The current standard of Foot and Ankle Fellowship in the UK

被引:1
|
作者
Brown, Rick [1 ]
Akimau, P. [2 ]
Hsuan, J. [3 ]
Williams, T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Univ Hosp Trust, Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford, England
[2] Cheltenham Gen Hosp, Cheltenham, Glos, England
[3] Box Hill Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Colchester Gen Hosp, Colchester, Essex, England
关键词
Foot & Ankle; Fellowships; Training; Operative experience; Research; Surgical education;
D O I
10.1016/j.fas.2017.06.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current standards of Fellowship training in Foot and Ankle Surgery Fellowship in the UK. Methods: Thirteen UK post-FRCS (Tr&Orth) or equivalent Fellows completed a questionnaire detailing their outpatient, surgical, teaching and research experience, along with documenting their supervision and terms of employment. Results: A Fellow attended a mean of 2.5 (0.5-4) clinics and 3.84 (2-7) theatre sessions per week. 62% of Fellows had independent clinics. The three largest sub-specialty areas experienced were forefoot surgery, mid or/ hindfoot arthritis and deformity correction. 82% of Fellows had a regular MDT meeting. All were involved in both teaching and research, but only 64% had timetabled research sessions. All Fellows were satisfied with their experience and would recommended the Fellowship. Conclusions: The current standard of a post FRCS (Tr& Orth) Fellowship in Foot & Ankle surgery in the UK has been defined. Further improvement will require all Fellows to be involved in a regular MDT meetings, work in an independent clinic, have guaranteed timetabled research time and a ring fenced study leave budget. (C) 2017 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 516
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] UK haemophilia consultant access to foot and ankle services and concurrent patient impact questionnaire responses to foot and ankle interventions
    Wilkins, Richard A.
    Siddle, Heidi J.
    Chapman, Graham J.
    Horn, Elizabeth
    Walwyn, Rebecca
    Redmond, Anthony C.
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2022, 28 (05) : E136 - E140
  • [22] Current Update on Orthobiologics in Foot and Ankle Surgery Preface
    Rosenblum, Barry I.
    [J]. CLINICS IN PODIATRIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2015, 32 (01) : XVII - XVIII
  • [23] Current Orthobiologics for Elective Arthrodesis and Nonunions of the Foot and Ankle
    Wallace, George F.
    [J]. CLINICS IN PODIATRIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2017, 34 (03) : 399 - +
  • [24] Current Update on Orthobiologics in Foot and Ankle Surgery Foreword
    Zgonis, Thomas
    [J]. CLINICS IN PODIATRIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2015, 32 (01) : XV - XV
  • [25] Current topics review: Charcot neuroarthropathy of the foot and ankle
    Trepman, E
    Nihal, A
    Pinzur, MS
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 26 (01) : 46 - 63
  • [26] Current concepts review: Charcot arthropathy of the foot and ankle
    Pinzur, Michael S.
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 28 (08) : 952 - 959
  • [27] Current concepts review: Foot and ankle outcome instruments
    Martin, RL
    Irrgang, JJ
    Lalonde, KA
    Conti, S
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 27 (05) : 383 - 390
  • [28] Artificial intelligence in foot and ankle surgery: current concepts
    Vaish, Abhishek
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Vaishya, Raju
    [J]. ORTHOPADIE, 2023, 52 (12): : 941 - 942
  • [29] Characteristics of primary care consultations for musculoskeletal foot and ankle problems in the UK
    Menz, Hylton B.
    Jordan, Kelvin P.
    Roddy, Edward
    Croft, Peter R.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 (07) : 1391 - 1398
  • [30] A cost analysis of ankle fractures treated by orthopedic surgeons with or without foot and ankle fellowship training at ambulatory surgery centers and hospitals
    Barfield, Matthew
    Jackson, J. Benjamin, III
    Gonzalez, Tyler
    [J]. SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2022, 10