]
Mavris, Dimitri N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Daniel Guggenheim Sch Aerosp Engn, Aerosp Syst Design Lab, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2022年 / 59卷 / 01期
关键词
Commercial Aircraft; Hybrid Electric Aircraft; Maximum Takeoff Weight; ECS; Thrust to Weight Ratio; Aircraft Configurations; Aircraft Design Process; Pareto Frontier; Energy Density; Flight Optimization System; ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT; ARCHITECTURES; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.2514/1.C036085
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The push for more-electric aircraft (MEA) has motivated numerous studies to quantify and optimize the impact of subsystem electrification in early design phases. Past studies on multi-objective optimization of MEA show a clear benefit over conventional architectures when no constraints are placed on the number of subsystems electrified at once. In reality, aircraft manufacturers are more likely to progressively electrify subsystems over multiple aircraft generations. While step-by-step electrification may lead to suboptimal MEA architectures when compared with scenarios with no such imposition on the number of subsystems electrified, little or no literature was found to address the optimal paths toward such electrification changes. This study proposes a mathematically defensible method to analyze different directions of technology evolution focusing on aircraft subsystem electrification. It seeks to enable decision makers to understand the performance tradeoffs between different electrification paths under different scenarios, constraints, and uncertainties. Certain trends in Pareto-optimal MEA architectures and progressive subsystem electrification order (optimal paths) under uncertainty are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 232
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Optimal Hybrid Power System design for Rural Electrification
    Yadav, D. K.
    Girimaji, Sai Pranith
    Bhatti, T. S.
    2012 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER, CONTROL AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS (ICPCES 2012), 2012,
  • [12] Optimal input design for autonomous aircraft
    Licitra, G.
    Buerger, A.
    Williams, P.
    Ruiterkamp, R.
    Diehl, M.
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2018, 77 : 15 - 27
  • [13] Optimal design of the aircraft ABS controller
    Ko, HY
    Ha, DJ
    Choi, NY
    CONTROL APPLICATIONS OF OPTIMISATION 2003, 2003, : 219 - 224
  • [14] Design of Flow Simulation Subsystem of Ground Simulation Test for Aircraft Fuel System
    Yuan, Zhaohui
    Cao, Nianxia
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEM AND APPLIED MATERIAL, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 466-467 : 1172 - 1175
  • [15] THE DESIGN OF OPTIMAL ACCESS PATHS FOR RELATIONAL DATABASES
    MOTZKIN, D
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1987, 12 (02) : 203 - 213
  • [16] Techno-economic-environmental evaluation of aircraft propulsion electrification: Surrogate-based multi-mission optimal design approach
    Zhang, Jinning
    Roumeliotis, Ioannis
    Zhang, Xin
    Zolotas, Argyrios
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 175
  • [17] Optimal input design for aircraft parameter estimation
    Jauberthie, Carine
    Bournonville, Francois
    Coton, Patricia
    Rendell, Frank
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 10 (04) : 331 - 337
  • [18] Optimal Design Aircraft Engine Mount Systems
    Jiang Xianghua
    Du Ran
    2014 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, APISAT2014, 2015, 99 : 1297 - 1301
  • [19] Aircraft conceptual design for optimal environmental performance
    Henderson, R. P.
    Martins, J. R. R. A.
    Perez, R. E.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 116 (1175): : 1 - 22
  • [20] Optimal Design and Modeling of a Tilt Wing Aircraft
    Lindqvist, Adrian
    Fresk, Emil
    Nikolakopoulos, George
    2015 23RD MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (MED), 2015, : 701 - 708