Comparison of Posterior Unilateral Vertebral Column Resection Versus Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis as a Revision Surgical Modality A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:2
|
作者
Xue, Rui [1 ]
Liu, Dai [2 ]
Shen, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] HeBei Med Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Spine Surg, 139 Zigiang Rd, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] HeBei Med Univ, Hosp 3, Rehabil Off, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, Peoples R China
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2021年 / 34卷 / 05期
关键词
unilateral posterior vertebral column resection; posterior vertebral column resection; unilateral approach; SPINAL DEFORMITY; SURGERY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001123
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of posterior unilateral vertebral column resection (PUVCR) as revision surgery for severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Adult patients undergoing revision surgery for severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis in 2010-2016 with >= 2-year follow-up at our institution were assessed. Perioperative complications and clinical outcomes, including blood loss, operation time, Visual Analog Scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, and preoperative and postoperative kyphotic angles, were analyzed. Results: This study included 58 patients who were divided into the PUVCR group and the posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) group. Age (P=0.810), sex distribution (P=0.500), and vertebrae that underwent surgery (P=0.638) were similar in the 2 groups. Shorter mean operation time was observed in the PUVCR group as compared with the PVCR group (P<0.001). In addition, less blood loss was recorded in the PUVCR group as compared with the PVCR group (P=0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in a change of Visual Analog Scale scores postoperation versus preoperation (P=0.961), and at postoperative 3 months (P=0.906), 12 months (P=0.752), and 24 months (P=0.811) versus postoperation, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in Oswestry Disability Index changes postoperation versus preoperation (P=0.157), and at postoperative 3 months (P=0.899), 12 months (P=0.947), and 24 months (P=0.811) versus postoperation, respectively. PUVCR and PVCR were comparable in deformity correction (P=0.434) and final angle correction (P=0.790). Complication rates in the PUVCR and PVCR groups were 7.1% and 36.7%, respectively. Conclusion: PUVCR has comparable safety and efficacy to PVCR in treating severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis, with the advantages of the shorter operation time, less blood loss, and fewer complications.
引用
收藏
页码:E303 / E307
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of anterior and posterior vertebral column resection versus anterior release with posterior internal distraction for severe and rigid scoliosis
    Chunpeng Ren
    Limin Liu
    Yueming Song
    Chunguang Zhou
    Hao Liu
    Tao Li
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 1237 - 1243
  • [22] Posterior vertebral column resection for severe rigid scoliosis - Points of view
    Sengupta, DK
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (14) : E387 - E387
  • [23] Anterior and posterior vertebral column resection for severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis
    Chunguang Zhou
    Limin Liu
    Yueming Song
    Hao Liu
    Tao Li
    Quan Gong
    Jiancheng Zeng
    Qingquan Kong
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2011, 20 : 1728 - 1734
  • [24] Posterior total resection of the vertebral column for severe kyphoscoliosis: A case report
    Li, Zhongfeng
    Chen, Youying
    Li, Zhenhao
    Deng, Qiang
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (12) : 5700 - 5701
  • [25] Anterior and posterior vertebral column resection for severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis
    Zhou, Chunguang
    Liu, Limin
    Song, Yueming
    Liu, Hao
    Li, Tao
    Gong, Quan
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    Kong, Qingquan
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (10) : 1728 - 1734
  • [26] Results of Posterior Vertebral Column Resection: Surgical Modification of Suk Technique
    Aydinli, Ufuk
    Kara, Kursat
    Mutlu, Muren
    Yaray, Osman
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (05) : 478 - 482
  • [27] Early outcomes and complications of posterior vertebral column resection
    Papadopoulos, Elias C.
    Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba
    Hess, W. Fred
    Sanchez Perez-Grueso, Francisco J.
    Pellise, Ferran
    Gupta, Munish
    Lonner, Baron
    Paonessa, Kenneth
    Faloon, Michael
    Cunningham, Matthew E.
    Kim, Han Jo
    Mendelow, Michael
    Sacramento, Christina
    Yazici, Muharrem
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (05): : 983 - 991
  • [28] Unilateral posterior vertebral column resection for severe thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity caused by old compressive vertebrae fracture: a technical improvement
    Wang, Hui
    Zhang, Di
    Sun, Ya-Peng
    Ma, Lei
    Ding, Wen-Yuan
    Shen, Yong
    Zhang, Ying-Ze
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (03): : 3579 - 3584
  • [29] Posterior vertebral column resection in fixed lumbosacral deformity
    Suk, SI
    Chung, ER
    Lee, SM
    Lee, JH
    Kim, SS
    Kim, JH
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (23) : E703 - E710
  • [30] The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of posterior-only vertebral column resection (PVCR) for the treatment of angular and isolated congenital kyphosis
    Shengru Wang
    Kahaer Aikenmu
    Jianguo Zhang
    Guixing Qiu
    Jianwei Guo
    Yanbin Zhang
    Xisheng Weng
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 1817 - 1825