Prediction of Subsidence during TBM Operation in Mixed-Face Ground Conditions from Realtime Monitoring Data

被引:14
|
作者
Lee, Hyun-Koo [1 ]
Song, Myung-Kyu [2 ]
Lee, Sean Seungwon [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Earth Resources & Environm Engn, 222 Wangsimni Ro, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[2] Hyundai E&C, R&D Dept, 75 Yulgok Ro, Seoul 03058, South Korea
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 24期
关键词
tunnel boring machine (TBM) operation; TBM induced ground settlement; deep learning; long short-term memory (LSTM); machine data; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SURFACE SETTLEMENTS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.3390/app112412130
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The prediction of settlement during tunneling presents multiple challenges, as such settlement is governed by not only the local geology but also construction methods and practices, such as tunnel boring machine (TBM). To avoid undesirable settlement, engineers must predict the settlement under given conditions. The widely used methods are analytical solutions, empirical solutions, and numerical solutions. Analytical or empirical solutions, however, have limitations, which cannot incorporate the major causes of subsidence, such as unexpected geological conditions and TBM operational issues, among which cutterhead pressure and thrust force-related factors are the most influential. In settlement prediction, to utilize the machine data of TBM, two phases of long short-term memory (LSTM) models are devised. The first LSTM model is designed to capture the features affecting surface settlement. The second model is for the prediction of subsidence against the extracted features. One thing to note is that predicted subsidence is the evolution of settlement along TBM drive rather than its maximum value. The proposed deep-learning models are capable of predicting the subsidence of training and test sets with excellent accuracy, anticipating that it could be an effective tool for real-world tunneling and other underground construction projects.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Prediction of TBM performance in mixed-face ground conditions
    Vergara, Isaac Madrid
    Saroglou, Charalampos
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 69 : 116 - 124
  • [2] Field Monitoring on Ground-Borne Vibration Caused by TBM Excavating in Mixed-Face Conditions
    Liu, Meng-Bo
    Liao, Shao-Ming
    Men, Yan-Qing
    Sun, Lian-Yong
    GEO-CONGRESS 2022: DEEP FOUNDATIONS, EARTH RETENTION, AND UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 332 : 554 - 561
  • [3] TBM tunneling in mixed-face ground: Problems and solutions
    Ma Hongsu
    Yin Lijun
    Gong Qiuming
    Wang Ju
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 25 (04) : 641 - 647
  • [4] TBM tunneling in mixed-face ground: Problems and solutions
    Ma Hongsu
    Yin Lijun
    Gong Qiuming
    Wang Ju
    International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2015, 25 (04) : 641 - 647
  • [5] The significance of mixed-face conditions for TBM performance
    Steingrimsson, Jón Haukur
    Grøv, Eivind
    Nilsen, Bjøorn
    World Tunnelling, 2002, 15 (09): : 435 - 441
  • [6] Dynamic characteristic analysis of TBM tunnelling in mixed-face conditions
    Zhang, Kaizhi
    Yu, Haidong
    Liu, Zhongpo
    Lai, Xinmin
    SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2010, 18 (07) : 1019 - 1031
  • [7] Ground stabilization for tunnel construction in mixed-face conditions
    Darrag, AA
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 14 (03) : 319 - 326
  • [8] Estimation of the cutterhead torque for earth pressure balance TBM under mixed-face conditions
    Zhou, Xiao-Ping
    Zhai, Shu-Fang
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 74 : 217 - 229
  • [9] Prediction of disc cutter failure in shield tunnelling in mixed-face ground condition
    Ren, Dongjie
    Shen, Shuilong
    Yuan, Dajun
    NEW ADVANCES IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, : 256 - 259
  • [10] The mechanism of hysteretic ground settlement caused by shield tunneling in mixed-face conditions
    Ming-zhong Gao
    Zhi-long Zhang
    Zhi-qiang Qiu
    Chuan Xu
    Jian Zhao
    Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 2018, 4 : 51 - 61