The development and validation of a multivariable prognostic model to predict foot ulceration in diabetes using a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses

被引:31
|
作者
Crawford, F. [1 ]
Cezard, G. [2 ,3 ]
Chappell, F. M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Queen Margaret Hosp, NHS Fife, Res & Dev, Dunfermline, Fife, Scotland
[2] Univ St Andrews, SGSD, PHRG, Irvine Bldg, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst Populat Hlth Sci & Informat, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Clin Brain Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; PEOPLE; ULCERS; PRESSURE; IDENTIFY; WEST; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/dme.13797
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Diabetes guidelines recommend screening for the risk of foot ulceration but vary substantially in the underlying evidence base. Our purpose was to derive and validate a prognostic model of independent risk factors for foot ulceration in diabetes using all available individual patient data from cohort studies conducted worldwide. MethodsResultsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 10 cohort studies of risk factors in the prediction of foot ulceration in diabetes. Predictors were selected for plausibility, availability and low heterogeneity. Logistic regression produced adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for foot ulceration by ulceration history, monofilament insensitivity, any absent pedal pulse, age, sex and diabetes duration. The 10 studies contained data from 16385 participants. A history of foot ulceration produced the largest OR [6.59 (95% CI 2.49 to 17.45)], insensitivity to a 10g monofilament [3.18 (95% CI 2.65 to 3.82)] and any absent pedal pulse [1.97 (95% CI 1.62 to 2.39)] were consistently, independently predictive. Combining three predictors produced sensitivities between 90.0% (95% CI 69.9% to 97.2%) and 95.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 98.7%); the corresponding specificities were between 12.1% (95% CI 8.2% to 17.3%) and 63.9% (95% CI 61.1% to 66.6%). ConclusionsWhat's new?This prognostic model of only three risk factors, a history of foot ulceration, an inability to feel a 10g monofilament and the absence of any pedal pulse, compares favourably with more complex approaches to foot risk assessment recommended in clinical diabetes guidelines. Cohort studies to identify risk factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes have been published in the biomedical literature since the early 1990s. We assembled an international data set of risk factors collected from 16385 individuals with diabetes who took part in cohort studies to derive and validate a prognostic model of three risk factors: a history of foot ulceration, an inability to feel a 10g monofilament and at least one absent pedal pulse. The use of only these three risk factors in foot risk assessments during annual diabetes foot checks could reduce the amount of time spent assessing risk and thereby increase the number of people with diabetes who have checks performed. The frequency of risk assessment should be considered in future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1480 / 1493
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Overlapping research efforts in a global pandemic: a rapid systematic review of COVID-19-related individual participant data meta-analyses
    Maxwell, Lauren
    Shreedhar, Priya
    Levis, Brooke
    Chavan, Sayali Arvind
    Akter, Shaila
    Carabali, Mabel
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [42] Overlapping research efforts in a global pandemic: a rapid systematic review of COVID-19-related individual participant data meta-analyses
    Lauren Maxwell
    Priya Shreedhar
    Brooke Levis
    Sayali Arvind Chavan
    Shaila Akter
    Mabel Carabali
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [43] Conventional 99mTc-(hydroxy) methylene diphosphate remains useful to predict osteosarcoma response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy Individual patient data and aggregate data meta-analyses
    Kubo, Tadahiko
    Furuta, Taisuke
    Sakuda, Tomohiko
    Ochi, Mitsuo
    Adachi, Nobuo
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (51)
  • [44] Diagnostic accuracy of the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) for detecting major depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses
    Thombs, Brett D.
    Benedetti, Andrea
    Kloda, Lorie A.
    Levis, Brooke
    Azar, Marleine
    Riehm, Kira E.
    Saadat, Nazanin
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Gilbody, Simon
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    McMillan, Dean
    Patten, Scott B.
    Shrier, Ian
    Steele, Russell J.
    Ziegelstein, Roy C.
