The cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus self-collection among cervical cancer screening non-attenders in El Salvador

被引:12
|
作者
Campos, Nicole G. [1 ]
Alfaro, Karla [2 ,3 ]
Maza, Mauricio [2 ,3 ]
Sy, Stephen [1 ]
Melendez, Mario [2 ,3 ]
Masch, Rachel [2 ,3 ]
Soler, Montserrat [4 ]
Conzuelo-Rodriguez, Gabriel [3 ]
Gage, Julia C. [5 ]
Alonzo, Todd A. [6 ]
Castle, Philip E. [7 ]
Felix, Juan C. [8 ]
Cremer, Miriam [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kim, Jane J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 718 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA USA
[2] Basic Hlth Int, Ave Las Camelias 14, San Salvador, El Salvador
[3] Basic Hlth Int, 25 Broadway,9th Floor, New York, NY 10004 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth Inst, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] NCI, Dept Canc Epidemiol & Genet, 9609 Med Ctr Dr, Rockville, MD USA
[6] Univ Southern Calif, 222 East Huntington Dr,Suite 100, Monrovia, CA 91016 USA
[7] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[8] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pathol, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
Cancer screening; Human papillomavirus (HPV); HPV DNA tests; HPV self-collection; Uterine cervical neoplasms; Decision analysis; Mathematical model; Cost-effectiveness analysis; El Salvador; VISUAL INSPECTION; ACETIC-ACID; WOMEN; CRYOTHERAPY; PREVENTION; INFECTION; DURATION; PROGRAM; SAMPLES; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105931
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing has been incorporated into El Salvador's national guidelines. The feasibility of home-based HPV self-collection among women who do not attend screening at the clinic (i.e., non-attenders) has been demonstrated, but cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated. Using cost and compliance data from El Salvador, we informed a mathematical microsimulation model of HPV infection and cervical carcinogenesis to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis from the societal perspective. We estimated the reduction in cervical cancer risk, lifetime cost per woman (2017 US$), life expectancy, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, 2017 US$ per year of life saved [YLS]) of a program with home-based self-collection of HPV (facilitated by health promoters) for the 18% of women reluctant to screen at the clinic. The model was calibrated to epidemiologic data from El Salvador. We evaluated health and economic outcomes of the self-collection intervention for women aged 30 to 59 years, alone and in concert with clinic-based HPV provider-collection. Home-based self-collection of HPV was projected to reduce population cervical cancer risk by 14% and cost $1210 per YLS compared to no screening. An integrated program reaching 99% coverage with both provider- and home-based self-collection of HPV reduced cancer risk by 74% (compared to no screening), and cost $1210 per YLS compared to provider-collection alone. Self-collection facilitated by health promoters is a cost-effective strategy for increasing screening uptake in El Salvador.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus screening for cervical cancer: A review of recent modelling studies
    Holmes J.
    Hemmett L.
    Garfield S.
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2005, 6 (1) : 30 - 37
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing
    van Rosmalen, J.
    de Kok, I. M. C. M.
    van Ballegooijen, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (06) : 699 - 709
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of an HPV self-collection campaign in Uganda: comparing models for delivery of cervical cancer screening in a low-income setting
    Campos, Nicole G.
    Tsu, Vivien
    Jeronimo, Jose
    Njama-Meya, Denise
    Mvundura, Mercy
    Kim, Jane J.
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2017, 32 (07) : 956 - 968
  • [24] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING WITH SELF-SAMPLING FOR HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS (HPV) TESTING IN TAIWAN
    Tsai, B. C.
    Chow, I. H. I.
    Liao, C. H.
    You, S. L.
    Tang, C. H.
    Pwu, R. F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A656 - A657
  • [25] Offering self-sampling to cervical screening non-attenders in primary care
    Lim, Anita W. W.
    Hollingworth, Antony
    Kalwij, Sebastian
    Curran, Geoffrey
    Sasieni, Peter
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2017, 24 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Belgium: Do not forget about cervical cancer screening
    Thiry, Nancy
    De Laet, Chris
    Hulstaert, Frank
    Neyt, Mattias
    Huybrechts, Michel
    Cleemput, Irina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 (02) : 161 - 170
  • [27] Re: Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing
    Chung, Soo-Ho
    Kim, Tae-Hee
    Lee, Hae-Hyeog
    Kim, Jun-Mo
    Kim, Yeon-Suk
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (08) : 1400 - 1401
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening. A review of decision analyses
    Siebert, U
    Sroczynski, G
    Marckmann, G
    Hillemanns, P
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2003, 36 (04): : 341 - 348
  • [29] Harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non-attenders in Switzerland: The transition towards HPV-based screening
    Catarino, Rosa
    Vassilakos, Pierre
    Petignat, Patrick
    Combescure, Christophe
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2022, 29
  • [30] Primary human papillomavirus testing by clinician- versus self-collection: Awareness and acceptance among cervical cancer screening-eligible women
    Maclaughlin, Kathy L.
    Jenkins, Gregory D.
    St Sauver, Jennifer
    Fan, Chun
    Miller, Nathaniel E.
    Meyer, Amanda F.
    Jacobson, Robert M.
    Rutten, Lila J. Finney
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2024, 31 (04) : 223 - 231