Managing the Uncertainty of Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Software Predictive Analytics

被引:0
|
作者
Mittas, Nikolaos [1 ]
Angelis, Lefteris [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Informat, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Software cost estimation; project management; prediction models; bias; variance; visualization tools;
D O I
10.1109/SEAA.2016.30
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The importance of providing accurate estimations of software cost in management life cycle has led to an overabundant pool of prediction candidates exhibiting certain advantages and limitations. Thus, there is an imperative need for well-established principles that will aid the right decision-making regarding the selection of the best candidate. Unfortunately, the choice of the most appropriate estimation technique is not a trivial task, due to the multi-faceted nature of error. Accuracy, bias and variance are notions describing different aspects of predictive power that someone has to take into consideration during the validation process. The main objective of this paper is the utilization of visual analytics for the evaluation of two fundamental ingredients of prediction accuracy: the bias and the variance. Through a bootstrap-based resampling algorithm, we provide an easy-to-interpret way in order to acquire significant knowledge about the quality of a prediction candidate and manage the uncertainty of the estimation process. Ensemble techniques utilizing the advantages of both simple and complex solo methods are possible balancing solutions to the problem of the bias-variance tradeoff.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 358
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Applications of the bias-variance decomposition to human forecasting
    Kane, Patrick Bodilly
    Broomell, Stephen B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 98
  • [42] BIAS-VARIANCE TRADEOFFS IN FUNCTIONAL ESTIMATION PROBLEMS
    LOW, MG
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1995, 23 (03): : 824 - 835
  • [43] Transfer Importance Sampling - How Testing Automated Vehicles in Multiple Test Setups Helps With the Bias-Variance Tradeoff
    Winkelmann, Max
    Vasconi, Constantin
    Muller, Steffen
    [J]. 2022 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2022, : 26 - 31
  • [44] A novel approach to the bias-variance problem in bump hunting
    Williams, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2017, 12
  • [45] Robust Ranking Model via Bias-Variance Optimization
    Li, Jinzhong
    Liu, Guanjun
    Xia, Jiewu
    [J]. INTELLIGENT COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES, ICIC 2017, PT III, 2017, 10363 : 706 - 718
  • [46] Bias-variance control via hard points shaving
    Merler, S
    Caprile, B
    Furlanello, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2004, 18 (05) : 891 - 903
  • [47] On the stability and bias-variance analysis of kernel matrix learning
    Saradhi, V. Vijaya
    Karnick, Harish
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 4509 : 441 - +
  • [48] Conceptual complexity and the bias/variance tradeoff
    Briscoe, Erica
    Feldman, Jacob
    [J]. COGNITION, 2011, 118 (01) : 2 - 16
  • [49] There’s no such thing as a free lunchThe Bias-Variance dilemma
    Vivek S. Borkar
    [J]. Resonance, 1998, 3 (6) : 40 - 51
  • [50] Bias-variance analysis for controlling adaptive surface meshes
    Wilson, RC
    Hancock, ER
    [J]. COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2000, 77 (01) : 25 - 47