    Loiselle, Carmen G.
    Henry, Melissa
    Ismail, Zahinoor
    Mitchell, Nicholas
    Tonelli, Marcello
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (04):
  • [45] Understanding treatment-subgroup effect in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: An exploration using meta-analyses of individual patient data
    Roldan, Victor D. Torres
    Ponce, Oscar J.
    Urtecho, Meritxell
    Torres, Gabriel F.
    Belluzzo, Tereza
    Montori, Victor
    Liu, Carolina
    Barrera, Francisco
    Diaz, Alejandro
    Prokop, Larry
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Montori, Victor M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 139 : 160 - 166
  • [46] Meta-analyses using real-world data to generate clinical and epidemiological evidence: a systematic literature review of existing recommendations
    Briere, Jean-Baptiste
    Bowrin, Kevin
    Taieb, Vanessa
    Millier, Aurelie
    Toumi, Mondher
    Coleman, Craig
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2018, 34 (12) : 2125 - 2130
  • [47] Development and validation of a prognostic model for advanced gastric and oesophageal carcinoma (AGOC) using individual patient data from two clinical trials.
    Naher, Sayeda Kamrun
    Espinoza, David
    Grimison, Peter S.
    Shitara, Kohei
    Pavlakis, Nick
    Goldstein, David
    Stockler, Martin R.
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    Sjoquist, Katrin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 43 (4_SUPPL) : 499 - 499
  • [48] Development of a prognostic model for prevalent atrial fibrillation using individual patient data: Results of CATCH ME
    Chua, W.
    Easter, C. L.
    Guasch, E.
    Sitch, A.
    Casadei, B.
    Haase, D.
    Hatem, S.
    Kaab, S.
    Mont, L.
    Schotten, U.
    Sinner, M.
    Hemming, K.
    Deeks, J. J.
    Kirchhof, P.
    Fabritz, L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 3533 - 3533
  • [49] Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
    Williams, Louise R.
    Ali, Myzoon
    VandenBerg, Kathryn
    Williams, Linda J.
    Abo, Masahiro
    Becker, Frank
    Bowen, Audrey
    Brandenburg, Caitlin
    Breitenstein, Caterina
    Bruehl, Stefanie
    Copland, David A.
    Cranfill, Tamara B.
    Di Pietro-Bachmann, Marie
    Enderby, Pamela
    Fillingham, Joanne
    Galli, Federica Lucia
    Gandolfi, Marialuisa
    Glize, Bertrand
    Godecke, Erin
    Hawkins, Neil
    Hilari, Katerina
    Hinckley, Jacqueline
    Horton, Simon
    Howard, David
    Jaecks, Petra
    Jefferies, Elizabeth
    Jesus, Luis M. T.
    Kambanaros, Maria
    Kang, Eun Kyoung
    Khedr, Eman M.
    Kong, Anthony Pak-Hin
    Kukkonen, Tarja
    Laganaro, Marina
    Ralph, Matthew A. Lambon
    Laska, Ann Charlotte
    Leemann, Beatrice
    Leff, Alexander P.
    Lima, Roxele Ribeiro
    Lorenz, Antje
    MacWhinney, Brian
    Marshall, Rebecca Shisler
    Mattioli, Flavia
    Mavis, Iiknur
    Meinzer, Marcus
    Nilipour, Reza
    Noe, Enrique
    Paik, Nam-Jong
    Palmer, Rebecca
    Papathanasiou, Ilias
    Patricio, Brigida F.
    APHASIOLOGY, 2022, 36 (04) : 513 - 533
  • [50] Efficacy and Safety of Oral Chinese Herbal Medicine for Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Using Robust Variance Estimation Model
    Lyu, Shaohua
    Zhang, Claire Shuiqing
    Guo, Xinfeng
    Zhang, Anthony Lin
    Sun, Jingbo
    Chen, Genghang
    Xue, Charlie Changli
    Luo, Xiaodong
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13