Liver Function, Quantified by LiMAx Test, After Major Abdominal Surgery. Comparison Between Open and Laparoscopic Approach

被引:9
|
作者
Kaffarnik, Magnus [1 ]
Stoeger, Gabriel [1 ]
Liebich, Julia [1 ]
Grieser, Christian [2 ]
Pratschke, Johann [1 ]
Stockmann, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Virchow Klinikum, Dept Surg, Clin Surg, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Radiol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
MULTIPLE-ORGAN FAILURE; INDOCYANINE GREEN; EARLY-DIAGNOSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; BLOOD-FLOW; SEPSIS; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; DOPPLER; ESOPHAGECTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-017-4170-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Major abdominal surgery may lead to a systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) with a risk of organ failure. One possible trigger for a postoperative hepatic dysfunction is an altered hepatic blood flow during SIRS, resulting in a decreased oxygen delivery. This pilot study investigated the role of liver dysfunction measured by the LiMAx test after major abdominal surgery, focussing on open and laparoscopic surgical approaches. We prospectively investigated 25 patients (7 females and 18 males, age range 55-72 years) scheduled for upper abdominal surgery. The LiMAx test, ICG-PDR and duplex sonography were carried out preoperatively, followed by postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 5 and 10. Laboratory parameters and clinical parameters were measured daily. Clinical outcome parameters were examined at the end of treatment. The population was divided into group A (laparotomy) versus group B (laparoscopy). LiMAx values decreased significantly on POD 1 (290 A mu g/kg/h, P < 0.001), followed by a significant increase at POD 3 (348 A mu g/kg/h, P = 0.013). Only INR showed a significant increase on POD 1 (1.26, P < 0.001). Duplex sonography and ICG-PDR revealed a hyper-dynamic liver blood flow. No differences between group A and B were found. Hepatic dysfunction after major abdominal surgery is evident and underestimated. The LiMAx test provides an adequate tool to determine liver dysfunction. Open and laparoscopic approaches appeared similar in terms of liver dysfunction and postoperative SIRS.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 566
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Motoric function during patient-controlled analgesia via a lumbar epidural catheter after major abdominal surgery. Ropivacoine-sufentanil vs. bupivacoine-sufentanil
    Eberhart, LHJ
    Lehle, B
    Kiefer, P
    Reuss, M
    Weinberger, J
    Wulf, H
    Gelder, G
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2002, 37 (04): : 216 - 221
  • [42] Minimally Invasive Anatomic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the Extrahepatic Glissonian Approach: Surgical Techniques and Comparison of Outcomes with the Open Approach and between the Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches
    Kato, Yutaro
    Sugioka, Atsushi
    Kojima, Masayuki
    Mii, Satoshi
    Uchida, Yuichiro
    Iwama, Hideaki
    Mizumoto, Takuya
    Takahara, Takeshi
    Uyama, Ichiro
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [43] RETRACTION: Does age affect liver function and the hepatic acute phase response after major abdominal surgery? (Retraction of Vol 27, Pg 1262, 2001)
    Suttner, Stefan W.
    Suerder, Claudia
    Lang, Katrin
    Piper, Swen N.
    Kumle, Bernhard
    Boldt, Joachim
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 49 (08) : 1045 - 1045
  • [44] Katabole Stressantwort während und nach abdominalchirurgischen Eingriffen Ein Vergleich zwischen zwei AnästhesieverfahrenCatabolic stress response during and after abdominal surgery. Comparison between two anaesthesia procedures
    R. Lattermann
    U. Wachter
    M. Georgieff
    A. Goertz
    T. Schricker
    Der Anaesthesist, 2003, 52 (6) : 500 - 506
  • [45] EVALUATION OF NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE IN OBESE PATIENTS - COMPARISON BETWEEN CLINICAL SCORING SYSTEMS AND NON-INVASIVE LIVER FUNCTION TEST NASH and bariatric surgery
    Schmitz, S.
    Kroh, A.
    Ulmer, F.
    Andruszkow, J.
    Luedde, T.
    Neumann, U.
    Alizai, P.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 : 810 - 810
  • [46] Does the surgical technique impact the oncologic outcomes after partial nephrectomy? A comparison between open, laparoscopic and robotic approach in a single high-volume tertiary center
    Piazza, P.
    Bianchi, L.
    Chessa, F.
    Mottaran, A.
    Pultrone, C., V
    Ercolino, A.
    Di Fresco, S.
    Casablanca, C.
    Droghetti, M.
    Angiolini, A.
    Beretta, C.
    Recenti, D.
    Bertaccini, A.
    Roveroni, C.
    Cacciapuoti, C.
    Boschi, S.
    Balestrazzi, E.
    Berrino, P. M.
    Puliatti, S.
    Amato, M.
    Schiavina, R.
    Brunocilla, E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S193 - S194
  • [47] Patients Older Than 80 Years Can Reach Their Normal Life Expectancy After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Comparison Between Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Surgery
    Majd, Payman
    Ahmad, Wael
    Galas, Noemi
    Brunkwall, Jan S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2018, 25 (02) : 247 - 251
  • [48] Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: Comparison between traditional open surgery and full-robotic approach with da Vinci Xi
    Morelli, Luca
    Di Franco, Gregorio
    Furbetta, Niccolo
    Palmeri, Matteo
    Guadagni, Simone
    Gianardi, Desiree
    Carpenito, Cristina
    Comandatore, Annalisa
    Giovannetti, Elisa
    Di Candio, Giulio
    Cuschieri, Alfred
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2024, 20 (01):
  • [49] Postoperative quality of recovery comparison between ciprofol and propofol in total intravenous anesthesia for elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic major abdominal surgery: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
    Liang, Zenghui
    Liu, Jing
    Chen, Shuhan
    Zhao, Xiaona
    Chen, Gezi
    Xie, Yanle
    Wang, Dongmei
    Xing, Fei
    Mao, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Zhongyu
    Yuan, Jingjing
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 99
  • [50] DOES THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE IMPACT THE ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES AFTER PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY? A COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN, LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC APPROACH IN A SINGLE HIGH-VOLUME TERTIARY CENTER.
    Chessa, Francesco
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Borghesi, Marco
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Pultrone, Cristian
    Di Fresco, Serena
    Casablanca, Carlo
    Beretta, Carlo
    Guerra, Marco
    Piazza, Pietro
    Sartorio, Fabrizio
    Angiolini, Andrea
    Barbaresi, Umberto
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E610 - E611