Producer Groups in the Czech Republic, Slovak Republic and Republic of Poland and their Market Share Potential

被引:0
|
作者
Kotyza, Pavel [1 ]
Hornowski, Andrzej [2 ]
Elisova, Katerina [1 ]
机构
[1] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Warsaw Univ Life Sci, Warsaw, Poland
来源
关键词
Producer Groups; Poland; Czech Republic; Slovakia; EU; Support; Market Share; Rural Development;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Collective cooperation in rural areas is not just a phenomenon of the past. Marketing cooperatives in the agricultural sector are hotly debated worldwide. The main benefits of collective actions can include the benefits of size, sharing of knowledge and information, effective solution of local problems. To support collective actions the governments of all these three countries had decided to support the creation of marketing organisations after joining the EU. For that reason they provided public financial support for newly established producer groups and the allocation was realized on the basis of the Rural Development Programme with the aim, among others, to increase market share potential of individual farmers. Based on data obtained from paying agencies, it can be concluded that there were not established a large number of market-significant groups within individual states and commodity groups. Only in Slovakia, under the first programming period, there were groups with a significant share, i.e. a share above 15%. In the next period, as in other countries, only cooperatives with a low share on the relevant market were supported. At the same time it was found that the rate of sales of active entities did not change significantly between Czech and Slovak entities. In most cases, sales are in the range of (sic) 1-5 million. In Poland, cooperatives with revenues above (sic) I million/year were established but there was also registered a significant number of cooperatives with sales below El million.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 459
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INSURANCE MARKET IN SLOVAK REPUBLIC AND CZECH REPUBLIC
    Masarova, Jana
    Koisova, Eva
    [J]. SGEM 2016, BK 2: POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL III, 2016, : 353 - 360
  • [2] Financing of Culture in the Czech Republic, Slovak Republic and Poland
    Novakova, Jitka
    [J]. MODERN AND CURRENT TRENDS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR RESEARCH, 2012, : 226 - 233
  • [3] VALUATION OF EQUITY RELEASE CONTRACTS IN CZECH REPUBLIC, REPUBLIC OF POLAND AND SLOVAK REPUBLIC
    Marciniuk, Agnieszka
    Zimkova, Emilia
    Farkasovsky, Vlastimil
    Lawson, Colin W.
    [J]. PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2020, 29 (05): : 505 - 521
  • [4] Poland, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Hungary - A great leap forward
    Aiken, N
    [J]. GAS ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 1997, 37 (07): : 20 - 21
  • [5] COMPARISON OF THE HEALTH ECONOMIC GUIDELINES OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, HUNGARY, POLAND AND THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
    Petrikova, A.
    Dolezal, T.
    Vasut, K.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A380 - A380
  • [6] VAT Gap in the Czech Republic and Slovak Republic
    Kostakova, Tereza
    Zidkova, Hana
    [J]. EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2015, 63 (07): : 705 - 717
  • [7] THE EFFICIENCY OF BANKS IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC AND CZECH REPUBLIC
    Grmanova, Eva
    [J]. HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS 2014: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF REGIONS, PT IV, 2014, : 164 - 170
  • [8] Social partnership in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic
    Cambalikova, M
    Mansfeldova, Z
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA, 1997, 29 (03): : 301 - 314
  • [9] Comparison of selected labor market indicators in the Czech Republic, Austria and the Slovak Republic
    Brozova, Dagmar
    [J]. REGION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETY 2014, 2014, : 86 - 96
  • [10] Comparison of Pre-Primary Education Programmes in the Czech Republic, Poland and the Slovak Republic
    Lipnicka, Milena
    [J]. NEW EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2012, 29 (03): : 261 - 274