Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study

被引:16
|
作者
Haugom, Espen W. [1 ,2 ]
Stensrud, Bjorn [1 ]
Beston, Gro [1 ]
Ruud, Torleif [3 ,4 ]
Landheim, Anne S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Concurrent Subst Abu, PB 104, N-2381 Brumunddal, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Ctr Addict Res SERAF, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[5] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Elverum, Norway
关键词
Shared decision making; psychotic disorders; mental health services; qualitative research; MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; RECOVERY; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTIONS; MEDICATION; ENCOUNTER; CAPACITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is a process where the patient and the health professional collaborate to make decisions based on both the patient's preferences and the best available evidence. Patients with psychotic disorders are less involved in making decisions than they would like. More knowledge of these patients' experiences of SDM may improve implementation. The study aim was to describe and explore experiences of SDM among patients with psychotic disorders in mental health care. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with ten persons with a psychotic disorder. They were service users of two community mental health centres. The transcribed material was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Four-fifths of the participants in this study found that they received insufficient information about their health situation and treatment options. All participants experienced that only one kind of treatment was often presented, which was usually medication. Although the study found that different degrees of involvement were practised, two thirds of the participants had little impact on choices to be made. This was despite the fact that they wanted to participate and felt capable of participating, even during periods of more severe illness. The participants described how important it was that SDM in psychosis was based on a trusting relationship, but stated that it took time to establish such a relationship. Conclusions This study with ten participants indicates that patients with psychotic disorders experienced that they were not allowed to participate as much as they wanted to and believed they were capable of. Some patients were involved, but to a lesser degree than in SDM. More and better tailored information communicated within a trusting relationship is needed to provide psychotic patients with a better basis for active involvement in decisions about their health care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] NEEDS AND EXPERIENCES OF PATIENTS AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS TOWARDS SHARED DECISION MAKING IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA CLINICAL PRACTICE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY IN EUROPE
    Schoefs, E.
    Verbeke, C.
    Broekmans, J.
    ten Seldam, S.
    Morgan, K.
    Joyner, K.
    Aviv, A.
    Shoham, V
    Vanhellemont, A.
    Delforge, M.
    Huys, I
    Janssens, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S473 - S473
  • [22] Experiences of bereaved family caregivers with shared decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a qualitative interview study
    Sanne P. C. van Oosterhout
    Daisy J. M. Ermers
    Floor K. Ploos van Amstel
    Carla M. L. van Herpen
    Yvonne Schoon
    Marieke Perry
    Maartje van Geel
    Evelien J. M. Kuip
    Yvonne Engels
    BMC Palliative Care, 20
  • [23] Experiences of bereaved family caregivers with shared decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a qualitative interview study
    van Oosterhout, Sanne P. C.
    Ermers, Daisy J. M.
    Ploos van Amstel, Floor K.
    van Herpen, Carla M. L.
    Schoon, Yvonne
    Perry, Marieke
    van Geel, Maartje
    Kuip, Evelien J. M.
    Engels, Yvonne
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [24] Roles of general practitioners in shared decision-making for patients with cancer: A qualitative study
    Abma, Inger L.
    Roelofs, Lianne C. G.
    van der Kolk, Marion B.
    Mulder, Sasja F.
    Schers, Henk J.
    Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (04)
  • [25] Shared decision-making with involuntary hospital patients: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators
    Giacco, Domenico
    Mavromara, Liza
    Gamblen, Jennifer
    Conneely, Maev
    Priebe, Stefan
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2018, 4 (03): : 113 - 118
  • [26] Patients' perspectives on shared decision making in secondary mental healthcare in Taiwan: A qualitative study
    Lin, Chiu-Yi
    Renwick, Laoise
    Lovell, Karina
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (12) : 2565 - 2570
  • [27] Differences In Shared Decision Making Among Patients With Hypertension
    Elias, Sabrina
    Perrin, Nancy
    Wenzel, Jennifer
    Slone, Sarah
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Turkson-Ocran, Ruth-Alma
    Ogungbe, Oluwabunmi
    Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne
    Himmelfarb, Cheryl R.
    HYPERTENSION, 2023, 80
  • [28] The Patient Experience With Shared Decision Making: A Qualitative Descriptive Study
    Truglio-Londrigan, Marie
    JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2015, 38 (06) : 407 - 418
  • [29] Qualitative study of medical decision making among patients with hidradenitis suppurativa
    Sow, Y.
    Salame, N.
    Siira, M.
    Flowers, N.
    Garg, A.
    Kavalieratos, D.
    Patzer, R.
    Chen, S. C.
    Orenstein, L.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 142 (08) : S61 - S61
  • [30] What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening
    Melzer, Anne C.
    Golden, Sara E.
    Ono, Sarah S.
    Datta, Santanu
    Crothers, Kristina
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (02) : 546 - 553