Assessment on the vulnerability of Korean aquaculture to climate change

被引:20
|
作者
Kim, Bong-Tae [1 ]
Brown, Christopher L. [2 ]
Kim, Do-Hoon [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Maritime Inst, Fisheries Policy Res Div, 26 Haeyang Ro 301Beon Gil, Busan 49111, South Korea
[2] World Fisheries Univ, 45 Yongso Ro, Busan 48513, South Korea
[3] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Marine & Fisheries Business & Econ, 45 Yongso Ro, Busan 48513, South Korea
关键词
Aquaculture; Climate change; Vulnerability; Sensitivity; Adaptive capacity; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We assess the vulnerability to climate change of Korean aquaculture based on predicted changes in seawater temperature and salinity in adjacent sea areas of the Korean Peninsula according to representative concentration pathways (RCP) scenarios. Unlike previous studies that have been conducted mostly on a national scale, we classify 14 farming species in major production regions of the Republic of Korea, and assess their vulnerability for each region, using the indicator-based method and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's definition of vulnerability in order to overcome limitations in developing specific adaptation strategies within a country. First, for each exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, specific and proper indicators are selected. Subsequently, these indicators are estimated and weighted to analyze vulnerability to climate change. The results show that the absolute level of vulnerability is high in a long-term period of RCP8.5 in which exposure becomes severe, whereas the relative vulnerability is similar among farming species and regions. Specifically, vulnerability is at the highest level in seaweed, such as laver and sea mustard, while fish, shrimp, and abalone are relatively less vulnerable to climate change.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 122
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vulnerability assessment of Korean fisheries to climate change
    Kim, Moo-Jin
    Hong, Jae-Beum
    Han, In-Seong
    Lee, Joon-Soo
    Kim, Do-Hoon
    MARINE POLICY, 2023, 155
  • [2] A global assessment of the vulnerability of shellfish aquaculture to climate change and ocean acidification
    Stewart-Sinclair, Phoebe J.
    Last, Kim S.
    Payne, Ben L.
    Wilding, Thomas A.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 10 (07): : 3518 - 3534
  • [3] Development of the Korean Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Tool (VESTAP)-Centered on Health Vulnerability to Heat Waves
    Oh, Kwan-Young
    Lee, Moung-Jin
    Jeon, Seong-Woo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (07)
  • [4] Climate change vulnerability assessment in Georgia
    Binita, K. C.
    Shepherd, J. Marshall
    Gaither, Cassandra Johnson
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 62 : 62 - 74
  • [5] Climate change vulnerability assessment of species
    Foden, Wendy B.
    Young, Bruce E.
    Akcakaya, H. Resit
    Garcia, Raquel A.
    Hoffmann, Ary A.
    Stein, Bruce A.
    Thomas, Chris D.
    Wheatley, Christopher J.
    Bickford, David
    Carr, Jamie A.
    Hole, David G.
    Martin, Tara G.
    Pacifici, Michela
    Pearce-Higgins, James W.
    Platts, Philip J.
    Visconti, Piero
    Watson, James E. M.
    Huntley, Brian
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2019, 10 (01)
  • [6] Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change
    Klein, RJT
    Nicholls, RJ
    AMBIO, 1999, 28 (02) : 182 - 187
  • [7] A climate change risk assessment in aquaculture in Korea
    Kim, Moo-Jin
    Han, In-Seong
    Lee, Joon-Soo
    Kim, Do-Hoon
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2024, 177 (06)
  • [8] Vulnerability of Korean water resources to climate change and population growth
    Chang, H.
    Franczyk, J.
    Im, E.-S.
    Kwon, W.-T.
    Bae, D.-H.
    Jung, I.-W.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 56 (04) : 57 - 62
  • [9] Vulnerability of airports on climate change: an assessment methodology
    Lopez, Aubin
    TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 : 24 - 31
  • [10] Assessment of climate change vulnerability of tourism in Hungary
    Csete, Maria
    Palvoelgyi, Tamas
    Szendro, Gabor
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2013, 13 (05) : 1043 - 1057