Leveraging State Cancer Registries to Measure and Improve the Quality of Cancer Care: A Potential Strategy for California and Beyond

被引:25
|
作者
Hiatt, Robert A. [1 ]
Tai, Caroline G. [1 ]
Blayney, Douglas W. [2 ]
Deapen, Dennis [3 ]
Hogarth, Michael [4 ]
Kizer, Kenneth W. [5 ]
Lipscomb, Joseph [6 ]
Malin, Jennifer [7 ]
Phillips, Stephen K. [8 ]
Santa, John [9 ]
Schrag, Deborah [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford Canc Inst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Div Epidemiol, Prevent Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Inst Populat Hlth Improvement, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[6] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[7] WellPoint Inc, Oncol & Care Management, Thousand Oaks, CA USA
[8] Hooper Lundy & Bookman PC, San Francisco, CA USA
[9] Consumer Reports Hlth, Yonkers, NY USA
[10] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djv047
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Despite recent increased attention to healthcare performance and the burden of disease from cancer, measures of quality of cancer care are not readily available. In 2013, the California HealthCare Foundation convened an expert workgroup to explore the potential for leveraging data in the California Cancer Registry (CCR), one of the world's largest population-based cancer registries, for measuring and improving the quality of cancer care. The workgroup assessed current registry operations, the value to be gained by linking CCR data with health insurance claims or encounter data and clinical data contained in health system electronic health records, and potential barriers to these linkages. The workgroup concluded that: 1) The CCR mandate should be expanded to include use of its data for quality of cancer care measurement and public reporting; and 2) a system should be developed to support linkage of registry data with both claims data and provider electronic health record data.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The potential and limitations of data from population-based state cancer registries
    Izquierdo, JN
    Schoenbach, VJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 90 (05) : 695 - 698
  • [32] Wise Choices to Improve the Quality of Lung Cancer Care
    Ost, David E.
    CHEST, 2016, 149 (04) : 889 - 890
  • [33] The State of Cancer Care in America: Impact of State Policy on Access to High-Quality Cancer Care
    Johnson, Terrell
    Bandini, Lindsey A. M.
    Martin, Kara
    Jones, Lee
    Carlson, Jennifer
    Walters, Ronald S.
    Carlson, Robert W.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2020, 18 (04): : 400 - 404
  • [34] Hereditary cancer registries improve the care of patients with a genetic predisposition to cancer: contributions from the Dutch Lynch syndrome registry
    Vasen, Hans F. A.
    Velthuizen, Mary E.
    Kleibeuker, Jan H.
    Menko, Fred H.
    Nagengast, Fokke M.
    Cats, Annemieke
    van der Meulen-de Jong, Andrea E.
    Breuning, Martijn H.
    Roukema, Anne J.
    van Leeuwen-Cornelisse, Inge
    Cappel, Wouter H. de Vos Tot Nederveen
    Wijnen, Juul T.
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (03) : 429 - 435
  • [35] Hereditary cancer registries improve the care of patients with a genetic predisposition to cancer: contributions from the Dutch Lynch syndrome registry
    Hans F. A. Vasen
    Mary E. Velthuizen
    Jan H. Kleibeuker
    Fred H. Menko
    Fokke M. Nagengast
    Annemieke Cats
    Andrea E. van der Meulen-de Jong
    Martijn H. Breuning
    Anne J. Roukema
    Inge van Leeuwen-Cornelisse
    Wouter H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel
    Juul T. Wijnen
    Familial Cancer, 2016, 15 : 429 - 435
  • [36] Results of the national initiative for cancer care quality: How can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States?
    Malin, JL
    Schneider, EC
    Epstein, AM
    Adams, J
    Emanuel, EJ
    Kahn, KL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (04) : 626 - 634
  • [37] Should Reexcision Rates in Breast Cancer Care be a Quality Measure?
    Anees B. Chagpar
    Lee G. Wilke
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 2818 - 2822
  • [38] Adherence to Treatment Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer as a Measure of Quality Care
    Bristow, Robert E.
    Chang, Jenny
    Ziogas, Argyrios
    Anton-Culver, Hoda
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (06): : 1226 - 1234
  • [39] Should Reexcision Rates in Breast Cancer Care be a Quality Measure?
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    Wilke, Lee G.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (10) : 2818 - 2822
  • [40] Leveraging opportunities of the pandemic: Optimal cancer care during and beyond COVID-19
    Keefe, Dorothy
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 : 60 - 60