Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Woolf, Benjamin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Edwards, Phil [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Psychol Sci, 5 Priory Rd, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Med Res Council, Integrat Epidemiol Unit, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Pre-notification; Randomised controlled trials; Questionnaire response;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-021-01462-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Missing outcome data can lead to bias in the results of systematic reviews. One way to address missing outcome data is by requesting the data from the trial authors, but non-response is common. One way to potentially improve response rates is by sending study participants advance communication. During the update of a systematic review examining the effect of pre-notification on response rates, study authors needed to be contacted for further information. This study was nested within the systematic review by randomising authors to receive a notification of the upcoming request for information. The objective was to test if pre-notification increased response rates. Methods: The participants were study authors included in the systematic review, whose studies were at unclear risk of bias. The intervention was a pre-notification of the request for further information, sent 1 day before the request. The outcome was defined as the proportion of authors who responded to the request for information. Authors were randomised by simple randomisation. Thirty three authors were randomised to the pre-notification arm, and 42 were randomised to the control arm. Authors were blinded to the possibility of an alternative condition. Results: All authors randomised were analysed. 14/33 (42.4%) authors in the pre-notification arm had returned responses to the questionnaire, and 18/42 (42.9%) in the control arm. There was no evidence of a difference between these groups (absolute difference = - 0.5, 95% CI (- 23.4 to 22.5%), p = 1). We received no complaints about receiving the pre-notification. Conclusions: This study's results do not support the hypothesis that pre-notification increases response from study authors being contacted for a request for more information. However, the study has a low power, and the results may not generalise to other contexts, methods of administering a pre-notification, or study populations.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Vitamin D Supplementation Does Not Influence SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Efficacy or Immunogenicity: Sub-Studies Nested within the CORONAVIT Randomised Controlled Trial
    Jolliffe, David A.
    Vivaldi, Giulia
    Chambers, Emma S.
    Cai, Weigang
    Li, Wenhao
    Faustini, Sian E.
    Gibbons, Joseph M.
    Pade, Corinna
    Coussens, Anna K.
    Richter, Alex G.
    McKnight, Aine
    Martineau, Adrian R.
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [32] Does digital, multimedia information increase recruitment and retention in a children's wrist fracture treatment trial, and what do people think of it? A randomised controlled Study Within A Trial (SWAT)
    Moe-Byrne, Thirimon
    Knapp, Peter
    Perry, Daniel
    Achten, Juul
    Spoors, Louise
    Appelbe, Duncan
    Roche, Jenny
    Martin-Kerry, Jacqueline M.
    Sheridan, Rebecca
    Higgins, Steven
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [33] Belimumab combined with standard therapy does not increase adverse effects compared with a control treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Xu, Ying
    Xu, Jia-wen
    Wang, Yan-jiao
    Tung, Tao-Hsin
    Chien, Ching-Wen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 109
  • [34] A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study
    Sabrina Winona Pit
    Vibeke Hansen
    Dan Ewald
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 14
  • [35] A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study
    Pit, Sabrina Winona
    Hansen, Vibeke
    Ewald, Dan
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2013, 14
  • [36] Does the timed up and go test predict future falls among British community-dwelling older people? Prospective cohort study nested within a randomised controlled trial
    Gotaro Kojima
    Tahir Masud
    Denise Kendrick
    Richard Morris
    Sheena Gawler
    Jonathan Treml
    Steve Iliffe
    [J]. BMC Geriatrics, 15
  • [37] Ketamine and Spinal Fusion Surgery: Does It Increase or Reduce Postoperative Opioid Consumption? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wijaya, Jeremiah Hilkiah
    Wong, Edbert
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 68 : 56 - 56
  • [38] Does the timed up and go test predict future falls among British community-dwelling older people? Prospective cohort study nested within a randomised controlled trial
    Kojima, Gotaro
    Masud, Tahir
    Kendrick, Denise
    Morris, Richard
    Gawler, Sheena
    Treml, Jonathan
    Iliffe, Steve
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2015, 15
  • [39] Intralipid infusion does not improve live birth rates in women with unexplained recurrent implantation failure and may increase the risk of congenital malformations, a double-blinded randomised controlled trial
    Gamaleldin, I
    Gomaa, M. F.
    Shafik, A.
    Akande, V
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 31 - 32
  • [40] Pen and Social Incentive Letter Retention Study within a Trial (SWAT) - An embedded, factorial design randomised controlled trial to investigate whether the inclusion of a pen and/or social incentive text cover letter included with the 12-month postal questionnaire improved response rates
    James, Sophie
    Parker, Adwoa
    Torgerson, David
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20