Brief Tailored Smoking Cessation Counseling in a Lung Cancer Screening Population is Feasible: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:29
|
作者
Marshall, Henry M. [1 ]
Courtney, Deborah A. [1 ]
Passmore, Linda H. [1 ]
McCaul, Elizabeth M. [1 ]
Yang, Ian A. [1 ]
Bowman, Rayleen V. [1 ]
Fong, Kwun M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Thorac Res Ctr, Prince Charles Hosp, Rode Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4032, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
PRIMARY-CARE PROVIDERS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; INTERVENTION; ATTITUDES; PARTICIPANTS; PERCEPTIONS; DEPENDENCE; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1093/ntr/ntw010
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Maximizing smoking abstinence in lung cancer screening participants is important to reduce individual risk of disease and improve screening cost-effectiveness; however, the optimal strategy remains undefined. We hypothesized that a single session of tailored face-to-face counseling on the day of screening CT scan, coupled with audio and printed cessation information would be feasible to deliver in a CT screening trial. Methods: We randomized volunteer smokers in the Queensland Lung Cancer Screening Study to intervention (counseling session, audio quit materials, printed quit materials, Quitline contact details) or control group (printed quit materials, Quitline contact details). Participants self-reported point prevalence quit rates at 1 year. Results: Fifty-five smokers were enrolled; 28 randomized to intervention and 27 controls. Median cigarette consumption was 25/day; 54/55 smoked at least 15 cigarettes per day. Median smoking duration was 46 years. Median Fagerstrom dependence score was 6. In total 58% did not report any quit attempt in the prior 12 months. Mean duration of counseling was 26.5 minutes. After 1 year, four participants (14.3%) in the intervention group and five participants (18.5%) in the control group had quit (P = .74). Combined annual point prevalence quit rate was 16.4%. Conclusions: Although feasible to deliver a single session of tailored counseling on the day of screening this intervention had no discernible impact on cessation over and above printed materials and Quitline access. As participants exhibited hardcore smoking characteristics, more intensive strategies, in larger cohorts, should be explored. Implications: The optimal smoking cessation strategy within a lung cancer screening program is not known. This study demonstrates that a single session of counseling can be feasibly delivered on the day of screening but may not have been intensive enough for long-term, hard-core smokers.
引用
收藏
页码:1665 / 1669
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Behavioral cessation treatment of waterpipe smoking: The first pilot randomized controlled trial
    Asfar, Taghrid
    Al Ali, Radwan
    Rastam, Samer
    Maziak, Wasim
    Ward, Kenneth D.
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2014, 39 (06) : 1066 - 1074
  • [42] Behavioral Activation mHealth Application for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
    Heffner, Jaimee L.
    Serfozo, Edit
    Baker, Kelsey
    Gasser, Melissa
    Watson, Noreen
    Daughters, Stacey B.
    Becona, Elisardo
    McClure, Jennifer B.
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2024, 27 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [43] Approach bias retraining to augment smoking cessation: A pilot randomized controlled trial
    Smits, Jasper A. J.
    Rinck, Mike
    Rosenfield, David
    Beevers, Christopher G.
    Brown, Richard A.
    Busch, Haley E. Conroy
    Dutcher, Christina D.
    Perrone, Alex
    Zvolensky, Michael J.
    Garey, Lorra
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2022, 238
  • [44] A Digital Smoking Cessation Program for Heavy Drinkers: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kahler, Christopher W.
    Cohn, Amy M.
    Costantino, Catherine
    Toll, Benjamin A.
    Spillane, Nichea S.
    Graham, Amanda L.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2020, 4 (06)
  • [45] A Perioperative Smoking Cessation Intervention With Varenicline, Counseling, and Fax Referral to a Telephone Quitline Versus a Brief Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wong, Jean
    Abrishami, Amir
    Riazi, Sheila
    Siddiqui, Naveed
    You-Ten, Eric
    Korman, Jennifer
    Islam, Sazzadul
    Chen, Xin
    Andrawes, Maged S. M.
    Selby, Peter
    Wong, David T.
    Chung, Frances
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 125 (02): : 571 - 579
  • [46] Smoking cessation and lung cancer screening
    Pedersen, Jesper Holst
    Tonnesen, Philip
    Ashraf, Haseem
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (08)
  • [47] Smoking cessation and lung cancer screening
    Peiffer, G.
    Underner, M.
    Perriot, J.
    Ruppert, A-M
    Tiotiu, A.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2020, 37 (09) : 722 - 734
  • [48] A randomized controlled trial to compare group motivational interviewing to very brief advice for the effectiveness of a workplace smoking cessation counseling intervention
    Caponnetto, Pasquale
    Maglia, Marilena
    Floresta, Daniele
    Ledda, Caterina
    Vitale, Ermanno
    Polosa, Riccardo
    Rapisarda, Venerando
    JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 2020, 38 (04) : 465 - 474
  • [49] Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Community-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Carter-Harris, Lisa
    Comer, Robert Skipworth
    Slaven, James E., II
    Monahan, Patrick O.
    Vode, Emilee
    Hanna, Nasser H.
    Ceppa, DuyKhanh Pham
    Rawl, Susan M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (11)
  • [50] A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF HYPNOTHERAPY FOR SMOKING CESSATION
    LAMBE, R
    OSIER, C
    FRANKS, P
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1986, 22 (01): : 61 - 65