Advanced cooling technology with thermally activated building surfaces and model predictive control

被引:32
|
作者
Zakula, T. [1 ]
Armstrong, P. R. [2 ]
Norford, L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, FAMENA, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Masdar Inst Sci & Technol, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[3] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Advanced cooling technology; Model predictive control; Energy efficiency; SYSTEM; ENERGY; MASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.054
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This research analyzes an advanced cooling system, termed a low-lift cooling system (LLCS), that comprises thermally activated building surfaces (TABS) and a parallel dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS) for dehumidification and ventilation. The system utilizes model predictive control (MPC) that, based on weather and load predictions, determines the cooling strategy over next 24h that minimizes energy consumption. Different objectives, such as minimizing the total cost of electricity, can be achieved by modifying the objective function. The LLCS performance was analyzed across 16 different U.S. climates relative to a variable refrigerant flow (VRF) for sensible cooling only, and to the VAV system for cooling, dehumidification and ventilation. Five dehumidification strategies that can be used in combination with the LLCS were also investigated. The results suggest that the electricity savings using the LLCS are up to 50% relative to the VAV system under conventional control and up to 24% relative to the VAV system under MPC. The savings were achieved through lower transport energy and better utilization of part-load efficiencies inherent in inverter-compressor equipment, a result of the TABS technology and the optimal control. The LLCS also had better performance than the conventionally controlled VRF system. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 650
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A novel hybrid agent-based model predictive control for advanced building energy systems
    Sangi, Roozbeh
    Mueller, Dirk
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 178 : 415 - 427
  • [32] Application of model predictive control to advanced combustion control
    Havlena, V
    Findejs, J
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2005, 13 (06) : 671 - 680
  • [33] Dynamic heat storage and cooling capacity of a concrete deck with PCM and thermally activated building system
    Pomianowski, Michal
    Heiselberg, Per
    Jensen, Rasmus Lund
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 53 : 96 - 107
  • [34] A study of pipe parameters on the performance of cooling tower-based thermally activated building system
    Samuel, D. G. Leo
    Nagendra, S. M. Shiva
    Maiya, M. P.
    INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 27 (02) : 219 - 232
  • [35] Development of operational guidelines for thermally activated building system according to heating and cooling load characteristics
    Lim, Jae-Han
    Song, Jin-Hee
    Song, Seung-Yeong
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 126 : 123 - 135
  • [36] Model Predictive Control for Active Cooling of Photovoltaic Panels
    Ouedraogo, Asmaou S.
    Docimo, Donald J.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2024, 58 (28): : 833 - 838
  • [37] Economical Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Building Climate Control
    Pcolka, Matej
    Zacekova, Eva
    Robinett, Rush
    Celikovsky, Sergej
    Sebek, Michael
    2014 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2014, : 418 - 423
  • [38] A Model Based Predictive Control Algorithm for Building Temperature Control
    Balan, Radu
    Stan, Sergiu-Dan
    Lapusan, Ciprian
    2009 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, : 540 - +
  • [39] Temperature Control of a Commercial Building With Model Predictive Control Techniques
    Mantovani, Giancarlo
    Ferrarini, Luca
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2015, 62 (04) : 2651 - 2660
  • [40] STUDY ON LOAD PREDICTION WITH OPERATION DATA FOR CONTROL OF THERMALLY ACTIVATED BUILDING SYSTEM
    Chung, Woong June
    Shin, Dae Uk
    Seong, Yoon Bok
    Yeo, Myoung Souk
    Kim, Kwang Woo
    BUILDING SIMULATION 2013: 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION ASSOCIATION, 2013, : 2108 - 2114