Van Fraassen's dissolution of Putnam's model-theoretic argument

被引：2

作者：

Frisch, M ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Philosophy, Evanston, IL 60208 USA

来源：

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE | 1999年 / 66卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1086/392681

中图分类号：

N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;

摘要：

Bas van Fraassen has recently argued for a "dissolution" of Hilary Putnam's well-known model-theoretic argument. In this paper I argue that, as it stands, van Fraassen's reply to Putnam is unsuccessful. Nonetheless, it suggests the form a successful response might take.

引用

页码：158 / 164

页数：7

共 50 条

[21] Some Model-Theoretic Remarks on the Ramsey Sentence, with a Closer Look at Ketland’s Argument
Guido Del Din
[J]. Foundations of Science, 2021, 26 : 881 - 900
[22] Model-Theoretic Argument Thirty Years Later
Czerniawski, Krzysztof
[J]. FILOZOFIA NAUKI, 2010, 18 (03): : 19 - +
[23] The Model-Theoretic Argument against Quantifying over Everything
Einheuser, Iris
[J]. DIALECTICA, 2010, 64 (02) : 237 - 246
[24] The Model-Theoretic Argument and the Search for Common Sense Realism
Putnam, Hilary
[J]. FILOZOFIA NAUKI, 2011, 19 (01): : 7 - +
[25] Van Fraassen's unappreciated realism
McMullin, E
[J]. PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2003, 70 (03) : 455 - 478
[26] How liberating is Van Fraassen's voluntarism?
Pool, M
[J]. DIALOGUE-CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2000, 39 (03) : 475 - 490
[27] Reasoning about non-actual possibilities.: Problems with the Douven-Putnam model-theoretic argument against metaphysical realism
Pérez Otero, M
[J]. CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA, 2002, 34 (102): : 29 - 45
[28] Van Fraassen's critique of inference to the best explanation
Okasha, S
[J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2000, 31A (04): : 691 - 710
[29] Measurement and Metaphysics in van Fraassen’s Scientific Representation
Sergio A. Gallegos
[J]. Axiomathes, 2015, 25 : 117 - 131
[30] The Challenge of Scientific Revolutions: Van Fraassen's and Friedman's Responses
Kindi, Vasso
[J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2011, 25 (04) : 327 - 349

← 1 2 3 4 5 →