The development and validation of a multivariable prognostic model to predict foot ulceration in diabetes using a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses

被引:31
|
作者
Crawford, F. [1 ]
Cezard, G. [2 ,3 ]
Chappell, F. M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Queen Margaret Hosp, NHS Fife, Res & Dev, Dunfermline, Fife, Scotland
[2] Univ St Andrews, SGSD, PHRG, Irvine Bldg, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst Populat Hlth Sci & Informat, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Clin Brain Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; PEOPLE; ULCERS; PRESSURE; IDENTIFY; WEST; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/dme.13797
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Diabetes guidelines recommend screening for the risk of foot ulceration but vary substantially in the underlying evidence base. Our purpose was to derive and validate a prognostic model of independent risk factors for foot ulceration in diabetes using all available individual patient data from cohort studies conducted worldwide. MethodsResultsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 10 cohort studies of risk factors in the prediction of foot ulceration in diabetes. Predictors were selected for plausibility, availability and low heterogeneity. Logistic regression produced adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for foot ulceration by ulceration history, monofilament insensitivity, any absent pedal pulse, age, sex and diabetes duration. The 10 studies contained data from 16385 participants. A history of foot ulceration produced the largest OR [6.59 (95% CI 2.49 to 17.45)], insensitivity to a 10g monofilament [3.18 (95% CI 2.65 to 3.82)] and any absent pedal pulse [1.97 (95% CI 1.62 to 2.39)] were consistently, independently predictive. Combining three predictors produced sensitivities between 90.0% (95% CI 69.9% to 97.2%) and 95.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 98.7%); the corresponding specificities were between 12.1% (95% CI 8.2% to 17.3%) and 63.9% (95% CI 61.1% to 66.6%). ConclusionsWhat's new?This prognostic model of only three risk factors, a history of foot ulceration, an inability to feel a 10g monofilament and the absence of any pedal pulse, compares favourably with more complex approaches to foot risk assessment recommended in clinical diabetes guidelines. Cohort studies to identify risk factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes have been published in the biomedical literature since the early 1990s. We assembled an international data set of risk factors collected from 16385 individuals with diabetes who took part in cohort studies to derive and validate a prognostic model of three risk factors: a history of foot ulceration, an inability to feel a 10g monofilament and at least one absent pedal pulse. The use of only these three risk factors in foot risk assessments during annual diabetes foot checks could reduce the amount of time spent assessing risk and thereby increase the number of people with diabetes who have checks performed. The frequency of risk assessment should be considered in future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1480 / 1493
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preventing foot ulceration in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analyses of RCT data
    Fay Crawford
    Donald J. Nicolson
    Aparna E. Amanna
    Angela Martin
    Saket Gupta
    Graham P. Leese
    Robert Heggie
    Francesca M. Chappell
    Heather H. McIntosh
    Diabetologia, 2020, 63 : 49 - 64
  • [2] Preventing foot ulceration in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analyses of RCT data
    Crawford, Fay
    Nicolson, Donald J.
    Amanna, Aparna E.
    Martin, Angela
    Gupta, Saket
    Leese, Graham P.
    Heggie, Robert
    Chappell, Francesca M.
    McIntosh, Heather H.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2020, 63 (01) : 49 - 64
  • [3] A systematic review of individual patient data meta-analyses on surgical interventions.
    Hannink G.
    Gooszen H.G.
    van Laarhoven C.J.
    Rovers M.M.
    Systematic Reviews, 2 (1) : 52
  • [4] Development and validation of a prediction model for birthweight using individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses
    Allotey, John
    Archer, Lucider
    Coomar, Dyuti
    Riley, Richard
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 17 - 17
  • [5] A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS)
    Crawford, Fay
    Cezard, Genevieve
    Chappell, Francesca M.
    Murray, Gordon D.
    Price, Jacqueline F.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Simpson, Colin R.
    Stansby, Gerard P.
    Young, Matthew J.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (57) : 1 - +
  • [6] A systematic review of analytical methods used to study subgroups in (individual patient data) meta-analyses
    Koopman, Laura
    van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G.
    Glasziou, Paul P.
    Grobbee, Diederick E.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (10) : 1002 - 1009
  • [7] Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors of foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS)
    Fay Crawford
    Chantelle Anandan
    Francesca M Chappell
    Gordon D Murray
    Jacqueline F Price
    Aziz Sheikh
    Colin R Simpson
    Martin Maxwell
    Gerard P Stansby
    Matthew J Young
    Caroline A Abbott
    Andrew JM Boulton
    Edward J Boyko
    Thomas Kastenbauer
    Graham P Leese
    Matteo Monami
    Matilde Monteiro-Soares
    Stephen J Rith-Najarian
    Aristidis Veves
    Nikki Coates
    William J Jeffcoate
    Nicola Leech
    Tom Fahey
    Jayne Tierney
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13
  • [8] Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors of foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS)
    Crawford, Fay
    Anandan, Chantelle
    Chappell, Francesca M.
    Murray, Gordon D.
    Price, Jacqueline F.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Simpson, Colin R.
    Maxwell, Martin
    Stansby, Gerard P.
    Young, Matthew J.
    Abbott, Caroline A.
    Boulton, Andrew J. M.
    Boyko, Edward J.
    Kastenbauer, Thomas
    Leese, Graham P.
    Monami, Matteo
    Monteiro-Soares, Matilde
    Rith-Najarian, Stephen J.
    Veves, Aristidis
    Coates, Nikki
    Jeffcoate, William J.
    Leech, Nicola
    Fahey, Tom
    Tierney, Jayne
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13 : 22
  • [9] Development and validation of a prediction model for fetal growth restriction using individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses
    Allotey, John
    Archer, Lucinda
    Coomar, Dyuti
    Riley, Richard
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 16 - 17
  • [10] Reading, Conducting, and Developing Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analyses in Psychiatry for Treatment Issues
    Nadia, Younes
    Laurie-Anne, Claude
    Xavier, Paoletti
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12