New ground motion data and concepts in seismic hazard analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Anderson, JG [1 ]
Brune, JN [1 ]
Anooshehpoor, R [1 ]
Ni, SD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Seismol Lab, Reno, NV 89557 USA
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2000年 / 79卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The strong motion data from the Izmit, Turkey and Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquakes have pointed out uncertainties in current strong motion attenuation curves for large earthquakes. Although the near-source strong motion data from these two well-recorded large earthquakes were well below the estimated values by the ground motion models, they were consistent with constraints estimated from precarious rock methodology. This discrepancy could be a result of inadequate ground motion data for large earthquakes and possible flaws with a number of statistical parameter assumptions that were necessary for extrapolation from existing database, which is dominated by small earthquake data. This review article discusses several important issues that have the potential to cause major impact on seismic hazard analysis. They are: (i) partitioning of uncertainties into aleatory and epistemic contributions, (ii) quantification of precarious rock observations and use of the data to constrain and improve ground motion models, (iii) continuing to deploy strong motion instruments near major faults since only more strong motion data will definitively resolve the issues of what is normal behaviour, and (iv) understanding through modelling and observations, the physical phenomena that affect strong motion, including the effect of total fault offset, surface rupture and type of faulting.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1278 / 1290
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clustering analysis of probabilistic seismic hazard for the selection of ground motion time histories in vast areas
    Mascandola, C.
    Barani, S.
    Massa, M.
    Paolucci, E.
    Albarello, D.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (07) : 2985 - 3004
  • [32] Ground Motion Modeling for Seismic Hazard Analysis in the Near-source Regime: An Asperity Model
    C.-C. P. Tsai
    pure and applied geophysics, 1997, 149 : 265 - 297
  • [33] On the use of logic trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic-hazard analysis
    Bommer, JJ
    Scherbaum, F
    Bungum, H
    Cotton, F
    Sabetta, F
    Abrahamson, NA
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 95 (02) : 377 - 389
  • [34] Determination of design ground motion for critical engineering structures based on Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis
    Wang, Guoxin
    Zhao, Zhen
    ISDA 2006: SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, 2006, : 361 - 365
  • [35] Assessment of ground motion variability and its effects on seismic hazard analysis: a case study for iceland
    Ornthammarath, Teraphan
    Douglas, John
    Sigbjornsson, Ragnar
    Lai, Carlo Giovanni
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2011, 9 (04) : 931 - 953
  • [36] Seismic hazard analysis for alternative measures of ground motion intensity employing stochastic simulation methods
    Jalayer, F.
    Franchin, P.
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2007, : 485 - 487
  • [37] Influence of ground-motion correlation on probabilistic assessments of seismic hazard and loss: sensitivity analysis
    Vladimir Sokolov
    Friedemann Wenzel
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 9
  • [38] Areal exceedance of ground motion as a characteristic of multiple-site seismic hazard: Sensitivity analysis
    Sokolov, Vladimir
    Wenzel, Friedemann
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 126
  • [39] A ground motion based procedure to identify the earthquakes that are the most relevant for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis
    Anderson, John G.
    Cotton, Fabrice
    Bindi, Dino
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2021, 37 (02) : 762 - 788
  • [40] Ground motion modeling for seismic hazard analysis in the near-source regime: An asperity model
    Tsai, CCP
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1997, 149 (02) : 265 - 297