Survey research in conservation biology

被引:38
|
作者
Haila, Y [1 ]
Margules, CR [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, DIV WILDLIFE & ECOL, LYNEHAM, ACT 2602, AUSTRALIA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0587.1996.tb01261.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We present systematic arguments for the necessity of field survey in conservation biology. Preservation of biological diversity has become a major challenge in conservation biology, but to comprehend diversity, ecologists have to obtain information on what units the 'diversity' of different parts of the world consists of, where these units are, and how they respond to natural and human-induced environmental change. To reach this end, systematic survey procedures need to be developed that incorporate data collecting, data analysis and conclusions about distributional patterns as well as management recommendations into an iterative process that is corrected as experience accumulates. The appropriate survey design depends on the task and needs to be fixed separately in each case; developing long-term observational systems is no less challenging a task than developing experimental systems in laboratory research, or modeling systems in theoretical research. We conclude the paper with five principles of ecological survey. A common denominator of these principles is the need to make explicit decisions at each step so that errors and insufficiences can be corrected later.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 331
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Trajectory of Dispersal Research in Conservation Biology. Systematic Review
    Driscoll, Don A.
    Banks, Sam C.
    Barton, Philip S.
    Ikin, Karen
    Lentini, Pia
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    Smith, Annabel L.
    Berry, Laurence E.
    Burns, Emma L.
    Edworthy, Amanda
    Evans, Maldwyn J.
    Gibson, Rebecca
    Heinsohn, Rob
    Howland, Brett
    Kay, Geoff
    Munro, Nicola
    Scheele, Ben C.
    Stirnemann, Ingrid
    Stojanovic, Dejan
    Sweaney, Nici
    Villasenor, Nelida R.
    Westgate, Martin J.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [22] Omics approaches for conservation biology research on the bivalve Chamelea gallina
    Federica Carducci
    Maria Assunta Biscotti
    Emiliano Trucchi
    Maria Elisa Giuliani
    Stefania Gorbi
    Alessandro Coluccelli
    Marco Barucca
    Adriana Canapa
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [23] Omics approaches for conservation biology research on the bivalve Chamelea gallina
    Carducci, Federica
    Biscotti, Maria Assunta
    Trucchi, Emiliano
    Giuliani, Maria Elisa
    Gorbi, Stefania
    Coluccelli, Alessandro
    Barucca, Marco
    Canapa, Adriana
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [24] Seahorse Aquaculture, Biology and Conservation: Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities
    Cohen, Felipe P. A.
    Valenti, Wagner C.
    Planas, Miquel
    Calado, Ricardo
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE, 2017, 25 (01) : 100 - 111
  • [25] THE BIOLOGY OF CONSERVATION
    CHERFAS, J
    NEW SCIENTIST, 1985, 107 (1471) : 43 - 45
  • [26] Conservation Biology
    Richard A. Griffths
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 1998, 7 (6) : 839 - 840
  • [27] PRIORITISING RESEARCH IN STEPPE BIRD CONSERVATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY
    Morales, Manuel B.
    Traba, Juan
    ARDEOLA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2016, 63 (01): : 137 - 150
  • [28] Conservation biology of the Bonelli's Eagle in Spain:: research and management.
    Ontiveros, D
    Real, J
    Balbontín, J
    Carrete, MR
    Ferreiro, E
    Ferrer, M
    Mañosa, S
    Pleguezuelos, JM
    Sánchez-Zapata, JA
    ARDEOLA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2004, 51 (02): : 461 - 470
  • [29] Graduate students in conservation biology: Bridging the research-implementation gap
    Courter, Jason R.
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2012, 20 (01) : 62 - 64
  • [30] Introduction to Northeast Pacific Shark Biology, Research, and Conservation, Part B
    Larson, Shawn E.
    Lowry, Dayv
    NORTHEAST PACIFIC SHARK BIOLOGY, RESEARCH, AND CONSERVATION, PT B, 2017, 78 : 1 - 8