Producer Groups in the Czech Republic, Slovak Republic and Republic of Poland and their Market Share Potential

被引:0
|
作者
Kotyza, Pavel [1 ]
Hornowski, Andrzej [2 ]
Elisova, Katerina [1 ]
机构
[1] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Warsaw Univ Life Sci, Warsaw, Poland
来源
关键词
Producer Groups; Poland; Czech Republic; Slovakia; EU; Support; Market Share; Rural Development;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Collective cooperation in rural areas is not just a phenomenon of the past. Marketing cooperatives in the agricultural sector are hotly debated worldwide. The main benefits of collective actions can include the benefits of size, sharing of knowledge and information, effective solution of local problems. To support collective actions the governments of all these three countries had decided to support the creation of marketing organisations after joining the EU. For that reason they provided public financial support for newly established producer groups and the allocation was realized on the basis of the Rural Development Programme with the aim, among others, to increase market share potential of individual farmers. Based on data obtained from paying agencies, it can be concluded that there were not established a large number of market-significant groups within individual states and commodity groups. Only in Slovakia, under the first programming period, there were groups with a significant share, i.e. a share above 15%. In the next period, as in other countries, only cooperatives with a low share on the relevant market were supported. At the same time it was found that the rate of sales of active entities did not change significantly between Czech and Slovak entities. In most cases, sales are in the range of (sic) 1-5 million. In Poland, cooperatives with revenues above (sic) I million/year were established but there was also registered a significant number of cooperatives with sales below El million.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 459
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] eHealth in the Czech Republic and Poland
    Ardielli, Eva
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF BORDER AREAS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND POLAND, 2016, : 9 - 16
  • [32] The research on Slovak history in the Czech Republic
    Rychlik, J
    [J]. HISTORICKY CASOPIS, 2004, 52 (02): : 363 - 374
  • [33] BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IN SLOVAK AND CZECH REPUBLIC
    Hintosova, Aneta Bobenic
    Bruothova, Michaela
    [J]. SGEM 2016, BK 2: POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL IV, 2016, : 153 - 160
  • [34] KROVAK'S PROJECTION AND ITS USE FOR THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
    Veverka, Bohuslav
    [J]. 50 YEARS OF THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF GEODESY, TOPOGRAPHY AND CARTOGRAPHY: JUBILEE PROCEEDINGS, 1954-2004, 2005, 50 (36): : 173 - 179
  • [35] CUSTOMS UNION BETWEEN THE CZECH-REPUBLIC AND SLOVAK-REPUBLIC
    SOUKUP, P
    [J]. POLITICKA EKONOMIE, 1995, 43 (02) : 175 - 186
  • [36] The Wages of Male and Female ICT Managers in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic
    Marek, Lubos
    Doucek, Petr
    [J]. VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 3525 - 3533
  • [37] INTERREGIONAL DISPARITIES IN THE SLOVAK AND CZECH REPUBLIC
    Ivanova, Eva
    Koisova, Eva
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM, VOL IV, 2014, : 405 - 412
  • [38] PROPAGANDA AND DISINFORMATION IN THE SLOVAK AND CZECH REPUBLIC
    Gombar, Miroslav
    Sisulak, Stanislav
    Cichova, Martina
    Krasna, Patricia
    Malicek, Vladimir
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2024, 11 (03): : 375 - 386
  • [39] Q fever - Distribution and importance of this disease in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic
    Literak, I
    Rehacek, J
    [J]. VETERINARNI MEDICINA, 1996, 41 (02) : 45 - 63
  • [40] Transformation and its modernization elements: Comparing Czech Republic with Slovak Republic
    Gatnar, L
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA, 1996, 28 (04): : 299 - 308